AdeOAde

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@jmbprime Why are you not ululating when he he chooses Israel over the United state itself???

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@tparsi Whatever outcome the subterfuge is meant to achieve, Iran is loaded, ready, steady, and anxiously waiting to countert-attack! WAIT FOR IT!!!

[Esmaeil Baqaei @IRIMFA_SPOX]

إيران أمةٌ ذاتُ حضارةٍ عريقةٍ تمتدُّ لآلاف السنين، اعتنقت الإسلام، ثم أصبحت في القرون اللاحقة إحدى أهم الركائز التي أسهمت في قيام الحضارة الإسلامية وازدهارها؛ من الفقه والحديث إلى الفلسفة والطب والرياضيات والأدب. غير أنَّ معيار التفاضل في الإسلام ليس اللغة العربية، ولا الانتماء الجغرافي إلى أرض الوحي، كما قال الله تعالى: ﴿إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِندَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ﴾ [الحجرات: 13]. ومن ثمَّ، لا يحقُّ لأيِّ حاكمٍ أن يجعل من مجرد تكلُّمه باللغة العربية مسوغًا لادعاء تمثيل «الرسالة المحمدية (ص)»، أو أن يستبدل هذا الادعاء بالعمل بتعاليم الإسلام الواضحة.

لقد أكدت الجمهورية الإسلامية الإيرانية، بصرف النظر عن الخلافات السياسية، مرارًا على مبدأ حسن الجوار والعلاقات الأخوية بين البلدان الإسلامية، حتى في تعاملها مع نظامٍ حديث النشأة يحكم جزءًا منفصلًا من الأراضي الإيرانية. وفي المقابل، يحذِّر القرآن الكريم بوضوح: ﴿وَلَا تَرْكَنُوا إِلَى الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا﴾ [هود: 113]، كما قال رسول الله (ص): «مَن أعانَ ظالمًا سلَّطَهُ اللهُ عليه».

وعليه، فإنَّ من يتحدث عن «الرسالة المحمدية (ص)» يجدر به، قبل أن يوجِّه النصح إلى الآخرين، أن يزن سلوك حكومته بهذه المعايير نفسها: فهل ينسجم الوقوف إلى جانب قوى شنت عدوانًا عسكريًا على دولةٍ مسلمة مع النهي القرآني الصريح عن موالاة الظالمين أو إعانة المعتدين؟ وهل يتوافق استقبال أعداء المسلمين وتقديم الدعم لعملياتهم العسكرية ضد دولةٍ مسلمةٍ مجاورة مع حقوق الجوار والأخوَّة الإسلامية؟ إنَّ الجواب عن هذه الأسئلة قد بيَّنه القرآن الكريم، وأكدته سنة النبي (ص)، وشهد له ضمير الأمة الإسلامية.

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@Mautiin01 Eleeribuuuu...eleko ofooo.

[Reza Nasri @RezaNasri1]

Some in the United States are working to construct a legal rationale for striking Iran's infrastructure. Their central argument is always the same: because these facilities sustain Iran's war effort, they may be attacked. The claim is absurd. It treats a nation's economy as a battlefield, collapses the line between what fights a war and what merely sustains a State, and reads that erasure into a body of law written precisely to forbid it.

The fact is that Infrastructure that serves the civilian population cannot lawfully be attacked, and the argument that it becomes a target because it sustains the enemy's economy does not survive contact with the governing rule. Article 52(2) of Additional Protocol I defines military objectives exhaustively: objects that by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose destruction offers a definite military advantage. The two conditions are cumulative, and both are narrow by design. Civilian infrastructure satisfies neither. The "war-sustaining" theory is not a permissible construction of this text; it is a rejection of it.

The defect begins with a deliberate choice of words. The drafters wrote "military action," not "war effort," and pointedly not "war-sustaining capability." That was no accident of style. Military action requires a proximate nexus to the conduct of hostilities, whereas an economy sustains everything a State does, its armed forces among them. To read economic contribution into the definition is to reinstate a term the negotiators considered and refused.

The broader reading is fatal to the rule it claims to interpret. Every economy that funds an army funds it through farms, factories, ports, power stations, and the taxes drawn from ordinary trade. If the mere capacity to generate revenue rendered an object military, nothing civilian would lie beyond the target list. The grain that feeds a population feeds soldiers; the current that lights homes lights ministries. A criterion that expands to swallow the whole of civilian life is no limiting principle at all. It dissolves the distinction between civilian and combatant that the entire law of targeting exists to hold.

The second condition is equally decisive. A definite military advantage, assessed in light of the circumstances prevailing at the time, cannot be derived from a causal chain running from revenue, to the treasury, to some unspecified future acquisition of arms. The claimed advantage is speculative, temporally indefinite, and causally remote, the very opposite of the definite military advantage required by international humanitarian law. War-sustaining targeting does not identify a concrete military benefit. It merely assumes one.

This is why the ICRC and the overwhelming majority of States reject the theory. It reflects not the shared understanding of the international community but an isolated position, unsupported by the general practice and *opinio juris* that would be required to bind others. It has not passed into customary law, and the treaty text forecloses it directly.

Interpretation must serve the instrument's purpose. Additional Protocol I exists to shield civilians from the effects of hostilities, and where doubt persists, objects ordinarily devoted to civilian use are presumed civilian. A construction that hollows out that protection cannot be the correct one, for it defeats the very object the rule was written to secure.

Sustaining a war and waging one are distinct acts, and the law does not conflate them. To erase that line is to license attacks on civilians under an economic pretext, and to smuggle back, through interpretation, the doctrine of total war that this body of law was built to abolish.

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@PeterObi PO, did you hear Baba Ahmed say it will be difficult for Kwakwanso to market you in the North? He was your Vice during last election!! Tinubu til 4044!!!

[Steve Hanke @steve_hanke]

China has eliminated all tariffs on Nigerian goods. China's imports from Nigeria rose by a STUNNING 81% in the first half of 2026.

FREE TRADE MAKES FRIENDS AND IS GOOD FOR BUSINESS.

TARIFFS ARE FOR LOSERS.

[Steve Hanke @steve_hanke]

#JapanWatch🇯🇵: Japan spent a RECORD $73.1B to defend the yen. Its latest intervention sparked a brief 3.3% yen surge against the USD. But more than half the gain vanished after the BOJ held rates steady.

As I’ve said for decades, FX interventions are FUTILE.

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@RT_com This was why Netanyahu went to the white house

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@BarakRavid @axios What happens to the US investments and infrastructure in the Gulf?? It's a lose-lose situation

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

Iran is waiting to see at least three more cards before they fold or deal:

♠️U.S. runs out of strategic petroleum reserves?

♦️Region runs out of anti-missile defense?

♣️Republicans run out of majority?

♥️We should leave the table before any of those cards are played.

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@_Indus_ @s_m_marandi "A Muslim is the brother of a Muslim. He neither oppresses him nor abandons him."—Prophet Mohammed (PBUH). Pakistan and et al, abandoned Palestinians through the 9en0c1d3!

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@Bilalk3011 @s_m_marandi "A Muslim is the brother of a Muslim. He neither oppresses him nor abandons him."—Prophet Mohammed (PBUH). Pakistan and et al, abandoned Palestinians through the 9en0c1d3!

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@sensiblem3 @s_m_marandi He is not asking Pakistan to stand with/for Iran. He is saying through empty rhetorics, Pakistan, and et al, tacitly supported the ongoing 9en0+cid3 of fellow Muslims in Palestine. It's time for the Muslim world to be united more than ever!

[Seyed Mohammad Marandi @s_m_marandi]

Greetings. This comment, made during airstrikes against Iran, is not about the wonderful people of Pakistan - whom I have frequently praised in interviews with Pakistani journalists - nor is it derogatory toward anyone, unlike the language used by those who attack me. The affiliations of many of these attackers are clear: they are individuals who have traditionally aligned themselves with US allies in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and who routinely insult Iran. Yet governments across the region hold a view of Trump that diverges sharply from Iran's. When our children and leaders were attacked and killed with the help of neighboring countries in the Persian Gulf, most regional governments offered no condemnation. Despite the ongoing genocide in Gaza, many of these same governments - even while condemning the Zionist regime - openly call Trump and the US regime friends. When Yemen stood with Gaza, most governments did not support Yemen, owing to the influence of the Saudi and UAE regimes. This is not something any regional leader would deny or conceal; these are open policies. The Iranian government, in contrast, sees Trump as an irredeemable evil enemy who must be defeated, and considers any conciliatory behavior from the Iranian state as unjustified. These differing state-level perspectives, however, say nothing about the views of the people themselves, nor do they reflect the realities of state-to-state relations. The empire seeks to divide us. It will fail.

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@elonmusk Nigeria doesn't allow LGBTQ, gay-marriage, abortion, and the costs of child delivery, daycare, raising kids, college fees, etc are not as prohibitive as in the State or in the West in general!!!

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@Mrtheophilus87 @PeterObi I cannot argue with an Obidiot with lower intelligent quotient than the disgraceful boss.

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@RogerZakheim How many people do you have in the military and ready to sacrifice their lives for a goalless war? An educated illiterate, rogue Director brazenly advocatig for war crimes is disgraceful!

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@Mrtheophilus87 @PeterObi Why hasn't your intercranial content fully developed since when you were born till now?😣

[AdeOAde @ADEOLAADE]

@PeterObi Iweala, Soludo, Otti, Lamido, and etc, everyone with good understanding of macro and micro economics and the dynamics of Nigeria's political-economy says Tinubu is doing well except Obi who cannot polish is thoughts before he puts out his words for the media.