@xStocksFi is not just tokenized equity.
It Is The Infrastructure Layer For Onchain Capital Markets.
At the asset level: tokenized equity.
At the network level: onchain capital markets infrastructure.⬇️
I think Ink has already taken your suggestion into account, making sure that long-term participants and people who consistently contribute to the ecosystem are recognized, not just the biggest capital providers, while also giving the community a stronger sense of belonging.😊
I hope $INK will cook for those who participated in the academy not just whales providing liquidity
You will need to provide a $50k± in Tydro to get 1 point
I tested the new Kraken Wallet (prev. Beholder), it's gonna be the most used kraken product.
Ofcourse, my first app transaction had to be a swap to $KRAKMASK, 'twas instant and gasless
According to team member @0xsubugatai, earliest users get $INK points.
Try the app too? 👇
@0xIraiva If you don’t even have any points, why do you care when the TGE happens?
Accumulating more points makes a lot more sense than constantly pushing for a TGE.
Being indecisive and jumping from one thing to another will only leave you with nothing.
.@KrakenPro is now a listed broker on @TradingView, bringing Kraken’s spot liquidity and execution directly into the terminal.
That same execution, liquidity, custody and compliance stack is available to Payward Services partners.
All in one integration.
The biggest flaw in what you wrote is that you make “issuing 19 million fewer SOL would bring at least a 1.03% increase in valuation” sound like a certain, mechanical formula.
You also reduce “whether a vote is rational” to a single valuation threshold, simplifying what is fundamentally a multivariable decision problem into a single-variable comparison. This is a deeper flaw. Of course, that does not necessarily mean your conclusion is wrong, but when the key variables cannot be determined, yet you describe one choice as the only mathematically rational outcome, I think that is more like publicly gambling.
It seems that many people randomly voted no for Solana disinflation velocity at last second instead of having any discussion under a false facade of thinking it somehow preserves extra revenue through yield for them
The math is that if you believe avoiding an extra 19M SOL being printed can affect valuation by as little as 1.03%, it'd be more profitable to vote yes, even as someone who relies on inflation yield, not to mention the mimetic element for new capital
The people who prefer the quantity of the asset vs the value of it should immediately move to Venezuela and let other SOL holders know how that works out
It is mathematically nonsense to vote no to preserve miniscule marginal inflation revenue unless you believe that inflation is less than a 1% factor in the valuation of an asset
You also reduce “whether a vote is rational” to a single valuation threshold, simplifying what is fundamentally a multivariable decision problem into a single-variable comparison. This is a deeper flaw. Of course, that does not necessarily mean your conclusion is wrong, but when the key variables cannot be determined, yet you describe one choice as the only mathematically rational outcome, I think that is more like publicly gambling.
@mert The biggest flaw in what you wrote is that you make “issuing 19 million fewer SOL would bring at least a 1.03% increase in valuation” sound like a certain, mechanical formula.
BREAKING: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, & more than 100 others sign letter warning that AI-enabled cyberattacks are about to become "far more widespread & sophisticated."
1/6🤯 The world’s smartest cryptologists, famous linguists, and even AI can’t read this book. Meet one of history’s greatest mysteries: the 15th-century “Voynich Manuscript”. No one understands a single word in it! 👇
Personally, when I look at Van Gogh’s work, I don’t feel that his inner world was as complex or as profound as people describe it.
And precisely because of that, there seems to be a large gap between my own understanding of his work and the way he is portrayed and interpreted by others. So I wonder whether perhaps I simply haven’t truly understood his work yet.
I feel like I don’t really understand Van Gogh’s work. At least emotionally, I can’t quite enter into it. By comparison, I personally find myself drawn to Monet’s paintings.
How did an insult change the course of art history? 🌅🎨
In 1872, Monet captured a foggy sunrise over Le Havre harbor with rapid brushstrokes. At the 1874 exhibition, critic Louis Leroy mocked the painting as “an impression less finished than wallpaper.” That mockery became the name of Impressionism. The fate of art changed with a single canvas. ✨
Brazil’s courts have ruled that dogs and cats are legally recognized as sentient beings, not property. The decision strengthens penalties for mistreatment and cruelty, acknowledging that companion animals can feel pain and suffering. 🇧🇷
I’ve noticed that reposting videos of little animals makes my account look kind of inconsistent.
But to me, sharing those animal videos matters more than whether my account looks consistent or not.
🐘❤️ Un elefante sorprende en medio de la tragedia en Nepal
En medio de la avalancha que golpeó Nepal, un video muestra el impresionante momento en que un elefante parece ayudar a una persona atrapada entre el caos y los escombros. 😢🐘
Las imágenes han conmovido a miles de personas y recuerdan que, incluso en los momentos más difíciles, pueden aparecer actos inesperados de solidaridad. 🙏
🎥 ¿Tú qué harías si presenciaras una escena así?
#Nepal #Avalancha #Elefante #Impactante #Viral #Noticias