@affprinter This could have worked 2-3 years ago, but now will get you shadowbanned just like the person you quoted. You can't follow people in the first couple of days, you shouldn't comment until 3-4 days in, and you need at least a week of warmup, maybe 2.
@Aella_Girl "Just autocomplete" falls apart the first time the model catches a bug you missed.
It comes right back when that same model in the very next message can't follow an extremely basic instruction like "don't use em-dashes".
PICARD: Data, shields up
DATA: Brilliant! Shields can reduce damage we sustain. Not immunity. Not hubris. Just prudence. It's not precautionโit's strategy.
[camera shakes]
WORF: HULL BREACHES ON NINE DECKS
DATA: Here's what happened: you told me to raise shields, and I didn't
@MattVidPro The problem is that as soon as this gets normalized, turning it off will mean PS2-level graphics. Same thing happened with DLSS 1 - devs just stopped spending effort on optimizations and now nothing does 60fps without dlss
@CMoney4Ever Lmao, of course a corporation is on board with something that saves them money, what does that have to do with us not liking the end result
As an AI enthusiast, my problem with dlss 5 is that it changes the image instead of enhancing it. Look at Grace here - she gets a different lip tecture, dark roots, and a ton of extra wrinkles that age her 10 years.
I get the argument that developers get control, but they only get to change the intensity of the effect, not what it does
@levelsio For automated stuff on the backend where you want the behavior as consistent as possible, my prompts are still long-ish.
When I am iterating, it's always 2-3 sentences max.
What's it called when you're smart enough to know something is bad, but not smart enough to actually fix it?
Because I think I just annoyed Claude Code with so many revisions it had to tell me to fuck off and leave it alone.
The hubris of mankind truly knows no limits.
Go read the replies.
We gained sentience like 5 minutes ago in galactic terms. Our understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe has been proven wrong time and time again. And yet we have a bunch of people confidently stating that our current theories (which have gaping holes in them) are the final complete and correct ones. We can no longer be wrong and nothing new will be discovered ever again.
Truly baffling.
@kilianhekhuis@ChitandaOSRS@fear_nd_loathin@KadyMuhammad1@TheSkullTrumpet@Alicoh1 Sure, and you know everything there is to know about the universe. This is fundamentally different than the leading physicists of the 19th century declaring that there is nothing left to discover in physics. NOW WE FOR SURE FOR SURE KNOW EVERYTHING