@imperialtopos@null00333@dannyphiltalk Why VC over written? What’s your reasoning here? (Assuming the goal of the discussion is truth and good reasoning)
VC gremlins
@SbordiNico@dannyphiltalk He did. He then later made a “how to deal with TAG” video where his advice was literally “just don’t engage with the argument” lol.
@dannyphiltalk@null00333 I also just realized, you said “chat rat” because it rhymes which is incredibly fitting with my description of you being a “lesbian dr Seuss character from whovile”. You’re on your way to speaking in rhymes. I’m going to go ahead and rescind your pt because of this. 0.25/7 final
@anflfmac@Clearpath__@jsmithsky3412 You’re a retard that doesn’t know what the ad hom fallacy was. You didn’t present an argument so it isn’t ad hom. You’re an idiot. 😂
@anflfmac@Clearpath__@jsmithsky3412 Nice critique. We call it a fallacy. Specifically an ad hom. Fallacies are prime examples of poor reasoning. Poor reasoning implies severe and profound retardation. Do better next time, retard.
@TheGenXTruther Can you define what is meant by “act” in “pure act”?
Can you define what is meant by “potential”?
If you can’t, then you are a retard and don’t know what you’re talking about. I eagerly await your pathetic attempt. Running by blocking is crazy work 😂
@DiamondEyesFox “You have an obligation to give your child a shot at a fulfilling life”
Yet you’re trying to justify ending their life.
“If it loses its chance due to things outside of your control thats different”
Special pleading contradiction but also, not aborting is in your control
@sceeneey @KHammerness @justalexoki The greatest man (Jesus) is also praised for the same thing. Now what? You cling to a weird “I’m a woman, I’m oppressed, feel bad for me, have pity for me” and it’s just pathetic
@sceeneey @justalexoki You’re bouncing around between claims.
You claimed the church taught that women don’t have souls. Back that up.
Instead, you’re trying to argue for a different claim of “there was misogyny in law” and yet you still haven’t provided a source or any reasoning to accompany it
@sceeneey @justalexoki Do you not know what “source” means? You’re coming across as slow.
You’re now shifting your argument from “the church said women don’t have souls” to “women were oppressed” (which is also false) but is a completely different claim. You’re confused.
@Jepp8675309@LaIllusiveMan@BishopBarron Never said or implied this. You’re slow. I know you think so but you aren’t a deeper thinker than the pope (any of them)