davy / pikaspeed

i usually just RT stuff, turn off RTs from me if you don't like what i RT

[charsky @FormDeterminer]

Another tally for the meager moral fruits argument I guess

[bad_stats 🕜💵🖨️🕣 @thebadstats]

I'm working on a theory that Joe Rogan may be the stupidest man who has ever lived

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@null00333 @Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 I don't really care about what you're going on about with the "logic is metaphysical" shit, all I was laughing at was you saying the W-PSR is derived from the laws of logic, if you don't respond with the proof next time I'm disengaging

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@null00333 @Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 Can you write out the proof for the W-PSR using only the 3 laws? This is all irrelevant nonsense I'm not interested in

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@null00333 @Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 Do you not understand that if something is derived from the 3 laws, it's a theorem of classical TFL? And TFL doesn't have any modal operators which W-PSR uses ("possibly"), because modal operators aren't truth-functional.. W-PSR is a metaphysical posit not a logical theorem

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@null00333 @Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 Also, this is the W-PSR, not what you said (from Oppy's paper that directly quotes Pruss and Gale's paper, where he shows that their W-PSR implies their S-PSR)

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@null00333 @Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 I'm laughing at you saying it's "derived from the laws of logic". I suppose you don't even know what that means, since you seem to think denying that is to say it's illogical..

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@isaacccoll @null00333 @dannyphiltalk 😭

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@AMuyjs @dannyphiltalk @null00333 "The PSR is derived from the laws of logic" 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@isaacccoll @null00333 @dannyphiltalk lmfao that part is so funny

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 Mind you, (in case this wasn't clear) I'm not granting any sense of "natural" that has normative content, like in "it's perfectly natural for children to do that". All I'm granting for the sake of argument is that it's in accord with a biological function of our teeth.

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 Therefore?

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 Therefore?

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@Id10tzQuery @Navier_Tokes @sigmahamster2 Yeah if someone said eating meat isn't something other animals do, then that would be relevant. But nobody says "we shouldn't eat meat because other animals don't" lol

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@darwintojesus @dannyphiltalk Regress doesn't necessarily involve temporality. For example, there's an infinite regress of negative integers. His reasons could be like that: his reason to create is for the sake of aim A, and his reason for fulfilling aim A is for the sake of aim B, etc.

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@MagkWalnut @uefn_hub it's not the fortnite devs making it

[davy / pikaspeed @pikaspeedtwit]

@annnnn_nnnnnna Teahouse on the tracks mentioned