CLIVE WILLIAMS

[William Makis MD @MakisMedicine]

These 2021 "COVID Deaths" charts are 100% fraudulent.

The unvaccinated died in large numbers in only one place: the HOSPITALS where they were murdered by hospital protocols. They didn't die of COVID.

Unvaccinated homeless didn't die in the streets
Unvaccinated didn't die at home
Millions of unvaccinated illegal immigrants didn't die

There was only one place dangerous for the unvaccinated in 2021 - Hospitals.

But the fraud goes MUCH deeper.

Hospital administrators had 2 main tasks:

1. Make the COVID-19 jabs look good at all costs
2. Make $50,000+ for each "COVID case"

This manifested in the following behaviors of hospital staff (this is well documented):

1. Unvaccinated were tested heavily, declared COVID positive and put on ventilators & remdesivir, many were murdered this way so the hospital could make back money.

2. Vaccinated were not tested at all, and their deaths were labeled "anything but COVID"

3. Many recently vaccinated were labeled "unvaccinated" and if they died from COVID jabs, they were labeled "unvaccinated COVID death"

This kind of hospital fraud was pervasive and systemic.

That's how you get a bogus fake chart like the one posted by Ian.

And they always cut these charts off in late 2021.
Do you know WHY? I would bet Ian doesn't.

That's when these fraudulent charts were deliberately flipped, to justify rolling out COVID-19 booster shots

And the COVID-19 boosters were rolled out in the fall of 2021, where all these charts are cut off.

I'm tired of the bulshit.

Copeland should be stripped of his PhD for posting this fraudulent garbage non-stop.

We have frauds like this all throughout science and medicine and it has to stop.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

TWO MASSIVE STUDIES LINK COVID VACCINATION TO HIGHER RISK OF 7 MAJOR CANCERS

Prostate: +69%
Bladder: +62%
Breast: +54%
Lung: +53%
Colon: +35%
Stomach: +34%
Thyroid: +35%

mRNA shots will go down in history as one of the LARGEST carcinogenic exposures ever recorded.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

In New Zealand, where 94.7% of the eligible population is fully vaccinated, they experienced a *3,203% spike in excess deaths* compared to 2020, with 5,285 excess deaths recorded in a 49-week period in 2022. Whistleblower Barry Young released the NZ Government record level data which recorded the doses dates and deaths following the Covid shots being administered . Barry Young is being prosecuted by the Crown for making the data public and exposing the Covid jabs crime. The article contrasts these high mortality claims with evidence that the government granted over 11,000 vaccine exemptions to key staff and elites while enforcing mandates on the general public, leading to accusations of hypocrisy by former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s administration.

https://t.co/Ab6SmhSZl8

https://t.co/6E5zOsrSUB

[Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki @MatthewWielicki]

Where are the headlines?

[Nell McFurtado @weenell3]

Fuel Prices: 2008 vs 2026.
So tell me — is this really all down to Trump and global oil prices, or are fuel companies and the UK Government taking us for a ride too? 🤔
👇👇

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

*Man-made* climate change is a hoax.
We have no control over Sun & clouds.
CO2 is NOT the control knob of climate.

[Black Bond PTV @BlackBondPtv]

🚨LA SCIENCE VIENT D’ÉCLATER LE RÉCIT CLIMATIQUE

Une étude Nature vient de sortir :

Une calotte glaciaire de 500 mètres d’épaisseur au nord-ouest du Groenland était COMPLÈTEMENT LIBRE DE GLACE il y a seulement 7 000 ans.

Les chercheurs ont foré jusqu’aux sédiments… exposés au soleil à l’époque.

Températures d’été : +3 à +5°C par rapport à aujourd’hui.

Zéro CO2 anthropique. Juste de la variabilité naturelle.

Encore une fois la science officielle se prend une claque.

Le climat a toujours changé sans nous… vous le saviez?

Source: @Electroversenet

[Climate Realists @ClimateRealists]

Why is No One Talking about Gross Zero Carbon Emissions? 'Net' Zero is a con, says Professor James Alexander, like trying to save the world with a sleight of hand. Gross Zero would be more honest. But all too often it's the words we use that hide the truth https://t.co/0XebbVnfJO

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

The United Nations worst case global warming scenario collapsed a few months ago after admissions the modellers got it wrong.

The world is no longer facing a 5.5°C warming trajectory by 2100 at all. That target has been removed as 'implausible'. Yet this was the chief driving reason for a global transition away from fossil fuels, and replacing them with energy from wind turbines and solar panels.

This effort to harness wind and sunlight could become one of the greatest economic disasters in modern history, costing $275 trillion by the time a new fully developed infrastructure is in place by 2050. This would include a second global power grid costing $21 trillion.

The UN explanation—'We are on track for a 5°C apocalypse if we don't immediately upend the global economy'—is dead.

Removing its extreme scenario creates a distinct institutional challenge for a climate bureaucracy that spent 25 years leveraging fear. We are left with a blighted rural landscape, trillions of dollars spent on a gigantic physical overbuild and the likelihood that this will become a self-fulfilling, replacement loop every 20 to 30 years.

The scientific community has acknowledged that the catastrophic, upper-end predictions were built on flawed, outdated economic models, because early modelers failed to understand real-world market trends.

First made available in 2011 to drive global climate policy, this extreme scenario—known widely as RCP8.5 (and later SSP5-8.5)—served as the primary engine for the media's terrifying 'business-as-usual' headlines for over a decade.

It was built on assumptions that humanity would aggressively abandon clean tech, undergo an unprecedented five-fold increase in coal use, and even resort to converting coal to oil to run vehicles. Those apocalyptic projections simply didn't occur and fossil fuels produce 81% of global primary energy; wind-solar 6.5%.

With the retirement of the extreme 5C baseline for the upcoming 7th Assessment Report (AR7), the ceiling for projected global warming has dropped significantly. The newly proposed high-emissions baseline has been downgraded to a maximum of 3.3°C by 2100.

The climate narrative has now officially shifted from an existential struggle of 'apocalypse versus survival' to a standard problem of risk management.

Developed in the early 2010s, RCP8.5 was intended to reflect its worst-case scenario available at the time, according to an analysis by Carbon Brief. It modeled a future with rapid population growth and massive, unchecked coal expansion where global coal use would increase multifold by 2100.

Media outlets, advocacy groups, and financial regulators defaulted to RCP8.5, creating a vision of unchecked coal expansion. Yet while real-world coal production did rise—driven by China and India to roughly 9 billion tons annually—it never approached the absurd 5x multiplier required by the UN’s old models.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

COVID SHOTS INCREASE YOUR RISK OF 7 MAJOR CANCERS

Breast: +54%
Colon: +35%
Prostate: +69%
Bladder: +62%
Stomach: +34%
Lung: +53%
Thyroid: +35%

Over 70% of the ENTIRE population was injected with a CARCINOGENIC biological agent.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

FIRST-EVER STUDY FINDS COVID-19 “VACCINES” CAN INTEGRATE INTO THE HUMAN GENOME

We found an mRNA “vaccine” spike gene sequence FUSED into CHROMOSOME 19 in a Stage IV turbo cancer victim following 3 mRNA injections.

The odds of this being a random coincidence: ONE IN A TRILLION.

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

OIL & GAS ARE NOT "FOSSIL FUELS"!
THEY ARE A RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE CREATED BY A GEOTHERMAL REACTION IN EARTH'S MANTLE:
'Abiogenic Deep Origin of Hydrocarbons and Oil and Gas Deposits Formation':
"The theory of the abiogenic deep origin of hydrocarbons recognizes that the petroleum is a primordial material of deep origin [Kutcherov, Krayushkin 2010]. This theory explains that hydrocarbon compounds generate in the asthenosphere of the Earth & migrate through the deep faults into the crust of the Earth. There they form oil & gas deposits in any kind of rock in any kind of the structural position (Fig. 1). Thus the accumulation of oil & gas is considered as a part of the natural process of the Earth’s outgrassing, responsible for creation of its hydrosphere, atmosphere & biosphere. Until recently the obstacle to accept the theory of the abyssal abiogenic origin of hydrocarbons was the lack of the reliable & reproducible experimental results confirming the possibility of the synthesis of complex hydrocarbon systems under the conditions of the asthenosphere of planet earth."

Link to scientific article in post below:

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

The Central England temperature record contains a big problem for the CO2 narrative.

From 1695 to 1735, Britain warmed by about 2C as it emerged from the Little Ice Age. During that warming though, atmospheric CO2 remained almost flat.

Fast forward to today, Britain is shown to have warmed about 1.5C since the 1980s--so over a similar time period.

Activists insist today's 1.5C of warming must be human-driven. But the historical record shows the climate warmed more, naturally. If CO2 wasn't the driver back then, why must it be the driver now?

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist.

An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it.

The office said they were using "well-correlated" neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie.

The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations.

When exposed, they quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only."

FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored.

Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards giving 2-5C uncertainty.

This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

2022 NOBEL PRIZE QUANTUM PHYSICIST JOHN CLAUSER: CLIMATE SET BY EARTH'S SELF REGULATING CLOUD COVER, NOT CO2!

'Contra the IPCC and other major institutions, he argues that climate is primarily set by what he refers to as the “cloud cover thermostat,” a self-regulating process whereby more clouds start to enshroud the Earth when the temperature is too high, and vice-versa. Although he accepts observations showing that atmospheric carbon dioxide is increasing, he believes that gas’s effect on heat transfer is swamped by a great natural cloud cycle.

“It [the carbon dioxide] may or may not be made by human beings,” Mr. Clauser said. “It doesn’t really matter where it comes from.”

The physicist believes that objective science on climate has been sacrificed to politics. The preeminence of politics is all the worse, he said, because so much money has already gone to climate.

“We’re talking about trillions of dollars,” he said, adding that powerful people don’t want to hear that they’ve made “trillion-dollar mistakes.”

Now you can see proof of this in the linked post below the image.

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

THE SOLAR SYSTEM CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGES, CO2 FOLLOWS

Ice core studies have proven that warming precedes rises in CO2, so we can deduce that warming causes CO2, and not the other way round as Al Gore claimed. This was a political agenda that skewed science. This happens because the Oceans absorb CO2 as they cool, and release it as they warm up. 96% of CO2 in the atmosphere is emitted naturally. 70% of CO2 in the atmosphere has a natural origin. The greenhouse gas effect is caused by water vapour by 80%. CO2 is not the cause of warming, but it's the effect, as proven by ice core studies.

[Robin Monotti @robinmonotti]

To those who believe the alarmist narrative: in 1841 temperatures rose to 36°C and in 1911 to near 38°C. See 1911 Monthly Weather Report of the Meteorological Office. Heat wave lasted from July to September and there was a big drought. These events happen regularly, nothing new.

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

CO₂ does not control the climate. It never has.

It is not the control knob of the Earth’s temperature, nor is it the architect of our modern anxieties.

Carbon dioxide doesn't cause excessive rainfall, droughts, or the collapse of coastal cliffs. Nor is it responsible for the fractures in human society—terrorism, urban violence, obesity or the drug crisis. These are the products of a human civilisation that has survived its own annihilation by the narrowest of margins, persisting for 300,000 years largely through a stroke of cosmic luck.

Yet, for four decades, a relentless climate war has force-fed the world a diet of crisis and warming hysteria. It insists that CO₂ is the root of all evil—that it is our fault and it is the gas's fault. But the truth is indifferent: CO₂ doesn't care. It is not demonic. It is not pollution. It is the foundation of life on Earth.

Without it, Earth would be a silent, sterile rock, inhabited only by bacteria. It was CO₂ that empowered cyanobacteria to unlock the miracle of photosynthesis, slowly flooding the world with the 'waste product' we call oxygen.

Before this, the oceans were dark with iron, the skies were not blue, and the world was effectively lifeless. We should be thankful for this gas of life, rather than inventing doomsday scenarios to vilify it.

If we look at the true scale of our planet, the single greatest factor affecting Earth’s geology is tectonic continental flow. This slow, majestic dance of crustal plates shapes our continents and redirects the great ocean currents. This is nature at work.

Today, CO₂ is a mere trace gas at 427 ppm (0.04%). While it is a mighty driver for biology, it is at some of its lowest levels in planetary history. During the Cambrian Period, concentrations were upwards of 4,000 to 8,000 ppm. If those massive levels did not trigger an 'irreversible environmental collapse', it is illogical to assume today’s trace amounts will.

Every meaningful invention, every empire, and every leap in human progress occurred within the brief, warm window of the warm Holocene interglacial period.

We have never not lived in an ice age. We have survived global upheavals before, but we may not survive a self-imposed collapse into a new medieval dark age.