@TomRichey@netflix I just wrote one in which a President, by utilizing social media to repeat incoherent lies about a “rigged” election to a group out of idiocracy causes another civil war...What FB & Twitter have done is terrifying, but should they let the rebellion play out on their platforms?
@TomRichey@jack I agree that corporate censorship can be extremely dangerous. More so than overt attempts by the Executive to destroy the very fabric of democratic governance? Perhaps, but not likely. Importantly, what they did was legal, what he did was incitement to insurrection vs the US
Some people ask: Why would you impeach and convict a president who has only a few days left in office? The answer: Precedent. It must be made clear that no president, now or in the future, can lead an insurrection against the U.S. government.
BREAKING: JOE BIDEN WINS
Joe Biden will be the 46th president of the United States, CNN projects, after a victory in Pennsylvania puts the Scranton-born Democrat over 270 https://t.co/g5ahxZ3Zcu #CNNElection
@BusbinsClassAHS I imagine it happening the other way around too. Being balanced and nonpartisan doesn’t mean you are unable to be a decent human. His retweets on the other hand...
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) - An independent agency that regulates communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, & cable across the US. Formed by the Communications Act of 1934. #apgov
New York Times V US (1971) - Landmark Supreme Court decision on the First Amendment. Ruling allowed for The New York Times & Washington Post to publish then-classified Pentagon Papers w/o risk of government censorship or punishment. #apgov
Hustler Magazine V Falwell (1988) - Hustler had an offensive ad campaign portraying a well known Christian who sued for emotional distress & libel; First Amendment upheld, public figures can't recover damages w/o showing there was a falsehood of fact. #apgov