The first televised debate on 23 January 1985 saw members press government on the economy. Former Prime Minister Harold Macmillan, then Earl of Stockton, spoke without notes for 20 minutes. Lord Stockton was said by commentators to have ‘stolen the show.’
Read our new blog entry by Dr Alasdair Peterson @APeterson1990 on "Servitudes in the Sheriff Appeal Court - Acquiescence, Permission and Tolerance"
https://t.co/qLtlq0iyND
The Edinburgh Legal Education Trust is offering a range of scholarships in Scots Private Law: https://t.co/4cauc4gzgA. If you would like to discuss an application with me, please get in touch. (I'm not one of the trustees but I know a bit about researching Scots private law.)
V pleased that my article on mutual consent and the conferral of authority in agency law is coming out in the OJLS! Now available on advance access: https://t.co/DD7adveDnL
A disposition is a legal document concerning the transfer of land from one person to another. Not that exciting.
But this disposition is amazing because it was written in 1402.
That is 616 years ago. Written by someone who lived in #Orkney six centuries ago.
This isn’t cronyism. Catherine has the qualifications for the job & moreover is a legal adviser to a government whose agenda she is actually signed up to. A more nuanced analysis would ask why the SNP doesn’t emulate this approach.
@on_lothianbuses Hello, are there issues with the no 8 today? The 0922 at Rodney St hasn't turned up and the tracker keeps climbing up so that it's est arrival is the same as the next bus.
It’s common sense that the election of a Labour (or Tory) leader, being either actually or potentially a PM, should be the decision of MPs alone. Party members should have zero votes. @UKLabour shouldn’t delay or compromise on this. https://t.co/2oBOaU1ab1
Today on Norwegian TV, on our ‘BBC1’: the entire law-code gathered by Magnus the Lawmender in the 13th century read aloud by a wide ensemble of individuals, including former prime ministers and the like. At least 12 hours non stop. 750 year anniversary.
Never change Norway
And in response to several points: yes, govt-backed student loans - that are usurious on some, but will never be paid back by others - are a form of subsidy…*to the demand side*. They do nothing to ease costs on the supply side (and may increase those costs in a few ways).
You can have a free market. Or you can have state-set price controls. There are cases for both. But you cannot have a market *with* price control and still expect a supply (quantity+quality) that satisfies demand.
The previous govt’s doing. But now this govt’s problem to unpick.
It really shouldn’t need saying, but apparently it does: if the state is going to cap the price of a good below a break-even point, it also needs a plan to subsidise the provision of that good. Otherwise the good will be systematically under-supplied (in quantity and/or quality).