0x高达

正在成为web3高手，我的所有内容都不是投资建议。 不参与任何政治话题。#投研 #Alpha alpha猎人
回归刷空投
is a great project

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

我已经找到在币圈赚大钱的方式了：
1.保护好自己本金，等待到下个周期。

2.出现热点新东西后，不要去PVP赚小钱，把所有精力全部集中到“找这轮叙事的《王道龙头》（如pepe,ordi，pnut，ai16z，币安人生，分别代表了ETH主网经典meme，铭文，政治SOL meme，SOL AI MEME, 中文现货meme）。

3.一旦找到，狠狠买入，就触发”死拿死拿，打死都不卖，钻到上币安至少10亿U市值再卖”的行为，中途发生任何下跌，和FUD都不要管，不要听进去任何其他言论，就是死拿！PS：只买龙头，不买龙二和其他。

4. 总之，就是找到每一轮的王道龙头，钻石手到上大所拉高到超级大市值，再去卖。

5.再次重复下，就这么简单，币圈赚大钱就得玩meme，就得找到王道龙头，找到就去买，买完死拿，不听任何fud，谁说都不卖，直到上大所拉到超高市值再卖。

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

把你电视和音响卖了

继续做多eth才有未来！

[Machi Big Brother @machibigbrother]

Congrats @lookonchain you’re on Taiwan tv news

[Gary Du @GaryDu18]

马斯克：

我有一个停止内耗屡试不爽的方法，

那就是不去分析对方的动机，

我曾经也有很长一段时间，

都沉浸负面情绪的泥沼里无法抽离，

什么都没做就觉得自己疲惫不堪，

会不断琢磨别人对我的看法和评价，

敏感、自卑、焦虑几乎快把我淹没了，

从南非到美国后我花了快10年的时间。

我试过看心理医生、阅读大量心理学的书，和高能量的朋友交流，找了很多种方法才发现最重要的就是别在意别人的想法。

如果你把所有精力都放在自己身上光是搞好自己，就耗费了大量的力气哪还有剩余的时间精力去在意别人呢。

所以不要花无谓的精力去分析对方的动机，对方是怎么想的，不重要，真的不重要！

成大事前，你先研究自己就好了，

你想要什么，你想从对方那里得到什么，

你愿意拿出什么交换，付出什么代价，

你搞懂自己的真实需求就可以了，

所以，人生重要的第一件事情，就把自己的感受放在第一顺位。

当我们自身能量充足的时候，
你才有余力去爱别人和这个世界。

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

因为世界杯来了，大家都来polymarket下注世界杯了

或许@Polymarket 会在世界杯期间发空投$poly，来引爆市场。

那将是一场加密货币狂欢。

[Don 🐂 @DonWedge]

June 12th > huge liquidity will come into crypto

Do you know why?

[scar @imfat]

just fuck around until you accidentally find the infinite money glitch

[The Wolf Of Crypto Streets @W0LF0FCRYPT0]

The bottom is not in yet

BITCOIN possible bottom ($28,000 to $30,000)

ETHEREUM possible bottom ($700 to $1000)

SOLANA possible bottom($15 to $20)

I will stake my reputation on it.

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

@chenpapro cmg

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@McMurchie @alexmd2 @Techmeme @CatherineShu At this point, I want ETH even if it is a scam

[Mustafa @mustafap0ly]

@TheGreekTrader @Polymarket totally agree with you, thanks for the feedback and we are changing a bunch of stuff internally to make sure this doesn't happen again.

[撸逊 @wuyou818]

币圈PUA3大巨头
第一巨头 @opensea

第二巨头 @base

第三巨头 @Polymarket

为什么蓝色图标那么喜欢PUA？

3个项目都经历两轮牛熊了吧

[Vass @Va77ss]

Everyone speaks about the market that should resolve to YES on @Polymarket today

Strategy sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31

8-K filed June 1, timestamps the sale as "of May 31, 4PM ET"

inside the window. first sale since 2022.

and @Polymarket is about to resolve the market as NO because the disclosure hit one day after the deadline.

let's be real about what this is

> $253M in volume on just the May 31 market
> 19,843 YES holders at 0.4¢ right now
> two NO proposals already disputed by the community
> a trader publicly disclosed buying 49,695 YES shares for $35K USDC after reading on-chain activity
> Polymarket added the clarification "confirmation outside the timeframe doesn't count" AFTER the dispute started

paying out the YES holders costs a few million. it's not nothing, but it will be recovered in no time.

most of the winners will put it back into the platform within weeks.

But resolving NO by quietly retrofitting the rules at the last minute costs the one thing prediction markets actually need: TRUST.

> community walks
> traders take the case to court (already happening)
> every future market gets read by lawyers, not gamblers
> UMA's token voting model gets exposed even harder than the WSJ already did

the sale happened. Strategy's own filing says it did.

the only argument for NO is "we didn't know yet" which is the exact opposite of how event based contracts have always resolved.

@Polymarket built something real here.

losing it over retroactive rule interpretation is the kind of mistake you don't come back from.

13 hours to final review. do the right thing.

resolve YES. the next 1000 markets are watching

[₿itcoin ₿eliever @BTCBeliever21]

🚨 BREAKING: Trader @0xDinosaur lost $35,000 on the @Polymarket scam and is taking Legal Action.

This 20-year old student takes on a $9 Billion company.

He reported the scam to the @FBI, @CFTC and @FTC.

I was the #1 holder of the market in question, and compiled his posts 👇

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

polymarket的赌注:MicroStrategy在2026年5月31日之前之前出售任何比特币。

以上的赌注充满了争议。

我在下面评论看到有个人说UMA选择了NO，已经达成共识了，十几个小时以后会出现"NO“的结果，不要相信那些KOL的话，让你去买yes。

结果这个人持有了121.2K的yes 🤡

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

No amount of fraudulent or questionable voting can change the fact that MicroStrategy sold 32 BTC before May 31st. Documentary evidence from the SEC website：mstr-20260530

无论有多少欺诈性或可疑的投票行为，都无法改变这样一个事实：MicroStrategy 在 5 月 31 日之前确实卖出了 32 枚比特币。相关文件可参见美国证券交易委员会的网站：mstr-20260530

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

嗨，塞勒 @saylor 在polymarket上竟然要判决你的出售比特币的事实是无效的。你可以来买yes，获得几百倍的利润，这样你可以继续加仓btc了。

Hi Saylor @saylor
, There's actually a Polymarket market betting that the fact of you selling Bitcoin is invalid. You can go buy Yes right now and potentially get hundreds of times your money back — then you can keep stacking more BTC!

[Jeremy @Jeremybtc]

Hey @saylor buy some "Yes" shares to pay your dividends

You'll never have to sell Bitcoin again if they flip the resolution

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

@xixikawaii @Polymarket 明天大奇迹日 翻身日！

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

@ChenYihuiYang @xixikawaii @Polymarket 明天就是大奇迹日
yes！

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

香个几把
这种海鲜味最重了，脱了裤子能直接熏🤮

[Crypto金币 @jinbiBTC]

外卖小哥是不是来闻小香风的😍

[0x高达 @ARICHCOO]

如果Polymarket希望这个市场要求在截止日期前确认，规则需要明确说明。它没有。
规则说的是“sells”（出售），而不是“announces”（宣布）、“discloses”（披露）或“is confirmed before the deadline”（在截止日期前得到确认）。

对，重点不是 “宣布” 而是“出售”

[BugsBunnymoar @bugsbunnymoar]

FOR THIS SITUATION

The fair resolution should be YES.

The market question is not “ https://t.co/4FiwoHleSo ” The question is whether MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026, 11 :59 PM ET.

Strategy’s own filing confirmed that it sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31, 2026. That means the sale occurred inside the market’s timeframe. The fact that the filing became public on June 1 does not change the actual event date.
⚠️⚠️
If Polymarket wanted this market to require confirmation before the deadline, the rule needed to say that clearly. It did not. The rule says “sells,” not “announces,” “discloses,” or “is confirmed before the deadline.”

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️
There is also precedent. In the Khamenei “out as Supreme Leader by March 31” market, the resolution depended on whether the event occurred within the market timeframe, not simply whether every piece of confirmation was available before the deadline.

That market went through disputes and still finalized YES.

⚠️⚠️⚠️
Applying a different standard here creates an unfair double standard. A later disclosure can still prove that the underlying event happened before the deadline.

⚠️⚠️⚠️
Otherwise, Polymarket is changing the question after the fact from “Did the event happen?” to “Was the event confirmed before the deadline?”

The evidence is clear: Strategy sold Bitcoin between May 26 and May 31. Therefore, under the plain wording of the market, the correct outcome is YES.