@littmath totally. I am however a big fan of moving into the direction of "Kolmogorov Appendix" that I mentioned a while ago, where you show the "minimal prompt" that allows the model to recover your result. Details TBD (and there are many!)
@skominers@MechanizeWork Seriously though, Gödel numbering and that type of approach could get you to undecidable propositions that LLMs could not solve.
Mathematics -is- a human endeavour.
There is something which maybe you're calling mathematics that has nothing to do with humans, some 'platonic otherworld' of abstract ideas. But what I call mathematics is the human attempt to explore and understand this world.
I have signed the Leiden declaration, and encourage everyone to read it and reflect.
Even if some of the points are impossible to achieve in reality, they are a good set of guidelines to try and do what is best for humanity.
https://t.co/xbJoxC6rJ3
A beautiful example of an "optimal stopping problem" – Feynman's restaurant problem – with a great backstory behind it. This is a fun, well written article, and a fun math problem too.
https://t.co/0Nng9KLDHa
Mathematically, Aumann’s theorem means I have to agree to agree with Scott! 🤝 Happy to bring formal verification to economics. Catch our exclusive in @FortuneMagazine. @axiommathai@leanprover
@KenOno691@FortuneMagazine@axiommathai@leanprover This is so awesome! Congrats! I have been saying that LEAN will be used for more than mathematics. Economics is rich ground for formalization. I proposed a while ago an idea to prove the Efficient Market Hypothesis (in its various forms) as an undecidable proposition.
Super excited to share joint work with @axiommathai that kicks off a broader project of formalization in economics.
Aumann's celebrated theorem says we can't "agree to disagree."
But what does that actually mean – formally? 👀