Father, analyst, combinatorist, AI, applied mathematics/data science, and graph theory enjoyer. @UTAustin MSDS candidate. @MemphisAlumni math alum. My views.
I know this is AI but why the hate against my fellow Indian brothers and sisters? If you support this racist mess unfollow me please. We will definitely not get along.
Please apply for the MathAndCobb Fund for Mathematical Exploration! (MaC Fund for ME)
Every few months I give away about ~$250 from my content creator funds to someone pursuing some mathematical goal. You can find the rules and how to apply at the link. Next deadline is Nov. 15th.
https://t.co/JVsUTteZ3P
A new NPR investigation has found a troubling problem in AI-generated mathematics.
Cambridge mathematician Anders Hansen identified a discrepancy between an AI-generated proof and its Lean formalization.
A constant had changed from 4 to 5, making the formally verified statement weaker than the original claim.
The Lean verification itself was not necessarily incorrect. The concern is that it may have verified something different from what the original mathematical argument asserted.
The report also features Daniel Litt, who identified an error invalidating a separate AI-generated paper, and Dana Moshkovitz, who discusses a proposed solution to the Unique Games Conjecture.
The investigation highlights a distinction that is becoming increasingly important: verifying a formal proof is not enough unless the formal statement faithfully represents the intended theorem.
Source: NPR, 21 October 2026 (US), 22 October 2026 (IST).
@LongFormMath I think it was Einstein that said something like โ I donโt know how WW3 will be fought but I know WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones.โ So I say I donโt know how Math 2 will go but Math 3 might be done with notches on bones. ๐
@octonion I mean the points are bad takes: GR is not fundamentally correct? Wow. Tell that to all of the experiments (some Nobel prize producing) that say it is.
A milestone in my journey as an independent mathematics researcher! Wolfram MathWorld now explicitly cites two of my contributions to the ErdลsโGyรกrfรกs conjecture. Honored to have my work recognized in such a respected mathematical reference.
https://t.co/0gF50WxpMa
Interesting take from our celebrated logician @JDHamkins โฆ if we altered the rules of chess where we forgo check and checkmate and actually have to capture the king, will the game be the same? Intuitively, we might say of course. Not so fast. Find out below ๐.