Atimu Gilbert

[Atimu Gilbert @A_G_Promise]

@TheChelseaForum Hi

[Christine Brejcha-Beach @ChristineBrejc1]

If you think Pharaoh was the real enemy at the Red Sea, you’re reading the story too quickly.

Most of us look at the Red Sea story like it’s a victory lap; God opens the water, Pharaoh’s army gets wiped out, and Israel walks away free. We treat it like the "happily ever after" moment of the Bible.

But if you actually look at the Scripture, something far worse hunted the Israelites than Pharoh’s pursuit.

In Exodus 14, as soon as they see the dust from the Egyptian chariots, they start losing it. They weren’t just panicking; they literally ask Moses, "Was it because there weren't enough graves in Egypt that you brought us here to die?" They actually told him it would have been "better" to stay as slaves.

Keep in mind, these people just saw ten plagues. They saw the Nile turn to blood. They watched the land go dark. But the second things got tight, fear deleted their memory of the miracles.

And we do the exact same thing.

How fast do you start romanticizing your past when your current situation gets uncomfortable? How quickly do you start missing the things God actually rescued you from, just because the future feels a bit blurry?

Even the miracle itself wasn't instant. Exodus 14 says God drove the sea back with a strong wind "all night." It was a slow, step-by-step walk. It wasn't a magic trick; it was a process.

But look at what happens just one chapter later in Exodus 16. They start complaining about food. They start talking about how they "sat by the meat pots" and had plenty of bread in Egypt.

That’s a lie. They were in forced labor. They weren't enjoying a buffet; they were being worked to death. But anxiety is a hell of an editor. It makes you remember the "comforts" of your old life while completely cropping out the chains that kept you there.

Then you get to Exodus 32. Moses is up on the mountain for forty days. No updates, or any signal he’s coming down soon. So the people go to Aaron and say, "Make us gods who will go before us."

They didn't stop believing in God you know, They just couldn't handle not seeing Him. Egypt had trained them to only trust what they could touch. So when God didn't move on their timeline, they went back to what felt familiar.

That’s the real issue here. They were out of Egypt, but Egypt was still in their heads. They were physically free, but they were still using a slave’s toolkit to handle fear and delay.

So, when things stall in your life, what do you start building? When you don't get the answer you wanted, what "golden calf" do you reach for? Is it a drink? Is it an old relationship? Is it just a desperate need to control everything around you?

The real threat wasn't the Egyptian army behind them. It was the urge to run back to what was predictable.

The beauty of this story isn't just the parting of the sea. It’s that God didn't walk away when they started acting out. He kept sending the manna and kept showing up for them. He didn't just pull them out of a country; He stayed with them while He pulled the "slave-thinking" out of their hearts.

Leaving your past is a one-time event. But learning how to be free? That takes time.

Be honest with yourself; What part of your "Egypt" are you still defending? Are you rewriting your history because you’re scared of the unknown? If God took away every problem you have right now, would you still be a slave on the inside?

#Christianity #BiblicalTruth #FaithOverFeelings #Exodus #Deliverance

Ellis Enobun

[Dr. Banda Khalifa @dr_bandak]

I have said NO to more than 3 PhD offers because of these red flags….Before You Accept a PhD Offer, ask these questions

Every year, inboxes light up with “Congratulations! We’re thrilled to offer you admission…”

And before the excitement wears off, most people rush to say yes, because it’s a dream, right?

But here’s the truth no one tells you early enough:

👉 A PhD without solid funding can turn that dream into a five-year nightmare.

⸻
To start with… if a PhD offer says we don't offer funding….. Just click decline offer….

But if they offer funding… clarify these questions

① What’s the Duration of Funding?

➜ Is it guaranteed for the entire program (4–5 years)?

↳ Or is it just one year of “we’ll figure it out later”?

🚨 If it’s the latter, run.

One year of funding is not a promise. It’s a warning.

Because “we’ll figure it out” really means you’ll be figuring out how to survive.

⸻

② What’s the Funding Amount?

➜ Does it cover tuition and living expenses, realistically?

↳ Don’t be shy. Ask for numbers. Compare the cost of living.

A $30,000 stipend in one city might mean comfort.

In another, it might mean choosing between rent and food.

📌 If your funding doesn’t let you focus on your research, it’s not support, it’s stress.

⸻

③ Is the Funding Guaranteed or Conditional?

➜ Some offers sound generous… until you read the fine print.

↳ “Funding contingent on departmental performance,” “subject to availability,” or “dependent on securing a TA/RA position” are red flags.

If your ability to eat, sleep, and pay rent depends on yearly performance reviews,
You won’t be researching; you’ll be panicking.

📌 A PhD is hard enough. You shouldn’t have to earn the right to survive every year.

⸻

④ Who Controls the Funding: The Department or Your Supervisor?

➜ If it’s tied to a grant, ask how stable that grant is.

↳ What happens if your PI loses funding? Does your support continue?

📌 Clarity protects you. Ambiguity will cost you peace, time, and probably sleep.

⸻

📌 The truth (and a friendly warning):
Don’t accept any PhD offer that starts with “we’ll see,” “it depends,” or “we’ll figure it out.”

A funded PhD = stability + sanity + success.
An unfunded PhD = stress + burnout + regret.

⸻

🎯 Final advice:

Ask the hard questions now.

You owe that to your future self.

Because no publication, no degree, and no prestige is worth five years of financial anxiety.

⸻

♻️ Share this to help someone protect their mental health (and wallet) before they say “yes.”

[Sanya Jain - Your Grad Coach @yourgradcoach]

95% of Europe PhD applications fail for one boring reason:
You don’t look like a researcher. You look like a good student.

That’s the problem.

In most of Europe, a PhD isn’t “admission.”
It’s a paid research contract.

At places like ETH Zurich, University of Oxford or the Max Planck Society, a PI is asking:

“If I give this person salary + funding for 3–4 years, what do I get back?”

Most applications answer the wrong question.

They say:
– I’m passionate about X
– I got top grades
– I helped on a paper
– Your lab is amazing

None of that reduces risk.

What reduces risk?

Clarity.

Can you state in one tight line:
This is the problem I work on.
This is the method I use.
This is the gap I’m attacking next.

If your CV looks like:
Coursework → Internship → Random project → New interest

You’re a student exploring.

If it looks like:
Project 1 → deeper version → sharper version → defined question

You’re a researcher compounding.

That’s positioning.

Not hype.
Not buzzwords.
Just visible direction.

Before you apply, fix this:
1.Cut everything that doesn’t support one research thread.
2.Rewrite your statement around a single question.
https://t.co/Ghndnpi2SG how that question plugs directly into the lab’s current work.

If a PI can’t quickly see where you fit in their roadmap, they move on.

Position first.
Everything else is secondary.

DM me “Positioning” if you want to work with me on writing award-winning PhD applications globally✈️🇪🇺🇺🇸💶💪🏻

[KHAN'✨ @khanofkhans11_]

“I was making more money than my husband. I’m a risk taker while he’s prudent. I landed contracts. Small or big. He was building his career. 13 years later my husband got his big break and made more money”

[𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐲𝐆𝐑𝐍 @AsakyGRN]

“I don’t believe men and women are equal. When it comes to gender the women are superior. Look at the burden placed on a woman. When it comes to spirituality the woman carries the burden. The woman gives birth to men. We’re helper to men.”

— Lady says.

Wait for how the men finished her. 😂

[AFRICAMUSTBEFREE!!!!!!! @engrICO2015]

Guys u see this Church ? That were I want to be !!

They say it real without compromised!!

Guys rate the pastor

[Reads with Ravi @readswithravi]

A Visual Breakdown of The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene:

[De Christian Life @DeChristianLife]

How marriage works

[True Men Tales @TrueMenTales]

Couples who talk like this last longer.

-thread-

[Jeremiah Knight @iamrjknight]

Tithes and Cheerful Giving

I read through the comment section of the post I shared on tithing yesterday, and it became clear that many still have little idea what the Bible actually says on this subject. Much of the confusion comes from blending covenants, flattening Scripture, and turning a redemptive story into a financial rule.

The tithe in the Old Testament was not ten percent of money

Under the Mosaic Law, the tithe was NOT a simple ten percent, and it was NOT PRIMARILY MONEY. It was agricultural produce tied to the land of Israel. God commanded Israel to give a tithe of grain, wine, oil, and livestock because Israel was a theocratic nation living in a land God directly governed (Leviticus 27:30–34; Deuteronomy 14:22–29).

When all the required tithes are added together, Israel gave far more than ten percent. There was the Levitical tithe (Numbers 18:21), the festival tithe (Deuteronomy 14:23), and the poor tithe every third year (Deuteronomy 14:28–29). Altogether, it amounted to well over TWENTY THREE PERCENT annually. This was A NATIONAL TAXATION SYSTEM, not a voluntary offering.

Abraham and Joshua

Yes, Abraham gave ten percent to Melchizedek (Genesis 14:20). But note carefully what the text says and does not say. Abraham gave ONCE, from the spoils of war, voluntarily. THERE IS NO COMMAND, NO REPETITION, NO INSTRUCTION TO HIS DESCENDANTS TO DO THE SAME. Scripture describes the act; it does not prescribe it.

Jacob’s vow in Genesis 28:22 is similar. It was conditional and personal, not a command laid on God’s people. These passages show generosity, not legislation.

The tithe was made mandatory only under the Law

The tithe becomes a command only when God forms Israel as a covenant nation with a priesthood, temple, and land inheritance. The tithe supported the Levites, who had no land inheritance (Numbers 18:24). It was never designed as a universal rule for all believers in all times.

This is why Malachi 3:8 cannot be lifted out of its context and aimed at the church. Malachi is addressing Israel under the Old Covenant, specifically the priests who were corrupting temple worship. To threaten Christians with “robbing God” language is to ignore covenant boundaries.

The New Testament shifts the entire framework

When we come to the New Testament, something radical happens. The tithe is never commanded of the church. Not once. Instead, we see a DEEPER, more DEMANDING vision of giving.

In Acts, believers sold ALL their property and possessions and laid the proceeds at the apostles’ feet (Acts 2:44–45; Acts 4:34–35). This was not ten percent. IT WAS EVERYTHING. It was sacrificial, voluntary, and driven by love, not law.

Paul makes this explicit. “Each one must give as he has decided in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver” (2 Corinthians 9:7). Giving under compulsion belongs to the Law. Cheerful giving belongs to grace.

Grace demands more than the tithe, not less

Here is the part many miss. The New Testament does not lower the standard. IT RAISES IT. God has not given us a percentage. He has given Himself. ��You are not your own, for you were bought with a price” (1 Corinthians 6:19–20). That price was THE BLOOD OF CHRIST.

Under the gospel, God does not ask for ten percent. HE CLAIMS ALL OF US. Our money, yes. But also, our time, our families, our homes, our energy, our gifts. “Present your bodies as a living sacrifice” (Romans 12:1). That language would have shocked an Israelite living under the tithe system.

THERE IS A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A THEOCRATIC TITHE AND NEW COVENANT GENEROSITY.

The gospel frees us from percentages and binds us to love

God does not need our money. “The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof” (Psalm 24:1). Giving under grace is a response, not a requirement. It is shaped by gratitude, not fear. “We love because He first loved us” (1 John 4:19). The same is true of giving. When Christ gives Himself fully, He does not negotiate percentages. HE LAYS CLAIM TO THE WHOLE PERSON. “For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor” (2 Corinthians 8:9). That kind of grace reshapes how we hold everything.

This is why Paul never asks, how much must you give. He asks, what does love now require. “As he may prosper” (1 Corinthians 16:2). “According to what a person has, not according to what he does not have” (2 Corinthians 8:12). Grace trains the heart to loosen its grip, not to calculate minimums.

So, giving is not about sustaining God’s work. God sustains His own work. Giving is about conforming us to Christ, breaking the power of greed, and teaching us to trust the God who “DID NOT SPARE HIS OWN SON BUT GAVE HIM UP FOR US ALL” (Romans 8:32).

That is why New Covenant giving cannot be reduced to a tithe. It is worship. It is trust. It is love responding to Love.

The tithe was a shadow. Christ is the substance. And once you see that, you stop asking, “How much do I have to give?” and start asking, “HOW CAN MY WHOLE LIFE HONOUR THE ONE WHO GAVE EVERYTHING FOR ME?”

[a d o m a a @adomaa_music]

Hebrews 7 clears up a lot of the burning questions I’ve had about tithes. So interesting that I’d never read that chapter before, it was probably in fragments.

Verse 12 solidified it for me. 😮‍💨 Who says God doesn’t answer? 🥹👌🏾

[𝐌𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐬 @mentormqsculus]

The Woman Who Resents Male Leadership Will Eventually Destroy the Family

Let’s drop the politeness.
Families don’t implode overnight.
They rot slowly. Quietly. One act of resistance at a time.

Here’s the 10 raw truth.

1. She Calls Leadership “Control” to

[Abraham Okah(info hub) @AbrahamOkah2]

10 websites you CAN NOT miss if you want a fully funded PhD/MS:

🔸www.phds. org
🔸www. jobs. ac. uk
🔸www.findaphd. com
🔸www.vacancyedu. com
🔸www.findamasters. com
🔸euraxess. ec.europa. eu
🔸www.discoverphds. com
🔸www.academicpositions. us
🔸www.universitypositions. eu
🔸www.academictransfer. com

Enter the links without any space between the letters to start your search for thousands of positions waiting for you!💝

[thefabb_ @thefabb_]

Us against the world ❤️

[Atimu Gilbert @A_G_Promise]

@itsSh0la Nissan Kicks or Toyota Corolla

[GeniusThinking @GeniusGTX]

Yesterday, 3M people found my weird obsession with cognitive biases.

A "cognitive bias" is a systematic error in thinking that destroys decision-making.

7 more of the most powerful (and dangerous) cognitive biases I've found: 🧵

1. Confirmation Bias:

[Chiefy @0xChiefy]

December: Consolidation
January: Optimism
February: Huge Pump
March: Altseason
April: Bitcoin ATH
May: Bull Trap
June: Massive Dump
July: Panic
August: Bear Market

Bookmark this and compare later 🔖

[HUMANITY VIDEO @HumanityVideo]

2025 drove us here. 2026 starts with a smile.