aOkgal

#LetFreedomRing.

[OKGirl @ok_patriot4]

@MinerBob00 @osupokes81 As time draws closer to Nov 3, are you going to post your ballot choices again? Many of us count on it!!!

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

Everyone should listen to this clip so they understand what’s going on because Victor David Hansen always nails it.

[Lara Logan @laralogan]

This is what moral courage looks like. So if you are feeling overwhelmed or you want to just surrender, remember there are amazing people like this out there fighting. Freedom is not free & principles are not bumper stickers. Women in America do not want to live under Sharia law - ever. And Americans want the constitution - not Sharia law. One nation under God with liberty & justice for all - not submission under Allah. We know what it means when you allow this into mosques & Muslim communities - it is the beginning of a parallel society that grows like a cancer. Thank you to this extraordinary young woman. You have inspired me.

[ThePatrioticBlonde™🇺🇸 @ImBreckWorsham]

I feel like this clip needs to be played on the daily.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

They love this argument: If you can’t distinguish between various factions of far-leftism, then you’re automatically disqualified from having an opinion.

Up front, here are the definitions (plus bonus Leninism definition):

Communists = Strive for a classless society with common ownership of production.
Marxists = Communists who believe in a classless society as the end of history.
Leninists = Those who idolize the man who operationalized Marxism to its logical conclusion.
Socialists = Fake meaning (Berniebros): Kids who like free stuff. Real meaning (PSL, DSA): Communists who pretend to tolerate dissent.

And now here’s the reason why they’re all interchangeable and why it’s perfectly OK for everyone to use any one of those terms to refer to the others:

They all advocate to overthrow the American government via revolution. Every single faction I’ve researched has had links to foreign hostile governments in service of revolution. Rubio’s Cuba Report from last week did a good job of documenting far left ties to Cuba. But what’s not covered is their deep ties to Venezuela, Nicaragua, Iran, China, and more.

Far-leftists are fundamentally subversive to the core, with allegiances to foreign hostile governments. All of them. That’s what makes them interchangeable. Not whether they decide their party platform via Comintern vs. parliament.

They’re “populist” only insofar as their allegiance is to some arbitrary Communist utopia rather than NATO. Which, by the way, is why I’m going to call out any right-wing commentator who proposes forming alliances with so-called “left-wing populists.”

State governments must take the lead in banning far-leftists from voting in local elections or holding statewide office.

[The White Hats @realWhiteHats]

Ready to have your mind blown?

Senator John Kennedy on Elon Musk and DOGE exposing USAID, “I'll tell you what Mr. Musk discovered. I find it fascinating. He discovered:

- The American taxpayers are giving money to Afghanistan
- He found that we are giving money to Yemen
- He found that we are giving money to Syria
- He found that the USAID has 10,000 people employees, and every year they give away $40 billion
- He found that the USAID gave money to support electric vehicles in Vietnam. Our money, taxpayer money
- He found that the USAID gave money to a transgender clinic in India. “I didn't know that. I bet you the American people didn't know that”
- He found that USAID gave $1.5 million to a Serbian LGBTQ group, they got $1.5 million to QUOTE, “advanced diversity, equity, inclusion in Serbia's workplaces and business communities”
- They found that USAID spent $164 million to support radical organizations around the world
- They gave $122 million of that to groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations
- According to this report in Mr. Musk, the USAID has given millions of dollars to quote organizations in Gaza controlled by Hamas
- He found that we gave $2 million, USAID did, for sex changes in Guatemala
- He found that we gave $20 million to produce a new Sesame Street show in Iraq
- He found that we gave $4.5 million of taxpayer money to combat misinformation in Kazakhstan
- He found that we gave $10 million, USAID did, of meals to an al-Qaeda-linked terrorist group called the Nusra Front
- Mr. Musk found that we gave $7.9 million of taxpayer money to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary gendered language. (The USAID took 8 million bucks and gave it to a bunch of journalists in Sri Lanka to teach them how to avoid binary gendered language)
- USAID gave $1.5 million to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica
- They gave $1.5 million to rebuild the Cuban media ecosystem
- They gave $1.5 million for quote, art for inclusion of people with disabilities in Belarus
- Another $3.9 million for LGBT causes in Macedonia
- $8.3 million for equity and inclusion education in Nepal

“I could go all night and many of my colleagues are upset. They're really mad at Mr. Musk. Hell, I think we ought to give him a medal”

[Wiki Leaks 1.0 @WikiLeaksQ]

That time Jacob Rothschild was confronted about the New World Order.

This clip never gets old.

May he burn in Hell!

[Lara Logan @laralogan]

Someone is on a roll…

[MOMof DataRepublican @data_republican]

I watched this tonight, and it was spectacular! Glenn and his team took a complicated subject and made it understandable in a way that I had not been able to grasp heretofore (and she's my daughter)! I think he's going to release it soon to the public. It's a much watch!

[MOMof DataRepublican @data_republican]

See... she does all this work and creates this on her own time and doesn't charge anyone a dimeto use it. Why? Because she wants to save our country. She doesn't want to hurt anyone or destroy anything that's good. Thank you to everyone who understands this. ❤️❤️❤️

[Tim Burchett @timburchett]

This will tick you off.

[aOkgal @A_OKgal]

@GretchenInOK

[Winning in America @WinningintheUSA]

🚨 OKLAHOMA’S PROPERTY TAX QUESTION WON’T MAKE IT TO THE VOTERS

Oklahomans will not get to vote on State Question 843.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled the proposed property-tax measure unconstitutional in a very close 5-4 decision.

And the split itself may be just as interesting as the ruling.

SQ 843 proposed gradually eliminating ad valorem property taxes on owner-occupied homes that qualify for the homestead exemption.

The phaseout would have happened over three years, reaching a 100% exemption in 2029.

But before supporters could even begin collecting signatures to put the question before voters, the proposal was challenged in court.

Now the Oklahoma Supreme Court has stopped it.

The majority focused on a provision of the Oklahoma Constitution requiring real property to be assessed for ad valorem taxation at no less than 11% of its fair cash value.

Their reasoning was fairly straightforward:

If a homestead ultimately becomes completely exempt under SQ 843, its taxable assessment effectively falls to zero.

The majority concluded that conflicts with the Constitution.

Because that issue alone was enough to invalidate the proposal, the Court said it did not need to resolve the other constitutional arguments raised against it.

But four justices disagreed.

And that’s where this becomes more than a property-tax story.

Chief Justice Dustin Rowe argued in dissent that the Court should not be deciding the constitutionality of the proposal before voters have even had an opportunity to consider it.

His concern was the Court becoming what he called a “pre-election gatekeeper.”

That creates an interesting constitutional debate.

On one side:

A voter initiative is still subject to the Oklahoma Constitution. If the proposed statute clearly conflicts with the Constitution, the majority concluded it cannot proceed simply because voters might approve it.

On the other:

The initiative process is itself a constitutional right reserved to the people, and the dissent questioned whether the Court should prevent voters from exercising that right before an election ever occurs.

And then there is the practical issue behind all of this.

Property taxes provide significant funding for Oklahoma schools, counties, public safety and other local government services. Opponents argued that eliminating homestead property taxes would remove more than $1 billion annually from that system.

Supporters argued homeowners deserve substantial property-tax relief and that Oklahoma’s Constitution already permits homestead exemptions.

But neither argument will be settled at the ballot box through SQ 843.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court settled this version of the question first.

And by only one vote.

5-4.

That may leave Oklahoma with a bigger question than whether property taxes should be reduced:

How far should courts go in deciding what Oklahomans are allowed to vote on before they ever enter the voting booth?

[Winning in America @WinningintheUSA]

🚨 OKLAHOMA’S PROPERTY TAX QUESTION WON’T MAKE IT TO THE VOTERS

Oklahomans will not get to vote on State Question 843.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled the proposed property-tax measure unconstitutional in a very close 5-4 decision.

And the split itself may be just as interesting as the ruling.

SQ 843 proposed gradually eliminating ad valorem property taxes on owner-occupied homes that qualify for the homestead exemption.

The phaseout would have happened over three years, reaching a 100% exemption in 2029.

But before supporters could even begin collecting signatures to put the question before voters, the proposal was challenged in court.

Now the Oklahoma Supreme Court has stopped it.

The majority focused on a provision of the Oklahoma Constitution requiring real property to be assessed for ad valorem taxation at no less than 11% of its fair cash value.

Their reasoning was fairly straightforward:

If a homestead ultimately becomes completely exempt under SQ 843, its taxable assessment effectively falls to zero.

The majority concluded that conflicts with the Constitution.

Because that issue alone was enough to invalidate the proposal, the Court said it did not need to resolve the other constitutional arguments raised against it.

But four justices disagreed.

And that’s where this becomes more than a property-tax story.

Chief Justice Dustin Rowe argued in dissent that the Court should not be deciding the constitutionality of the proposal before voters have even had an opportunity to consider it.

His concern was the Court becoming what he called a “pre-election gatekeeper.”

That creates an interesting constitutional debate.

On one side:

A voter initiative is still subject to the Oklahoma Constitution. If the proposed statute clearly conflicts with the Constitution, the majority concluded it cannot proceed simply because voters might approve it.

On the other:

The initiative process is itself a constitutional right reserved to the people, and the dissent questioned whether the Court should prevent voters from exercising that right before an election ever occurs.

And then there is the practical issue behind all of this.

Property taxes provide significant funding for Oklahoma schools, counties, public safety and other local government services. Opponents argued that eliminating homestead property taxes would remove more than $1 billion annually from that system.

Supporters argued homeowners deserve substantial property-tax relief and that Oklahoma’s Constitution already permits homestead exemptions.

But neither argument will be settled at the ballot box through SQ 843.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court settled this version of the question first.

And by only one vote.

5-4.

That may leave Oklahoma with a bigger question than whether property taxes should be reduced:

How far should courts go in deciding what Oklahomans are allowed to vote on before they ever enter the voting booth?

[Breaking911 @Breaking911]

BREAKING: President Trump announced that every eligible minor child in America has now been automatically enrolled in a Trump Account.

[GretchenInOK @GretchenInOK]

Oklahoma’s Democrat candidate for governor, CYNDI MUNSON, is campaigning as a Moderate, but her voting record is NOT at all moderate!
No wonder Democrat Socialists call Cyndi Munson one of their own!
Here is a sampling of a mere two and a half years of Cyndi Munson’s 11 years in office:

HB1002 Reduce Income Tax Rates - No

HB1449 Reduce frivolous lawsuits by defining sex as one's biological sex at birth - No

HB 2002 Battery and Aggravated Assault to include unborn - No

HB 3013 Felony for trafficking the abortion drug - N0

HB 3017 Prohibiting public tax money used for benefits for illegals - No

HB3388 School Choice - No

HB3694 Increasing Shoplifting to a felony - No

HB4156 Prohibiting Illegals from entering the state - No

SB 1513 Protections for teachers by prohibiting school districts from forcing employees to attend union meetings - No

SB1854 Prohibiting homeless camps on state property - No

SB1959 Requiring websites that contain sexual content to allow parents to block access - No

SB1994 Legal process for homeowners to removed squatters and penalties for falsifying real estate documents - No

SB426 Declaring mandates by the UN, WHO and WEF are unenforceable in the state - No

SB538 Expanding pro life grants "Choosing Childbirth Act" - No

SB721 Reducing handgun training and licensing requirements - No

SB859 Increasing penalties of thefts of firearms - NO

HB4124 Right to sell Ivermectin over the counter - No.

HB3056 Raw mild could be sold by farmers - No

HB1197 Making gold and silver legal tender in the state - No

HB1689 Illegal to remove a shopping cart from a store with fine or imprisonment - No

[First Lady Melania Trump @FLOTUS]

As we reflect on the sacrifices made by our nation’s heroes, we hold the deepest respect for America’s Gold Star families. You carry the profound loss of a loved one who gave their life to safeguard our freedom.

No words can express the depth of your loss.

We will forever honor the lives of your loved ones.

Their sacrifice will never be forgotten.

[Glenn Beck @glennbeck]

Obama flying into Detroit to rescue Abdul El-Sayed's campaign, whose own sister-in-law was put on a terror watchlist by Obama's FBI, makes a great headline. But that hypocrisy is just the surface. If you want to know who this DSA radical really is, look at the red flags he’s tried to bury.

His former head of security, Jordan Domingue, who turned down hush money from El-Sayed’s campaign so he could talk, warned that this movement isn't just progressive politics. He called it an insurgency. And it doesn't end there. Back in 2012, El-Sayed personally signed an open letter urging Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood to "purge the media and the police."

That's the real Abdul El-Sayed and I hope Michigan takes notice before it's too late.

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

If you’re wondering how our elections in America are always so close, like how Democrats pulled ahead in Virginia’s redistricting within a few percentage points, this is how

Former CIA Operations Officer Gary Berntsen explains there are teams of people who rig our elections and keep the vote totals extremely close, by slim margins, so it’s believable and hard to prove fraud

Lara Logan interviews Former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen. He explains, in detail, how elections are being stolen in America

He describes there are teams of statisticians, mathematicians, and hackers who map out every county and identify where margins can be quietly adjusted

Different techniques are used in each location so nothing matches in a recount. When a 70-30 county becomes 68-32, nobody notices. But when you add up these differences across an entire state, those tiny amounts of fraud decide outcomes

Both former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen and author Ralph Pezzullo explain the strategy. They explain they don't flip the big blue cities. Instead they shave votes in the places no one ever audits

“They know where they can find the dead people... Mm-hmm.”

“They plan this, It's meticulous. It's meticulous. These guys are experts at this. It's not just a few guys in a back room. You're talking about hundreds of statisticians and engineers, and they work it, you know, for a year to plan and mathematicians and hackers.”

“We had a map out of Colorado when we were talking to our engineers, the guys that designed it, that stole the elections.

— We just go to every one place where Trump wins 70-30 and — Shaved it off.

We shave in every other place. We don't go near a Democratic place, because when they wanna do recounts, they're gonna go to the Democratic places. They don't realize we shaved in every other committee. We know every other county.

We know how to do this. And then in each of those things where they shave, they shave with a different technique in each one of those. So if you found something in, in one county, there's no continuity around the state that way.

So this is why the Republicans are so much at fault, because they have the power and the ability to show in their areas they can allow access to the machines, they can allow access to the source code”

People need to go to prison. Democrats are stealing elections nationwide in every county, in every state of America

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

Scott Presler’s genius hack to expose all illegals on voter rolls in every state in the country. Not even a Democrat president could block it.

Here’s how Scott was able to purge thousands of illegal aliens from the voter rolls in Pennsylvania.

He obtained non-juror records.

Used the ones who were disqualified for being non-citizens.

Matched them up with names on the voter rolls and had them removed.

We need EVERY state to open their non-juror records for public inspection so we can do this across America.

This is genius @ScottPresler

[OneofTrumpsDeplorables @JeannieGiering]

This is an honest account and extremely easy to understand. I suggest you all follow and listen to her.