@xavierjp__@Apex929@al_Samancii You say a lot of good things so I say this in a nice way, these secular rulers are the greatest awliya of shaytan. Even a blind man can see it. Narrations which relating to 'obeying a ruler' mean a Khalifa who does not legislate man made law.
A completely calculating sociopath that believes in God, karma, and universal vibrational balance would conclude that doing good for others and avoiding unnecessary harm to others leads to the best net positive results for themselves. They would be indistinguishable from a Saint.
When Saudi falls, someone needs to keep a database of all of the Madkhalis and never allow them to serve as imams, lecturers, government officials, or any other position of influence over the affairs of the Muslims.
They will publicly repent as soon as there is no worldly benefit to their corrupt ideology, but there is no excuse for still supporting that corrupt sect at this point, so they need to be treated in a manner similar to how the murtadin were excluded from the Islamic conquests even after repenting.
You wake suddenly from a dream on the banks of the Tigris, east of the gardens of Eden. You are Cain, son of Adam, and what you saw has changed your mind: the future can not come to pass. A heavy stone is put to rest. You're going to enjoy the Earth's fruits with your brother.
Europe's central banks were not built to protect you, they were built to finance wars.
The Bank of England launched in 1694 with a single purpose: lend William III 1.2 million pounds to fight Louis XIV, and collect interest in perpetuity. Parliament handed a private cartel a monopoly on note issuance. In exchange, the Crown got its war. Depositors got paper promises. The model spread like an infection.
France watched and replicated. John Law established the Banque Générale in 1716, eventually converting it into the Banque Royale, which he used to flood France with paper livres backed by nothing but colonial fantasies about Louisiana. By 1720 the whole scheme collapsed, wiping out French savers across two generations and poisoning French confidence in paper money for over a century.
The lesson Europe drew was not "stop doing this." The lesson was "do it more carefully."
Germany formed the Reichsbank in 1876, Sweden had its Riksbank from 1668 (the world's oldest, and a blueprint every subsequent government copied). Each institution followed the same logic: centralize control, monopolize issuance, and give the state a captive lender when revenue from taxation proves politically inconvenient.
Ludwig von Mises explained that inflation functions as a tax. Every unit of currency created without corresponding production transfers purchasing power from your savings to whoever spends the new money first, which is always the government. That process accelerated dramatically after World War One, when the gold standard's constraints became inconvenient for states that had already promised their citizens more than they could honestly deliver.
The Weimar hyperinflation from 1921 to 1923 is the obvious horror story, but the quieter theft across the rest of Europe through the 1920s and 1930s cost savers just as much over time, simply spread across more years. Gradual expropriation carries less drama and less political resistance.
Every European central bank operating today, including the European Central Bank created in 1998, runs on this same foundational logic: the sovereign needs money, the bank provides it, and you absorb the cost through prices that never quite return to where they were.
@imamalawzai@TerryWrist88@Alghurabaaaaaa You misunderstand that part, it means the rulers may be open fasiqoon which is a lot less severe than legislating other than Sharia (current circumstances).
@ponzy_picasso@scientificecon I forsee a >90% reduction in global population in the near future.
Large multi ethnic urban centers are a big no
Would have a strong local community , local produce and gold
@DryInk@nemesis_119@islamicize No, "who do not follow my guidance or my sunnah" is referring to if they are open fasiqoon, This is very bad but no where near if they start to implement other than the Shariah. If the do the latter then they are an open enemy of Allah.