People say, "You're a professor, you must be rich.", and I say uh...no...I'm not...but I *live near* rich people and teach their children, and I've studied them, and I've seen how they make other people's lives miserable, including mine.
@n_hold@AlysonMetzger Fancy camera and audio systems in classrooms for remote teaching were installed in every room at amazing speed, they now gather dust, statues on a wall.
"What puzzles me is why a senior University academic would allow their name to be on some of the many manuscript submissions I have reviewed."
Senior academics are the worst abusers of the publishing system in general, that's why.
If you are a University lecturer and supervisor of Master’s students, by all means encourage students to learn how to write scientific journal articles but please stop encouraging them to submit such exercises to actual journals because you think it would be a good learning exercise for them. 🛑 ✋🏽 Many/most editors and reviewers provide their time voluntarily as part of their sense of duty to science. It is the job of the paid University supervisor to check the students’ work.
What puzzles me is why a senior University academic would allow their name to be on some of the many manuscript submissions I have reviewed. Did they even read it? Every author must sign that they have read and approved of the final manuscript, so what’s going on?
I expect nothing from AI companies--those with the most blood on their hands here are university administrators, They've done fuck-all to help, and often actively made it worse.
One of the things that doesn’t get said enough in the discussions about AI and universities, is how professors/instructors/TAs are being expected to clean up the giant mess that these AI companies have made.
@CCguerilla Learning can barely be assured in in-person classes but asynchronous online courses were highly cheatable even pre-2023. I don’t teach any (other than 2020), but my students love them.
This is true but being a professor means having every minute of your work life filled with crap to do, esp for the kind of professor most ready to serve students by changing their practice. There is no real space for most professors to try something new and hard at work.
Now that this equilibrium has been upset, professors resent being asked to do what true education should ask of everyone involved: try something new and hard, and grow from your failure. 3/3
“I can’t give honest feedback when it is not honest work. I can’t help you work out how you want to think about something, how you want to be in the world, if you are not using your own brain to tell me where you are.” 👍
Any educator defending the use of AI is a scab.
I don't think anyone should care what happens to the White House. Why do you care? What is this about it being "the People's House"? What dream are you holding onto?
Please send me students looking for a faculty to be more dialogic and intellectually-engaged with them, and who know how to respond in a humane way to someone attending to their educational needs.
The bluntest comment I've ever read about why students are turning to AI: “What kind of economy and educational system has made a robot feel more viable, attentive, more dialogic, and more intellectually available than the institution charging students for a degree?”
@anecdotal The institution charges for the degree and faculty in most cases would love to be able to fill the roles of being viable, attentive, dialogic, and intellectually available, but the institution prevents it and many students don't want it.