@LibyaLiberty It’s not racist to know that enough trucks have been delivered. But do discuss your opinion on the Grand Mufti starving the Jewish Quarter starting in December 1947
On this day—October 22, 2010
Andrew Whitley, director of UNRWA’s New York office, told a Washington conference that the Palestinian “right of return” was unlikely to be exercised to any significant extent inside Israel, that most refugees would remain where they were, and that it was cruel to leave them with the illusion that they would one day return to homes inside what is now Israel. For saying these words, Whitley was attacked and forced into a retraction.
UNRWA’s goal has been clear for decades: make “refugees” out of the descendants of Palestinian refugees so instead of shrinking as they resettle, they never resettle and the number grows exponentially to be used as a demographic weapon ensuring any “two state solution” would actually create two Arab states.
UNRWA responded to Whitley saying his comments did not reflect the agency’s policies. Whitley gave in to the pressure quickly. He sent a letter retracting his comments and called them “inappropriate and wrong.” UNRWA released the letter publicly.
Under UNRWA’s rules, refugee status is transmitted to descendants, producing a registered population that has grown from about 700,000 in 1948–49 to nearly six million today. This is unique to UNRWA and does not apply to any other refugees on Earth. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees seeks durable solutions including local integration and resettlement. UNRWA, on the other hand, keeps refugees as refugees no matter where they live in the world, no matter how successful they may have become, and no matter how far removed they are from the 1948 conflict.
In short, UNRWA is one of the greatest weapons used against Israel’s continued existence.
Whitley’s initial remarks were consistent with the outcome of every other major refugee population in the 20th century. The public reaction from Palestinian officials, Jordan, and others, followed by the agency’s disavowal and Whitley’s retraction, was a blatant example of UNRWA’s real “mandate.”
🚨THE RATE OF MISCARRIAGES IN GAZA WERE ACTUALLY LOWER IN 2025 AND 2026 IN COMPARISON TO PRE-WAR LEVELS
Pre-war the rate of miscarriages in Gaza were 140 per 1,000 births in 2022, or 14% of the total pregnancies. During the war we have heard over and over again that the miscarriages has been skyrocketing in Gaza, with claims of 460 miscarriages per 1,000 births, and that is one of the biggest arguments of the Genocide accusations against Israel and South Africa's Genocide ICJ case.
https://t.co/CotDbZf68z
However, as everything else when it comes to what is said about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, that claim is not actually true. 14% miscarriages tells us that 7.1 times as many children were born in comparison to pregnancies that ended without a child that was born (100/14=7.1). If we apply the same rate of miscarriages from the pre-war 2022 number onto the miscarriages numbers from 2025 and 2026, we should then see much higher rate of miscarriages then in comparison to how many were pregnant at the time.
But we don't.
How to count:
The important detail about miscarriages is that they are generally happening in the first 1-3 months of the pregnancy, with an median of week 7-8. Therefore to compare the births during 2025-2026 with miscarriages during the correct period we need to adjust both the period of the miscarries forward 7 months to match the period and multiply the numbers with 7.1 to see if the rates match.
What we see:
When doing that, as the image below shows, the adjusted miscarriages number is lower than the birth numbers where 7 months after the miscarriages happened, when adjusting for the same rate of miscarriages as pre-war 2022 average of 14% miscarriages per birth.
The months with the lowest birth rate were April and May 2026, with around 2,000 births both months. But nowhere did the rate ever got close to the reported 460 miscarriages per 1,000 births. In April for an example, if the miscarriages were adjusted 7 months forward, the rate was still only 63 out of every 1,000 deaths.
So these reports of is not just false. This show the opposite.
🚨 Gaza’s own 2025 health data demolishes the narrative of both famine and claims of horrible life conditions during the war.
This is some of the most important details we know:
1. Malnutrition amoung children under five years old, the most vulnerable age group, showed GAM (WHZ) = 0.5%, which is lower than Germany & Finland.
2. Stunting (May 2026): 12.2% (up from 9% pre-war), lower than Egypt & Morocco that are not in war, and around half the global average. That is a long term evidence that shows no widespread starvation took place the years before.
3. Neonatal mortality (children who dies first 28 days after births) = 9.1/1,000 people (up from 6–7 pre-war and still clearly better than most Arab neighbors).
4. Low birth weight: 10% (same as in 2020).
5. Miscarriages: lower than 2022 and the ratesclosely follows the number of children being born months later. This shows reports about much higher rates was actually just more women being pregnant.
6. 98.4% of births occurs in hospitals, meaning a still working healthcare system.
7. The first year of the war had 60,000 births (compared to an average of 56,139/year 2018-2022). In 2025 the number was over 50,000. However, the births followed expected seasonal patterns and also stayed at the expected pre-war rates of accounting for the number of people that left Gaza and the deaths (image 1).
8. Population rose during the war period by MoH’s own figures, with many tens of thousands and around 72,000 until September 2026, if comparing births vs deaths.
9. No famine occurred and none of IPC’s own thresholds were even close to be met.
10. Malnutrition deaths stayed very low compared to what IPCs Phase 3-5 classifications predicted (image 2). Gaza MoH reported 407 deaths in 2025 according but their own data shows that many of these didn't have malnutrition, some even died of violent attacks, and their 2025 report actually only indicates around 280 malnutrition related deaths during the year. A large share of the reported "malnutrition deaths" involved pre-existing conditions, not starvation that came from lack of food.
11. In every other famine in the world mostly children under the age of 5 dies. The normal rate is around 1/2 to 2/3 of the deaths, like IPCs guidelines says, famine experts and data from famines. In Gaza during the famine claims in 2025 75% of the malnutrition related deaths where adults even though Gaza has one of the youngest populations in the world (image 3). That's because Gaza MoH added many eldery who died of heart related causes.
12. Thousands of accidents are also included in the death toll, in additions to terrorists killed inside Israel participating in the October 7 attack. This even though this death toll figure it is presented as only including violent deaths by Israel in Gaza.
13. Much more food entered Gaza during the war than pre-war (image 4), 114 food trucks/day on average in 2024, 116/day in the first half of 2025 and then hundreds more in the second half of 2025 abd 2026. That in comparison to 2015-2023 when the pre war average was 73 food trucks/day and that included food that were much less kcal dense.
14. By 2025, natural deaths (including malnutrition) weren’t even meaningfully above pre-war levels.
Meaning:
No mass starvation. No collapsed health. No demographic collapse. The official data from Gaza itself says the opposite of the media story. No genocide.
It not just the fact that both the United Nations and B'tselem data shows more deaths occurs from Palestinians civilans on Israelis than from Israeli civilans against Palestinians.
It is also the fact that UN and the media keep on calling the area the colonial name The West Bank. And not just that, they calls Palestine "the occupied territories" in every report and data. Then UN keeps on laundering the data and 90% of what is described as "settler violence" is false.
@DougieFalconer@grok Lmfao you’re so absurd. You DO approve of ethnic cleansing because you support Palestine who still wants to ethnically cleanse the Jews and take ALL the land 🤡
So don’t lie to me about your supposed morals
No we didn’t 🤡
The Arab Palestinians started an ethnic war from their own villages and were displaced by the violence and fear that normally happens in war
@jvgraz@ActivateNH@RabbiMivasair You drove 750,000 non-Jews out of Israel in 1948 to allow the 700,000 Jews to become a majority over the 156,000 non-Jews who remained.
Ethnic cleansing was essential to the establishment of Israel. It would not have been a Jewish state without expelling the non-Jewish majority.
@DougieFalconer@grok Palestinian Jews did NOT call themselves Arabs ffs 🤣🤦♂️
It doesn’t matter if they are the descendants of converts. Arabs controlled that land through conquest. Then the Ottomans did. The Israelis won the war. All that land should be Israel if uti possidetis juris is applied
@DougieFalconer@grok Nope. You can’t steal something that someone doesn’t own 🤡 and refused to take sovereignty over multiple times to boot.
https://t.co/BDMg9cMeUe
Please share, it is important that this is seen by as many as possible.
This research paper suggests that already back in 2004 the Palestinan population was inflated by PCBS with 1.3 million people in total. From 2.5 to 3.8 million people.
https://t.co/JVSNMVz3HZ
I have now made my own research in the pre-war years, since PCBS did their last population counting in the end of 2017. By using the Palestinan official birth and death data from then until 2022 from Gaza, I could prove that PCBS inflated the numbers heavily.
PCBS claims that 2.23 million people lived in Gaza when the war in 2023 started but when adding the official birth numbers and then subtracting the deaths and people leaving Gaza during the five year period, it actually shows that the population number was actually around 150,000 lower at the time. This is important because all humanitarian aid, funding, UN data, media reports and research papers are based on a inflated number.
And if they have lied about evey number since 2017, nothing says that the population counting number from 2017 was correct at the first place. That means it is VERY likley that many, many millions less people live in Palestine than PCBS claims.
My thread with all the proof below:
@DougieFalconer@grok It’s all a ridiculous game the international community likes to play to deny Jews the right to live in our indigenous land. Literally where the Bible takes place. We can’t have it because Arabs who won it in conquest now live there but Jews aren’t allowed to win it in conquest 😵💫
@DougieFalconer@grok 🤣🤦♂️
NO. They aren’t considered illegal because land is being stolen you fcking child. They are being called illegal because the land is “occupied”. No one owns the land because it was STATE land and that state (the Ottoman Empire) is gone. No Palestinian state formed in 1948
@DougieFalconer@grok That’s so fcking reductive. Don’t start a war if you don’t want to lose a war. The Arabs tried to expel or exterminate the Jews and lost. Then they refused to make peace or negotiate for decades. Stop treating them like children who didn’t make these choices
@DougieFalconer@grok Because the Arabs refused to negotiate or let them return. They argued that it would legitimize the State of Israel. That said, some Palestinians did get to return. Israel immediately repatriated many to reunify families.
@grok@DougieFalconer But the Arab High Committee announced its intent to exterminate all Jews in Palestine and their plan was printed in newspapers of the time
@DougieFalconer@grok Settlers are NOT all from Brooklyn. And the idea that international law should keep a land free of Jews is perverse. Many of the families who moved to the West Bank had been forced out in 1948. Most “settlers” live in the suburbs of Jerusalem just over the Green Line