@JoelKatz Think for yourselves… not the sheep heard mentality if Social media…are these YOUR TRUE thoughts?!?…. People see a pumpkin demon because of brainwashed narratives …. Any Government refraining free speech…. wether it is something YOU want to hear or not didn’t matter…
My take on Davos 2023 – I honestly think it’s healthy seeing the change in how crypto showed up this year. Folks are focusing on utility and how these technologies solve real problems -- the only way the industry will move forward. Great to catch up @ArjunKharpal, @CNBCJou!
It will be a good time when this Great Crypto Purge is over and those who treated Crypto and the companies involved as personal piggy 🐷 banks 🏦 are no longer leaders in this space.
To the honorable people who still believe in the space and are building, your day is coming.
#XRPCommunity#SECGov v. #Ripple#XRP The SEC opposes the I-Remit and TapJets motions to file amicus briefs, claiming the proposed briefs are improper attempts to offer evidence outside the constraints of discovery restrictions, the rules of evidence and this Court's prior order.
When @EleanorTerrett and I were discussing the @SECGov summary judgment, I didn’t bring up the one thing that stood out the most, b/c I had only read it once, right after reading @Ripple’s brief. I didn’t want to misspeak or be wrong. I’ve now read the @SECGov’s brief a 2nd time.
And finally, the Chamber discusses how there is no authority to suggest that secondary sales can be considered part of an investment contract.
It's an important point for Ripple as pertains to potential damages if early sales are deemed an "investment contract."
GOOD START.
The Chamber is very precise in its "the asset itself is not a security argument."
But look at the bonus - pointing out that SEC "guidance" says the asset itself is not a security but SEC enforcement stated the exact opposite.
Maybe John D. knows what he's doing after all. :)
The Chamber of Digital Commerce's Amicus Brief is very HELPFUL for Ripple.
I wasn't expecting this to be honest.
Part I was confusing but Argument II and III are really good and the Chamber's "disinterest" in Ripple brings a lot of credibility to the brief.