The world is lost, the elites have enslaved us while we silently sat & watched with closed eyes. All we have to do is open them
Let's find the truth together
@AlexBarnicoat_ Hey Alex, take a look at this video. the whole vid is great but the 12-14 min mark may lead to the answer on why the Lincoln is moving a bit. The channel is definitely worth a follow.
https://t.co/vatWwumgGq
🚨 BREAKING: Iran has just been embarrassed again on the world stage, with the regime's security chief Ali Larijani being KlLLED in an overnight strike
This same hardliner Islamist THREATENED President Trump 5 days ago, vowing to make him "sorry"
Bye, terrorist 👋🏻🔥
@saucecoss@grok@Stomper69UK@j0ker937 You have two options... do nothing and wait for your 4 bucks or exclude yourself from the lawsuit, which will enable you to retain your rights for future litigation against Google. Let me know how your suit against their 1,400 member legal team works out.
I hope @saylor sues you for libel nonsense. I've been a fan of you for years, but this is misinformed BS, and you know it. @PeterShiff97416 you are wrong, you know you are, and this is wildly irresponsible... This comes from a gold and silver stacker for more than a decade, who was a fan of yours. You, who helped and led me to build my stack, are now proving you can't see outside the box, on an asset that has made you look like a fool for a decade. Grow the F@#k up... Sad to see you be like this. Honestly.. from a life-long fan who is celebrating silver at $58... thanks but no thanks...
Today is the beginning of the end of $MSTR. Saylor was forced to sell stock not to buy Bitcoin, but to buy U.S. dollars merely to fund MSTR's interest and dividend obligations. The stock is broken. The business model is a fraud, and @Saylor is the biggest con man on Wall Street.
Retail doesn't understand the market like this. This was not a retail dump. This was a reaction to macro Financial politics at play.
The big players, hold a larger percentage of the market cap than the general public understands.
Many of the OG wallets are not guys who were mining Btc on Windows Vista like degens in 2009.
You don't think they sold when they saw a 10,000% profit???
It's very likely speculators (ie wall street insiders ) bought up tons of these coins in the early 10s. Many of the market makers are inside guys with ties to Global Financial powerhouses. Max Kaiser Oppenheimer, Novogratz Goldman Sachs, Kathy woods Alliance Bernstein etc etc. You think they were the only insiders buying Bitcoin in the early days?
The end game is clear, they just need to make sure they get all their friends in who wouldn't listen years ago, who control the Global Financial system which can benefit them the most.
While all of our monthly .01 Bitcoin buys over the years helped get us here, retail has never since at least 2013 has has been the driving force behind major moves.
The four-year cycle was driven by the Global Financial liquidity cycle. Not the halving cycle.
Think back to McAfee's statement in 2017 where he said I'll eat my own dick if Bitcoin doesn't reach 100,000. He knew something retail didn't.
Can anyone verify they didn't shove his cock in his mouth after they killed him in his prison cell?
McAfee blew the whistle before anybody was supposed to know.
Retail doesn't understand the market like this. This was not a retail dump. This was a reaction to macro Financial politics at play.
The big players, hold a larger percentage of the market cap than the general public understands.
Many of the OG wallets are not guys who were mining Btc on Windows Vista like degens in 2009.
You don't think they sold when they saw a 10,000% profit???
It's very likely speculators (ie wall street insiders ) bought up tons of these coins in the early 10s. Many of the market makers are inside guys with ties to Global Financial powerhouses. Max Kaiser Oppenheimer, Novogratz Goldman Sachs, Kathy woods Alliance Bernstein etc etc. You think they were the only insiders buying Bitcoin in the early days?
The end game is clear, they just need to make sure they get all their friends in who wouldn't listen years ago, who control the Global Financial system which can benefit them the most.
While all of our monthly .01 Bitcoin buys over the years helped get us here, retail has never since at least 2013 has has been the driving force behind major moves.
The four-year cycle was driven by the Global Financial liquidity cycle. Not the halving cycle.
Think back to McAfee's statement in 2017 where he said I'll eat my own dick if Bitcoin doesn't reach 100,000. He knew something retail didn't.
Can anyone verify they didn't shove his cock in his mouth after they killed him in his prison cell?
McAfee blew the whistle before anybody was supposed to know.
THE REAL REASON BEHIND THE OCTOBER 10TH CRYPTO CRASH IS FINALLY OUT.
And it’s much bigger than what people thought.
For weeks, traders kept asking the same question:
"Why did the market collapse so violently on Oct 10 when there was no macro event, no ETF news, no exchange failure, nothing?"
Now we have the missing piece and it explains a lot.
1) MSCI quietly dropped a major update on Oct 10
On the same evening the crash began, MSCI released a consultation note that almost nobody in crypto paid attention to.
MSCI said they are reviewing how to classify companies whose main business involves accumulating Bitcoin or digital assets.
Key proposal:
- If digital assets = 50% or more of a company’s total assets
- And the company’s operating activity resembles a digital asset treasury
→ That company can be excluded from MSCI global indexes.
This directly puts several Bitcoin-heavy companies at risk, especially MicroStrategy.
2) Why this matters
If MSCI excludes these companies:
• Index funds are forced to sell
Funds tracking MSCI indices must remove these stocks.
They do not get to choose. This is literal forced institutional selling.
• MicroStrategy becomes a primary target
If MSTR is labeled fund-like, MSCI indexed funds could be forced to reduce or exit positions.
• When MSTR dumps → BTC reacts immediately
Like it or not, $MSTR is treated as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy.
If the stock shows weakness: confidence drops → Bitcoin correlation increases → retail panic accelerates → liquidations start hitting → BTC falls harder.
3) How this connects to the Oct 10 crash ?
The market was already fragile:
- Trump new tariffs
- Weak Nasdaq
- High leverage in BTC markets
- Fear of 4-year cycle top
When MSCI’s note dropped, it added a new type of structural risk that traders did not expect.
The fear was simple:
"If MSTR or similar companies get removed from MSCI, large funds will be forced to sell, what happens to Bitcoin then?"
This fear hit right into an already stressed market.
The result: one of the biggest liquidation waves in crypto history.
4) But there’s another layer: JPMorgan’s timing
3 days ago, JPMorgan published a bearish report highlighting the same MSCI risks, right when:
- MSTR was weak
- BTC was weak
- Liquidity was thin
- Sentiment was fragile
This amplified panic, causing a 14% dump in a few days.
And if you know JPMorgan’s history, you know this pattern:
They speak bearish when prices are weak.
They accumulate assets when retail is scared.
They publish bullish notes near tops.
Their timing is never random.
This is not a secret. This is standard Wall Street behavior.
5) Is JP Morgan manipulating the market?
Not illegally. But strategically, yes.
This is how big institutions operate:
- Push fear when liquidity is low
- Trigger panic
- Let weak hands sell
- Accumulate at a discount
- Turn bullish later
They’ve done it with metals. They’ve done it with bonds. They are doing it with Bitcoin.
This is not a cartel. This is Wall Street strategy.
6) Now the plot twist: Michael Saylor responds publicly
Right when MSCI fears started dominating headlines, Saylor dropped a detailed clarification:
"MicroStrategy is not a fund, not a trust, not a holding company. It is a publicly traded operating company with a $500M software business and a Bitcoin based treasury strategy."
He also highlighted:
- 5 new digital credit instruments ($STRK, $STRF, $STRD, $STRC, $STRE)
- $7.7B notional value issued this year
- Stretch ($STRC), the first Bitcoin backed variable yield credit instrument
- Ongoing software operations and financial product innovation
His message was simple:
"We are not passive holders. We are builders. We are innovating. Index labels do not define us."
7) So what does all this mean for the market?
✔ Oct 10 crash was NOT random
It aligns exactly with MSCI’s consultation release.
✔ Forced-selling fear created liquidity stress
Traders panicked because they assumed index funds might eventually dump large positions.
✔ JPMorgan amplified the fear
Their bearish note came at the perfect moment to shake markets further.
✔ Saylor finally cleared the air
His statement explained why MicroStrategy is fundamentally different from what MSCI is describing.
✔ But uncertainty remains
Final MSCI decision comes on 15 January 2026.
Policy goes into effect February 2026.
Between now and then? The market may price in more volatility.
Final Take:
The market did not crash because of a single event.
It crashed because one unexpected structural risk hit an already fragile system.
And large institutions used that moment to shape sentiment.
But the long term picture is simple:
Bitcoin adoption unchanged.
Corporate interest unchanged.
Saylor remains on track.
Institutions still building.
ETF flows will stabilize.
Liquidity cycles will return.
MSCI classification will not stop Bitcoin.
Fear creates opportunity. Narratives create volatility. But fundamentals do not change.
This is why the Oct 10 crash was violent and why it will be remembered as a technical panic, not a fundamental breakdown.
@PeterSchiff@saylor ... "Entire Business Model is a fraud" ...
10,000 employees, 13,000 customers, and annual revenue of 463 million from it's software business.
36 years in business.
Not to mention 641,692 bitcoin.
The thing you don't understand is that Sylor and MSTR are not going to sell. Complete Diamond hands backed by a cash flow positive software company, money flooding into its newly issued perpetual preferred stock offerings at 4B+, and a pile of cash. The company "insiders" own 10%+/- of $MSTR stock... that is not a lot vs. their peers.
The current valuation says the company and its income/products/subscriptions are worth nothing, and the upside to $MSTR's NaV is worth nothing.
This makes no sense, and only signals Buy Buy Buy