Revenue Is the Missing Metric
A blockchain can have an active community and an impressive narrative without generating meaningful revenue.
That's why I want to see more discussion about:
Core's fees.
Product revenue.
User activity.
conomic capture.
The next chapter of the $CORE thesis should be measured, not merely marketed.
Who's ready for what core is cooking?
A Quick Reminder 🧡
Someone said I'm making people lose money by talking about CORE.
Let's be clear:
1. I NEVER force anyone to buy. I share what I believe has value.
2. I ALWAYS say DYOR and invest what you can afford to lose.
3. Price can go to 0.009 or 0.9 - nobody knows the exact bottom. Not me, not you. Only time will tell.
BTC was once $15k and people shouted $8k is coming. Today?
I'm not here for candle chasing. I'm here for fundamentals:
✅ Bitcoin Secured
✅ Satoshi Plus Consensus
✅ Real Utility & Builders
Bear market is not the end. It's where conviction is tested.
If you don't believe, it's okay. But don't stop others from learning.
Not financial advice. Just my conviction.
@Aliyumaithermal
Entire Life of $CORE @Coredao_Org 📊
From 8th Feb, 2023 to 14th Oct, 2026, that is 1,345 days of Bulls and Bears testing $CORE.
Key Levels.
$0.48 to $4.3
$1.2 to $2.9
$0.7 to $2.01
Now $0.019 to what? Or more Dip?
After 7 months of accumulation in 2023/24, April saw $CORE rise from $0.47 to $4.3. A similar pattern has been forming in recent months. Do you think $CORE can ever reclaim such key bullish levels marked on that Chart? 📈
Three Sources of Support
Core's Satoshi Plus consensus brings together three groups:
* Bitcoin miners → delegated hash power.
* Bitcoin holders → $BTC staking.
* CORE holders → $CORE staking.
These resources contribute to validator selection.
It's a different approach from relying on CORE staking alone.
Understand the mechanism before judging the narrative.
A Serious $CORE Investment Checklist.
Believer's of a long-term view on CORE, investigate:
Token supply and emissions.
Actual network activity.
CORE staking participation.
BTCFi adoption.
Fee and product revenue.
Competition.
Security and decentralization.
Verified value-capture mechanisms.
A project like CORE becomes stronger because, it survives difficult questions.
https://t.co/oVjVGclvOg
My Core Thesis in One Post
I'm watching Core for one central reason:
Can it connect Bitcoin's capital, its security, and programmable financial applications in a way that creates sustainable economic activity?
If yes, CORE's utility and demand deserve serious examination.
If not, the narrative alone won't be enough.
Guess what?
Satoshi plus consensus mechanism is here to bring a lasting solution to the thesis above.
$CORE - $BTC alignment.
https://t.co/oVjVGclvOg
Can $CORE hit $1 before the end of 2026?
Are we underestimating what @Coredao_Org is building, or is $1 still a distant dream?
📈 BULLS: What will drive $CORE to $1?
🐻 BEARS: Why do you think it won't happen?
Drop your predictions below. Let's hear your argument 👇🏿
My Favorite Kind of Bullishness
I'm more interested in a project that can demonstrate:
Growing usage.
Reliable infrastructure.
Sustainable economics.
Transparent execution.
Than one that simply promises extraordinary returns.
That's the kind of evidence you'll see supporting $CORE over time.
$LUNC to $0.10? 🚀
The community wants it. And yes, the dream is still alive.
But let's do the math 👇
At 5.5T circulating supply, $0.10 LUNC = $550B market cap.
That’s roughly 1,900× from today’s $0.000052 price.
Burns can help ,but burns alone won't magically create $550B.
We need:
🔥 Massive supply reduction
Real demand & volume,
Stronger Terra Classic ecosystem ,
New capital entering LUNC
Hope is good.
But math is what tells us how big the mission really is.
It's a supply + demand challenge. 🦾
What your price target 🎯
👇
$LUNC is listed incorrectly and/or differently on some exchanges.
Get those bags packed correctly.
No snorkeling gear needed on the moon.
👩🚀🚀🚀😂😂😂
The Luna Classic - Luna - Luna 2.0 naming conventions are creating some confusion considering there is currently no exchange standard.
A Different Kind of Blockchain Thesis.
Some blockchain projects compete on speed.
Others compete on fees.
Core's bigger ambition is to connect Bitcoin's economic significance with smart-contract functionality.
That gives investors a different question to investigate:
Can Core turn Bitcoin participation into lasting network activity and CORE demand?
That's part of Satoshi plus consensus mechanism.
It's embaded into this block chain.
No doubt about it.
$CORE /$BTC compatibility.
The Question Behind the Price.
Before asking whether $CORE can reach a particular price.
I want you to understand what would justify that valuation.
How much network activity would be needed?
How much revenue?
What circulating supply?
What demand?
Price targets without assumptions are just numbers.
Let the facts separate the figures.
$CORE alignment with $BTC is irrevocable.
Get the taste of core today.