bowiescodpiece

[Mike Herrera @Traveler03Truth]

Per Trumps order on NDAs no longer applying to UFO WBs working with Federal Law Enforcement and other agencies.

The upside: Insider data hits the public domain, bypassing decades of government stonewalling.The major drawbacks:

• National Security Leaks: Splitting the difference between alien tech and classified US military assets is dangerously difficult.

• Misinformation Spikes: Flooding the zone with unverified or inaccurate stories could stall real scientific research.

• Foreign Intel Risks: Bad actors could easily reverse-engineer cutting-edge tech if raw data drops publicly.

Transparency is very important, but weaponizing classified data changes the game.

[Boyd @0xBOYD]

Twelve years ago an Adult Swim sketch on Cartoon Network accurately predicted the future of programming.

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@TheSkateCase Whelp, you play the role very well. You look the part of a guy who would say that. Why can't every day be vacation? Who needs a paycheck when your output is a greater understanding of realities, man? Ill quit my organic food job to go sit by the bay fulltime, wax philosphical.

[Fernando Longo @FernandoFLongo]

@MickWest, your legal point is mostly fair. The conclusion you draw from it is not.

AARO has already said that authorized disclosures are not blocked by existing or former NDAs, and that classified UAP information can be provided through secure channels. The new step reported by Fox is not automatic declassification, so no, this does not suddenly put everything in the public domain.

But that is not the point.

The purpose is to remove a barrier that some former officials and contractors still believed prevented them from speaking, and to make it unmistakably clear that they may come forward through authorized channels such as AARO and PURSUE.

Whether that produces useful testimony, documents, program names, locations, sensor records or corroborating leads is something we have to find out. You cannot honestly know the result before the process has even had a chance to work.

Yet your two predicted outcomes are arranged so that every witness loses before saying a word. Either they were confused about their NDA, or they will simply invent another excuse.

You leave out the obvious third possibility: some of them may actually know something relevant that can be checked, confirmed, contradicted or disproved.

Then you move the standard all the way to “show us where the alien craft are,” as though anything short of a recovered spacecraft would be meaningless.

But this process is about UAP information, not merely proof of aliens. It could uncover classified conventional programs, authentic records, additional witnesses, evidence-handling failures, institutional misconduct, ordinary explanations—or claims that fall apart when properly examined.

All of those outcomes would matter.

A genuinely skeptical response should be: open the secure channel, collect the testimony, demand the documents, test every claim against the records and release whatever can lawfully be released. If nothing survives scrutiny, say so afterward.

Instead, you are asking for the final exhibit before the witnesses have even entered the interview room.

You regularly argue that the evidence is missing. Now that a mechanism is being strengthened to determine whether more evidence exists, you are already predicting that it will produce nothing.

That is the contradiction.

You say there is no good evidence, and when a process is created to look for it, you dismiss the process before it begins.

At that point, the absence of evidence is no longer just a problem to investigate. It becomes protection for a conclusion you had already reached.

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@NousHenosis @george_clinton @Bootsy_Collins Such unbelievable creativity. Great music.
https://t.co/NIlgWRYmom

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@BobMcGwier_N4HY Bobs been hacked

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@LtTimMcMillan @MicahHanks @Debriefmedia The suspicion is reasonable. Everyone IS crafting a narrative, whether they intend to or not, simply by discussing the topic. Lue, etc never ask for belief, they push for transparency from gov, yet many think they are fear mongering on behalf of i.c. for defense spending lol

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@LtTimMcMillan @MicahHanks @Debriefmedia im not sure how many truly believe anything in this space. I dont believe anything. I listen to alot and try to understand experiences and perspectives. Anyone touching the topic will be suspected of crafting a narrative tailored by the I.C. comes with the territory. Ask Lue.

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@HeyLukOverThere @hopeless7784 @InterstellarUAP They are developing weapons from this tech. We can't do anything with the specifics. What's the benefit to Gov. in just acknowledging nhi? This is why the coverup exists. Its an arms race. Legacy dont care if we feel less alone if we know nhi exists, they got weapons to sell.

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@GrantLavac Tottally fine. Thats responsible. What are you and i going to do with knowing RE nhi tech to develop weapons systems is happening at Wright Patterson? Nothing. What would China or russia do? Infiltrate or worse. Some/alot should remain classified. Just get some data to scientists

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@WitnessCitizen Resistance is futile, probably.
https://t.co/sZGes8njzq

[Paul Chabai @pchabai]

@JacquesThibs Offering to help with the incident report is *chefs kiss*

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@WitnessCitizen Plenty of cringe moments. Some bad editing and acting at times. Just enough compelling stuff like the convo between the pro disclosure and anti disclosure guy saved it for me. Not great. 6.5/10. CE3 was incredible and miles above dd

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@SilvaRecord If someone has the goods I really see no reason not to do this through this avenue. Frankly, I dont need to know all the deets. Just the fact of nhi reality would be nice, with some form of evidence provided. Keep locations/derived tech classified for nat sec purpose. Makes sense

[Shooter McGavin @ShooterMcGavin]

31 years ago Tony Perkis informed his campers of heartbreaking news

[Tim Gallaudet @GallaudetTim]

During my service in Naval Oceanography, I was keen to use American #marineconservation as a soft power secret weapon. This latest op-ed of mine about that topic includes stories from my book
https://t.co/qYYONinxlQ

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@rgh_ufos Out of scope? Lol

[bowiescodpiece @AdorfaV]

@_SolFoundation Executive order?

[D. Dean Johnson @ddeanjohnson]

"How about that?"