@elonmusk why most vaccinated countries are champions at new cases and why the percentage of vaccinated getting ill exceeds by far the percentage of vaccinated individuals out of entire population?
in Romania, - 42% vaccination coverage and 60% of the cases are double or triplevaccinate
💡New study: IPCC policymaker summaries systematically amplify climate science beyond underlying reports.
💡Specifically, the paper claims that the IPCC Summary for Policymakers (SPM) is biased toward making claims more extreme than the underlying science represented elsewhere in the IPCC reports.
💡Critics of the IPCC have often made this assertion, but this is the first analysis that I am aware of that seeks to systematically evaluate the claim with data.
https://t.co/dKeLevKVhG
Another lethal Ukrainian sea drone in Romania, 5 sailors from Azerbaijan murdered on the Sea of Azov
Last month it was Greece, they've killed Polish farmers, bombed Lithuanian buildings, tortured and killed American journalists, executed sleeping kids in Starobelsk
Enough?
🚨🇷🇴🇺🇦 A Romanian military commander reported that the drone was a Ukrainian MAGURA maritime drone that exploded at berths 77–78 in the Port of Constanța today.
If the drone is Ukrainian and not Russian, that changes everything. The same thing happened in Poland 2 years ago, and they tried to pin it on Russia to get NATO involved... we have to be careful
Source: Digi 24
»Eine neue Studie der Technischen Universität Athen stellt die Klimawissenschaft auf den Kopf. Sie zeigt: In den letzten 40 Jahren hat sich die isotopische Signatur des atmosphärischen CO2 nicht verändert – menschliche Emissionen sind schlicht nicht erkennbar. Damit wird die Grundannahme der UNO und des IPCC, wonach fossile Brennstoffe die Hauptursache des Klimawandels seien, fundamental infrage gestellt.
Seit Jahrzehnten predigen die Hohepriester des Weltklimarats (IPCC), dass die Menschheit durch ihre fossilen Emissionen das Klima der Erde ins Wanken bringe. Das Mantra lautet: Mehr CO2 in der Luft, mehr Hitze auf dem Planeten, mehr Katastrophen vor unserer Haustür. Doch eine neue Studie aus Griechenland zerschmettert dieses Glaubensgebäude – und das mit nüchternen, überprüfbaren Daten. Demnach hat sich die isotopische Signatur des atmosphärischen CO₂ in den letzten 40 Jahren nicht im Geringsten verändert. Mit anderen Worten: Es gibt keine Spur fossiler Brennstoffe in unserer Luft. Der Mensch ist im atmosphärischen Kohlenstoffkreislauf schlicht nicht erkennbar.« 👇🏻
Mehr dazu: https://t.co/BjzV55EPrm
Theo Von: “Was there anybody who was immune to COVID-19?”
Dr. McCullough: “There’s one adult group. You’re going to laugh... Smokers… They got very mild cases. And they don’t get long COVID.”
Five points on why there is no need to panic about the coming, and possibly, "super" El Niño:
1. In the Daily Mail's scary red chart (below), the red indicates where temperatures might be slightly warmer than average – the red does not mean extreme heat everywhere all at once.
2. While a "super" El Niño could cause more "global warming" – El Niños add more heat trapping water vapor to the atmosphere – the warming spike will be mostly transient as the water vapor eventually precipitates out. Adding some uncertainty to the forecast, however, are the lingering effects of the 2022 Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption that added 10% to the water vapor in the stratosphere.
3. The biggest super El Niño since the El Niños began to cause recent warming (in the 1980s) was in 1997-1998. That Super El Niño actually produced more weather benefit than harm (less weather damage), per star meteorologist @BigJoeBastardi. As it turns out, El Niños suppress Atlantic hurricane activity. https://t.co/URiJGECVC5
4. While climate hoaxers will try to blame warming or extreme weather on emissions, El Niños are entirely natural – just like climate hoaxer lying.
5. Whether a super El Niño or not and whatever the weather is, we will have to cope. Fossil fuels will make any necessary coping easier to do.
https://t.co/BC3g7q9Qjw
Întristată de știrea că presa mainstream se afundă și mai mult în mocirlă lăsând un profesionist să plece, am căutat în arhivele netului emisiunea Subiectiv în care am apărut cu niște calcule simple, care demonstrau cum se umflau statisticile cu îmbolnăviții de covid, că să aibă motiv să ne închidă școlile, afacerile și în general toată țara, etichetandu-ne chiar ei, guvernanții, "ciumații Europei".
Uitați-vă la cât de simplă e demonstrația că autoritățile, adică sursele oficiale de la care trebuia să ne luam informația reală, ne mințeau cu tupeu și gândiți-vă că cei care credeau aberațiile de atunci sunt aceiași care cred și aberațiile de acum, la fel de netezi pe creier ca întotdeauna.
Pentru că am venit cu adunări și scăderi de clasa a treia, MAI mi-a blocat accesul pe pagina de Facebook, astfel încât eu, ca plătitor de taxe și impozite din care se înfrupta fără jena și angajații MAI, nu pot avea acces nici azi la comunicările oficiale.
Poate ii spune cineva domnului Pledoiu sau măcar domnului Drăgan, care îmi mai citește postările, că ministerul nu e dat de acasă de mămica lor, ci e al cetățenilor români care îi tin în cârcă pe masă-casă, privilegii, hoteluri, case de vacanță, mașini, secretare și alte figuri de gherțoi cu uniformă.
A new study analyzed daily temperatures from 992 long-running weather stations across 29 countries covering the years 1899 to 2024.
Then it compared those temperatures to cumulative human CO2 emissions.
They don't match.
From 1899 to 1940, the planet warmed at a rate of 0.022 C per year, even though emissions were low.
Then from 1941 to 1982, temperatures cooled, despite CO2 emissions more than tripling.
From 1983 to 2024, warming returned, but slower than before, at a rate of 0.017 C per year, even as emissions rose 8.6 times higher than during the earlier warming phase.
As the author concludes, "These findings challenge the conventional assumption that human-induced CO2 is the primary driver of global warming."
Nobel Physicist Says the IPCC’s Climate Crisis Claim Is Not Proven
What if the central math behind the climate crisis does not add up?
At The Heartland Institute’s 16th International Conference on Climate Change, Dr. John Clauser, introduced as the 2022 Nobel Prize winner in physics, argues that the IPCC’s climate crisis narrative rests on weak measurements, flawed assumptions, and adjusted data. Clauser focuses on Earth energy imbalance, the metric increasingly used to justify claims of global warming and climate emergency.
He challenges the use of temperature anomalies, questions satellite measurements from Terra and Aqua, critiques ocean heat content adjustments, and argues that climate models fail to show the kind of agreement needed for reliable policy decisions.
Clauser does not mince words. He says the evidence for a positive Earth energy imbalance has not been proven, and that governments are spending trillions on policies built on claims that deserve a serious audit.
Watch the full ICCC16 speech from The Heartland Institute, and subscribe for more presentations challenging the climate consensus. https://t.co/zuICkDGB7s via @YouTube
So CO2 has not warmed the South Pole! And in fact there have been record cold temps recorded by land based sensors in recent years. CO2 is not the control knob of climate.
🚨🇪🇺Dutch lawyer Meike Terhorst just shattered the EU’s illegal plans for mass control.
"The EU cannot impose anything on member states. EU is not a state and it is not a sovereign country - member states can therefore reject the DIGITAL IDENTITY."
Dr Tedros director general of the WHO has made much of the three tragic deaths in the Canary Islands attributed to the Hantavirus, but is not interested in investigating the estimated 19 million deaths and the 60 million disabled by the Covid 19 ‘vaccines’. Strange that ?
În prima lună de campanie, Nicușor a avut 5000 de voluntari coordonați pe WhatsApp și Discord să dea like, share și mass report (mai ales pe Facebook, la care aveau legături cu reprezentatul Meta din România). Voluntarii erau meniți să "se comporte ca boți" pentru că nu aveau voie să folosească boți. Au folosit "AI powered toolkits" de la un start-up din NY care a lucrat pentru campania lui Kamala Harris. Bine, complet normal, dar România a anulat alegeri pentru că Georgescu a avut voluntari pe Telegram.
Two independent studies have reached the same result: the Southern Ocean and Antarctica were warmer in the late 1970s and early 1980s than in recent decades.
Temperatures there peaked early, then cooled, even as atmospheric CO2 levels rose.
Vihma and Uotila show Southern Ocean air temperatures declining after the early satellite era. While Ma et al reconstruct Antarctic surface temperatures back to 1979 and confirm the same pattern: early warmth, later cooling.
If CO2 were driving the Antarctic climate, temperatures would have risen in line with emissions. But they did not.
Ole Humlum: Global surface air temperature April 2026 compared to the average of April during previous 10 years, and April 2025, using satellite data by AIRS v6 (https://t.co/WwC0LBGEZt), obtained from the GISS data portal (https://t.co/y0Q8UREWt9).
Link https://t.co/u4nkuayzYi