Sorry to rain on your parade, but this whole Voter ID crusade is a deception.
When it comes to "protecting the integrity of our elections," voter ID is at the bottom of the list.
Meaning if you want to protect the democratic process, there are significantly more important issues that warrant your attention.
Here's a brief analogy:
Imagine if a massive sinkhole formed in your neighborhood; damaging property; threatening lives and requiring immediate attention.
But while this is going on, an insufferable resident of your community demands that the entire neighborhood put everything on hold to instead help them repave their driveway.
In this case, that insufferable resident is the Republican Party.
Republicans will try to deceive you by telling you that voter ID policy is backed by bipartisan support and support from most Americans, but what they won't tell you is that they advocate for strict requirements which would exclude most basic forms of ID.
Americans support using these basic forms of ID to vote, but there is no data showing support for narrower requirements.
This is because such strict requirements would act more like an obstacle than a preventative measure.
Now, what's particularly disingenuous about this Republican obsession, is that voter ID is not the only policy they want to enact. Give them the chance and they will seize on it to roll back voting rights and impose widespread restraints. Voter ID is just a smokescreen in this scenario and this is a compelling reason for obstructing their suppressive agenda.
Note that US elections already have multiple layers of protection in place to prevent widespread election tampering.
Several safeguards, legal deterrents, eligibility requirements, audits and paper trails already exist and act as very effective measures against voter and election fraud.
Proof of citizenship requirements also exist and some states already require a form of identification to verify your eligibility.
Up till now, these measures have acted as an effective deterrent to fraud, but ever since Trump began denying elections without proof and lying to his voters so he could conspire to overturn the results of a free and fair election, those same voters have been pushing for needless policies that seek to address a fictional problem.
Adding another barrier to voting is unnecessary because it creates an additional and ineffective obstacle for those wanting to participate in the Democratic process.
Don't confuse majority support for basic ID requirements with majority support for the types of measures that Republicans are demanding.
And I can't state this enough. if given the chance, Republicans will implement voting restrictions along with voter ID requirements. They have indicated time and time again their desire to suppress the vote through multiple measures designed to make the voting process more challenging or meticulous for those that tend to vote against them.
It's also important to note that ID requirements exist in other countries because obtaining IDs in these countries is easier and voting is more accessible.
That is to say, in other countries, election and voting laws and polling procedures often make voting simpler and more convenient, but in the US, republican-backed voting laws, regulations and challenges tend to make it more difficult to vote—especially for citizens located in urban areas and cities
That said, even I support basic ID requirements as long as a few conditions are met:
1. That most forms of ID suffice.
2. That evidence and data are provided to support voter ID requirements. Otherwise, why would you advocate for implementing a policy that solves an imaginary problem, or fails to sufficiently solve that problem?
3. The last of my conditions would require that the government issues automatic ID cards to citizens once they reach a certain age or meet a certain set of criteria, and that these IDs can be used to vote.
(1/3)
But you would rather have us come to DM you or call service just to blame a router that is a few months out of date. A pathetic joke. There are 5 year old routers from Walmart that work just fine. Start taking some accountability.
@Ask_Spectrum Your company deserves the class actions. Spectrum service is nothing short of Pathetic.
The only way to make things right is to refund the months of garbage Internet speeds and interruptions / days with packet loss to the millions of people having these issues.
@FUXJOEBIDEN@charliekirk11@DNC The same people are dead already, you want to live in your boomer world where nothing changes or you get scared then be my guest, you have every right to do so. But to say things like “the same people” is crazy. Because firstly none of those people were citizens of United States.
@MAGAVoice The most American thing is to be open to other cultures. Period. Majority of America are immigrants from different time periods older and newer. The only majority doing crime are the ones that can’t afford a living because of other issues. Prove me wrong.
CONVICTED FELONS SHOULD NOT HOLD OFFICE
CONVICTED FELONS SHOULD NOT HOLD OFFICE
CONVICTED FELONS SHOULD NOT HOLD OFFICE
CONVICTED FELONS SHOULD NOT HOLD OFFICE
CONVICTED FELONS SHOULD NOT HOLD OFFICE
CONVICTED FELONS SHOULD NOT HOLD OFFICE
CONVICTED FELONS SHOULD NOT HOLD OFFICE
CONVICTED FELONS SHOULD NOT HOLD OFFICE