@DerLutheraner I had dropped NR a few months ago (not in protest or anything), and I was thinking maybe I’d missed something in the meantime. So I was going to do the same research later to check it. No big deal - we probably agree after all that. That’s Twitter in a nutshell!
I kind of don’t want to hear a damn thing about “economics” from people whose expert preferred policies led to an expensive war of choice putting another several hundred billion on the credit card, and a dangerous depletion of our stockpiles. These people couldn’t steward a two card baseball card collection without killing a thousand civilians, causing a refugee crisis and devaluing the general currency.
@DerLutheraner He’s constantly offering the contrarian take on their podcast. When he gets into a real debate with Charlie Cooke, it’s painful to listen to. NR has always allowed a variety of takes under their tent, which is great, but I don’t consider MBD anywhere near the middle of that tent.
@DrSmurfer@jayaygum It’s coming from the top. The US needed someone to come in and flip off the establishment, and got it - but it would have been preferable if it had not been someone who loved to run around flipping off everyone he saw.
@DerLutheraner MBD cares about conservative economics as much as Trump cares about just war theory. He’s using it as a convenient tool to leverage everyone’s rightful disgust with the Iran war into an argument against conservative economics. If a war is right, it’s worth $. If not, it’s not.
@DrSmurfer@jayaygum Sadly, I suspect many of the kids that would have leaned conservative have probably dismissed the idea by now. A 25-year-old wasn’t even paying attention to politics the last time “conservative” leaned toward anything intellectual.
@DerLutheraner I can imagine overlap between the topics, but I think refusing to consider an argument on one topic because someone has a bad take on another topic is a bad way to approach policy, which has never stopped MBD before.
@DerLutheraner Right about which topic? The one he is addressing (economics) or the completely unrelated topic on which basis he judges the first topic?