harry.fun

17年入场|从不马后炮！牛熊吹哨人｜做交易，我只用

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

所有你未达到的预期，都是因为你方法不对！因此赶快去学习！！很可能就带来立竿见影的效果！！

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@xueqiu88 @heyibinance 现在的女人能分走半边天

[如烟大帝🍒 @koreanswag__]

可甜可高冷非常有气质 在床上反差的一绝

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@BTCdayu 市场价值来自于市场分歧！如果没有价值洼地，高溢价买SpaceX的意义是什么

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@SSXWDP 兜里拿出卡黄挨个捅不犯毛病，属于自卫！自己进去待20年也要捅死这帮逼

[晓辉博士 @xiaohuiyuan]

仔细看了@Poteto分享的视频，认真做了笔记，回顾下几点心得：

1、要让更多Agent帮你干活，本质是还是构建信任trust，你怎么能相信这些agent能干出让你满意的活。所以验证很重要？如何确保Agent交付的是你想要的，这里面需要一些工程能力；

2、她分享的产品开发的Verification Skill由两部分组成：Feature Map和CLI，Feature Map特征地图是一种具体化的记忆，应该包含了这个软件是怎么运行的，有什么特点，用户如何使用它等等，让Agent在接收到用户或者开发者的问题之后，可以知道去哪里定位问题，找到相关的上下文，再尝试去解决问题；CLI让Agent拥有对电脑的控制能力，能让Agent运行应用、收集轨迹、证据，确认代码是否在跑，性能要求是否已经满足。我理解这里的CLI指的是一套封装好的、可以重复使用的代码，而不是每次agent都需要重新去写需要的代码。所以这个skill的文件夹会包含两个部分，一个跟产品特征有关，一个跟可复用的代码和能力有关。但我似乎对CLI的本质还不是特别清楚，需要再补补课。

3、什么时候需要纠正你的agent呢？她提了五个层次，分别是：（1）codebase；（2）static analysis (lint/compiler/Cl); (3) rules/bug bot; (4)skill; (5) style guide。其中，最重要的是codebase，这是最好的记忆形式，尽可能要保证codebase中的代码都是优质代码，是你放心让agent去抄的代码，如果不是，agent在模仿的过程中很容易去放大其中的一些问题。所以当遇到了重复出现的问题时，尽量重构，删掉所有的技术债。也可以把重复出现的错误，加到 lint rules，让Agent再次犯错成为不可能。她也提到后三个层次很难强制agent，所以尽可能要从codebase和lint的角度去纠正，保证代码质量。

4、她还介绍了一些用来开发Grok Bot的基础设施Dune的架构，这一部分我就看不太懂了，要理解的话，可能还需要补一些相关知识。感觉现阶段我可能也不太需要，就只是大概过了一下。

听的过程中，我也在思考我的日常工作的验证要怎么写，也开始写我常用工作流的验证了，先按照这个思路优化下试试。

[H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞 @justinsuntron]

Last night, my lawyers moved to sanction World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi for failing to disclose, until months into my litigation against the company, that it is a citizen of the UAE 🇦🇪 . #WLFI #USD1

For those who are new to this dispute, I was one of World Liberty’s earliest and largest investors.  In November 2024, I agreed to buy $30 million of $WLFI tokens under a Token Purchase Agreement with World Liberty, and I later increased my total investment to $45 million. 

In April, I sued World Liberty, alleging that the company induced my investment through fraud and then unlawfully froze my tokens.

My Token Purchase Agreement gives me the right to bring my claims in either California federal or state court. 

I chose federal court.

Federal courts can hear a case like mine only when the two sides come from different places.  Foreign plaintiffs like me can sue an American defendant in federal court, but foreign plaintiffs generally cannot sue a foreign defendant there.  For these purposes, a company like World Liberty takes on the citizenship of each of its owners, so a single foreign owner makes the company foreign. 

In other words, so long as World Liberty and all of its owners were American, my case could be heard in federal court.

The federal court’s rules required World Liberty to file a disclosure at the start of the case identifying every one of its owners and where each is a citizen.  World Liberty’s disclosure identified only one entity—World Liberty itself—and listed Florida as its sole citizenship.  Its lawyers certified that they were unaware of anyone else who needed to be disclosed.

World Liberty then moved to compel arbitration, seeking to pull my case out of open court and into secret arbitration proceedings. 

I opposed that motion, and my lawyers spent months and hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting it.  At a hearing in August, the Court signaled that it was not persuaded that my claims belonged in arbitration.  Instead, the Court ruled that certain of my claims should stay in open court, and certain claims should be sent to arbitration, and ordered the parties to meet and confer to come up with a proposed agreement on which claims stay in open court and which ones go to arbitration.

Less than a week later, World Liberty suddenly “corrected” its disclosure.  Where it had previously listed only one member in its ownership chain, it now listed 22, and claimed citizenship in Florida, Delaware, Puerto Rico, and the UAE. 

World Liberty now says that the federal court has no jurisdiction over my case, since its UAE citizenship means there are foreign parties on both sides of the case.

The irony is hard to miss.  World Liberty’s gold paper declares that “[b]y design, World Liberty Financial is not organized offshore,” and that it is “an American, tax-paying, corporation that aims to bring DeFi to its rightful home—America.”  It promises a “US-based decentralized platform” built on “American ideals of liberty, privacy, and freedom to transact,” calls private, intermediary-free transactions “a core American value,” and boasts that “[r]ather than shying away from the United States, World Liberty Financial embraces the United States as the future CRYPTO CAPITAL OF THE PLANET.”

World Liberty was proudly American 🇺🇸 when it was selling tokens.  It discovered its UAE 🇦🇪 roots only when it needed a way out of an American federal courtroom.

World Liberty presumably always knew who its owners were.  Its lawyers claim that they learned about the company’s UAE citizenship only after they filed the original disclosure. 

As my motion explains, if that is true, then either World Liberty’s lawyers failed to conduct appropriate diligence, or World Liberty did not give its lawyers a straight answer.  When we asked how this happened, World Liberty refused to tell us.

Token holders deserve to know whether the projects they invest in are telling the truth, both to the public and to courts.  I am filing this motion to hold World Liberty and its lawyers accountable for what I believe was a misleading disclosure to the Court, and to make sure that the cost of World Liberty’s gamesmanship falls on them, not on me. 

And after my sanctions motion is resolved in federal court, I will re-file my lawsuit against World Liberty in California state court.

I will keep fighting for the transparency this community deserves.

[Cointelegraph @Cointelegraph]

🚨 JUST IN: Justin Sun has moved to sanction World Liberty Financial, alleging it failed to disclose until months into his lawsuit that it holds UAE citizenship.

Sun says $WLFI first listed only Florida citizenship, then amended its disclosure to name 22 members across Florida, Delaware, Puerto Rico and the UAE, and now argues the federal court lacks jurisdiction over the case.

Sun, who invested $45M in WLFI and sued in April over alleged fraud and frozen tokens, says he will re-file in California state court once the sanctions motion is resolved.

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@munaguovuo 什么垃圾学校 13个人一个寝室？是一年一串寝？

[Andy L @AndyL5cc]

太夸张了！一个人指挥 50 多个 AI Agent，干了 20 个工程师的活！😱

一位曾在 Cursor 工作的 SpaceXAI 高级工程师，分享了她的 AI 自动化工作流：

每天早上喝杯咖啡，就能管理整个 AI 团队。

她的配置是：

1 个 AI 总管：统筹所有工作
3 个 AI 项目经理：分配任务、协调进度
40 多个 AI 员工：通宵自动执行任务

她还声称，97% 的 SpaceXAI 工程师已经在使用类似的工作方式。

她用一场 60 分钟的教程，从零教你搭建整套系统。

以前有人收费 5000 美元教的东西，现在直接公开了。

以后一个人就是一家软件公司，真不是开玩笑！🤣

建议收藏！

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@Luminana2026 @chouzi716 @qxunwnt @Kaneshiro1960 你咋这么能装逼呢？台湾不好你妈了逼，再不好农民一个月退休金200人民币啊？操你死妈的！你洗你妈个逼啊

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@lumi20202020 @Alex8282019 供需平衡的的问题！女少男少！还有男的怀孕你再看看！嫖一次多少钱？出去国外旅个游，买个名牌包多少钱？

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@adaabaabaddd @rming_luckin 他JB长脑袋上了

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@cuichenghao 你允许邻居把导弹瞄准你家窗户和门口吗？泽连斯基就是个傻逼，加入北约……打一顿老实了

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@ZJbtceth @BTCdayu “项目方在做事，哈哈！”什么好项目能来币圈融资？除了骗子，好项目VC钱都塞不进去！还好项目……

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

@BTCdayu 十年骗局，该收场了！没有新用户新的傻逼进来，赚钱效应越来越小，没接盘侠了，庄也懒得拉，恶性循环了

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

逗死了

[Alpha捕手 @alphahunter000]

不得不说，孙哥这回的采访，总结了10点交易和资产配置相关的，相当硬核

1. BTC长期仍是底仓，但不是无脑看多
最大尾部风险来自量子计算，Q-Day可能成为比特币真正的系统性黑天鹅。

2. ETH已经大幅减仓
去年在$3,600–4,000附近减掉八九成，至今没有明显买回，核心判断是高位筹码结构和叙事开始变差

3. 交易第一原则：不要和筹码谈恋爱
资产到了风险收益比恶化的位置，就应该卖，不因为过去赚过钱、长期看好就死拿。

4. 从ETH撤出的资金，主要转向美股
这说明他的核心思路不是“Crypto内部轮动”，而是在不同大类资产之间做风险收益切换。

5. 纳指中线偏谨慎，甚至微微看空
但目前还没有直接做空，说明他的判断是“高估+脆弱”，而不是马上崩盘。

6. 最警惕AI硬件链
尤其存储、光模块、芯片，当前资本开支和估值都很拥挤，未来存在类似2000年光纤过剩的风险。

7. AI真正的大机会在应用层
基础设施已经很贵，未来更可能出现十倍、几十倍机会的，是AI健康、AI服务、垂直应用。

8. Hyperliquid代表Crypto的新范式
重点不是再造一个公链，而是链上交易基础设施开始承接美股、永续、全球资产。

9. RWA是下一轮最值得关注的Crypto主线之一
USDT解决“全球持有美元”，下一步链上证券可能解决“全球持有美股、美债和其他金融资产”。

10. 整体仓位逻辑：降低拥挤资产，保留核心底仓，等待新范式

简单概括就是：BTC留底仓、ETH大减仓、美股配置增加、AI硬件谨慎、AI应用和RWA重点观察

[harry.fun @Ai_Native_China]

去鱼多的地方去打鱼，比如用ai爬取各大平台洗护日化评论区，找需求！只要数据量足够庞大，然后用最顶级的ai分析、策划营销方案！就能打到“鱼”

[AYi @AYi_AInotes]

三个亿万富翁，坐进一家爱尔兰小酒吧，
聊了 2 小时 14 分钟。

这绝逼是今年下半年最值得看的一场 AI 访谈，没有之一。

Meta 创始人兼 CEO 扎克伯格
Meta 首席 AI 官 Alexandr Wang
Stripe 联合创始人 John Collison 当主持

Meta 新模型 Muse Wonder 第一次被讲透：
用例 → 模型即产品 → Muse Wonder → 前沿模型怎么造

最离谱的一幕：Alexandr Wang 被老板当着镜头做了年度绩效评估。

全片中英文双语字幕给大家做好了，搞点烧烤，整点啤酒，今晚找个舒服的姿势享受其中吧。