भाजपा से ब्राह्मणों की नाराजगी पर डिप्टी केशव प्रसाद मौर्य ने जो ���ुछ भी कहा उस पर अजीत भारती की ये प्रतिक्रिया सुनिए 😂
कोई नहीं है टक्कर में, अजीत भारती 🔥
UPI Charges Row | Ashneer Grover Exclusive
If I transfer ₹1 lakh to my friend through UPI, or I pay ₹3,000 using a QR code, what is the cost of running the system? The cost is the same. So, if I transfer ₹1 lakh to my friend, nobody is making money from it. But if I make a payment of ₹2,500 to a small shopkeeper then the government wants to put charges, what’s the logic? — @Ashneer_Grover speaks to @shreyadhoundial
Dear @Javedakhtarjadu. I'm afraid your response is as boring and overloaded as your similes and metaphors. When countered with facts, you shift the goalpost, bring in the RSS, berate the right wing, take refuge in context, cushion the bigotry, and claim Kafirs were Colonialists not Hindus.
I know countering you again is like watering a cactus and praying for leechis, but in the hope that all that knee massaging with Doctor Ortho would have sprouted some neurons, here goes:
You asked for a source because you said the quote was “quite unlike” Azad’s “lifelong sociopolitical stances.” I gave you the source: Calcutta, 27 October 1914, published in Khutbat-e-Azad. The words are his. That should have ended the enquiry. It did not. So let us walk through your new script, line by line.
1. “The khutbats were about Khilafat and British colonialism.”
Yes. That is what I wrote. Maulana Azad was telling Indian Muslims that a Turk’s battlefield thorn must be felt in a Hindustani Muslim’s heart; that Millat-e-Islam is one body; that friendship and enmity are for the religion of Allah. Then he quoted Quran 48:29 and added his own gloss: be extremely hard against disbelievers, extremely kind among yourselves, and do not pass over this as if you had not heard it. You asked for the when and where. You received both. “It was about Khilafat” is not a rebuttal. It is the context in which he said it.
2. “To claim he was quoting this about the Hindus of India will not be true. The Kafir here was the colonialist.”
I did not say the 1914 speech was a municipal circular against the Hindus of Howrah. I quoted what Azad quoted: a Quranic verse about kuffar, and his commentary on unbelief, Tawhid, and hardness toward disbelievers. If Azad had meant “kafir = only the British officer,” he knew Urdu enough to say Angrez. He did not. He used the Book’s word, then told his flock not to skip it.
And if “kafir” in Azad’s mouth was a temporary colonial nickname, kindly explain the 1920 Hijrat fatwa, published in Ahl-e-Hadith of Amritsar, in which he said Indian Muslims had no choice but to migrate, and that those who stayed and kept connection with “the enemy of Islam” would themselves be counted as the enemy of Islam. That is not a lecture on income-tax collectors. That is a theology of the land.
3. “When Ataturk took over, Azad called it a closed chapter and condoned the secular government.”
Men change. Texts do not. If later Azad made peace with the death of the Caliphate, good for the later Azad. It does not unsay 1914, nor the Khilafat years, nor Masala-e-Khilafat, nor the call that any government hostile to Turkey was hostile to Islam, not the belief in the Quranic verse damning the Kafirs. You began by saying the paragraph was unlike his lifelong stances. Lifelong includes the years he spent as a pan-Islamist firebrand. Evolution is not an eraser. It is a timeline.
4. “Read his Calcutta High Court statement. An honour no member of the Mahasabha or RSS was ever given.”
Sedition charges from the Raj are not a unique family heirloom. Tilak got them. Aurobindo got them. Savarkar was given two life terms and sent to Cellular Jail, where the honour included the oil mill, the lash, and years in a cell the size of a cupboard.
And of course, knowing your pitiful knowledge of Indian History, I guess you would not know legendary RSS names like Devipad Chaudhary, Jagatpati Kumar, Anna Saheb Deshpande, Ramakant Keshav, Vasantrao Oak, Narayan Singh, Chandrakant Bhardwaj, Dada Naik Chimur, Baburao Begade, Lala Hansraj, Balaji Raipurkar who participated in our freedom struggle and were jailed or shot.
5. “Azad was in British jails for nine years. Name one from your right wing who can match that.”
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar: roughly a decade in Kala Pani, further years in mainland jails, then thirteen years of internment in Ratnagiri. Sentence on paper: fifty years. Conditions: not Ahmednagar Fort with time to write Ghubar-e-Khatir.
By the way, you might know that your great-great-grandfather Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi was also incarcerated at Kala Pani. What you might not know, or would want to hide, is that he wrote a grovelling mercy petition to the British, pleading to be released.
6. “In 1946 Jinnah refused to shake Azad’s hand. He hated Azad for his patriotism.”
How does this turn “be severe against the kafirs, merciful among themselves” into a sonnet about communal harmony? A man can spend 1946 refusing Partition and still have spent 1914 telling Indian Muslims that their first body is the ummah. Fairness is holding both pages open. What you are doing is hiding the 1914 page and waving the 1946 one like a flag.
7. “Your reference to Rahul Gandhi was unnecessary, I expect decency and class.”
And I expected you to have some sense of humour. The PS was a reminder that this is the second time I have had to fetch your hero’s paperwork. Last time it was Nehru’s India: books banned, editors sacked, films blocked, Majrooh jailed for a couplet.
You lecture me on class after moving from “this cannot be Azad” to “it is Azad but you must read kafir as colonialist” to “anyway he went to jail” to “Jinnah was rude to him” to “please don’t mention Rahul.” That is not class. That is a guided tour of every exit except the text.
Look, Javed sahab, let us end this here. I like you. Doubtless a lot of your work is incredible, truly it is. So in that spirit, permit me to pen an ode to you:
Javed Akhtar ko dekha toh aisa laga, jaise chhal ka nawab, jaise jhoot ki kitaab, jaise dhong ki kiran, jaise adambar ka van, jaise kapton ki baat, jaise pakhand ki raat, jaise janpath mein ho ek jalta diya.
Alvida, Shabba khair. WDTP
I had told U that Justice for SSR will come but INDIRECTLY through other case.
MOST SHOCKING CLAIMS BY DISHA SALIAN'S FATHER'S LAWYER😳
👉Aditya Thackeray was involved in child sex abuse & drugs supply. Personally consumes drugs too.
👉Disha had video evidences & she forwarded to SSR
👉Aditya & his gang r@ped & killed Disha
👉SSR was to hold Press Conference on it, he told Rhea Chakraborty about it.
👉Rhea, part of same drug peddling gang, told this to Aditya.
👉 There after, Aditya & his gang killed SSR.
👉The entire story of Disha's alleged suicide has been proved false by CCTV. So this entire cover-up means these were all proofs.
👉The court found substance in the prima facie case, hence gave the matter to the CBI.
👉Aditya Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi, Aaditya Thackeray's bodyguard, Rohan Roy, Rhea Chakraborty, Param Bir Singh, then DCP Vishal Thakur, and the police officer who made false records, the PI of Malwani police station, and members of the SIT all are made accused in FIR.
👉The doctor Sanjay Yadav, who made a false post-mortem report & the chemical analyst of the forensic lab who changed the report of gang rape, are also included in FIR.
This is getting damn serious now.
That we watch this in silence & merely outrage on social media, with the government of India not pushing (visibly at least) the Jehadi govt of Bangladesh, says a lot about us as a nation, civilisation and people sadly !
Ajeet Bharti challenge the Modi gov : Take me to jail
I want this issue to be discussed in court, especially the behaviour of Bhimtas towards our gcs , the way they speak about our daughters and sisters, and why the gov is not taking action against such remarks🔥
तुमने कहा अगर तुम्हारे साथ बलात्कार होता ?
पहली बात तो तेरे साथ कोई बलात्कार करेगा नहीं क्युकी फ़िल्म इंडस्ट्री में तुम जैसी फ्लॉप C ग्रेड हीरोइन पैसे लेकर कुछ भी करने को तैयार रहती है,
तुम जैसे लोगो के लिए शरीर खोल कर #### देना, ये सब normal है
रही बात रानी पद्मिनी माता की तो तुम उसकी नौकर बनने ला��क भी नहीं इसलिए उन महान महिलाओं से अपनी तुलना करना भी मत,
और जहाँ तक जौहर का सवाल है तो वे सारी महिलाये “रेप विक्टिम” नहीं थी, जैसा तू तर्क दे रही है,
मुगलों के हरम में रहकर सेक्स स्लेव��ी ना करनी पड़े इसलिए उन्होंने जौहर करना बेहतर समझा,
क्युकी किसी पवित्र स्त्री के लिए उसकी इज़्ज़त मान सम्मान ही सब कुछ होता है,
मगर तुम नहीं समझ सकती C ग्रेड जिहादन क्युकी तूम तो ख़ुद किसी मुग़ल की नाजायज़ औलाद के वंश के साथ निकाह करके रह रही हो।
@ReallySwara Yezidi women preferred to burn, committed suicide than become sex slaves of your favorite ISIS jihadi rapists.
This talk of honor is just an elaborate spin to paper over Islamic rape jihad. THAT is the core issue, not women's actions and agency.
अजीत भारती पर केस करना वाले कंप्लेनेंट का ना�� है “बालकराम बौद्ध”
अगर कंप्लेनेंट बौद्ध धर्म से आता है तो SC/ST एक्ट कैसे लागू होता है ?
और अगर चंद्रशेखर रावण के लिए बोला गया है तो कोई third party वो भी Non SC कैसे फ़रियादी बन सकता है ? @ajeetbharti
@DelhiPolice क़ानून का दुरुपयोग करना इसे कहते है। @gupta_rekha
Cc @narendramodi @AmitShah
As the buzz around the Jantar Mantar protest dies down, Madhya Pradesh is back in the news.
SDM Ram Niwas of Panna district ordered two mobile covers worth ₹120 from Flipkart.
When the delivery boy arrived with the sealed package, the SDM opened it and found only one mobile cover instead of two. Rather than raising a complaint with Flipkart, he allegedly abused the delivery boy and demanded an immediate refund.
The delivery boy dared to tell His Lordship that that's not how e-commerce works. He explained that the parcel was sealed, that it was likely a packing or logistics error, and that the proper course was to raise a complaint with Flipkart, which would handle the resolution through its return process.
His Lordship took offense at being told how the process worked. He allegedly called the police, and the delivery boy was reportedly arrested under Section 151 of the BNSS.
(Source: Aaj Tak)
ये रविंद्र जठेड़ी जी हैं, जो पिछले 77 दिनों से आमरण अनशन कर रहे हैं-भेदभाव पूर्ण SC/ST एक्ट और आरक्षण व्यवस्था के ख़िलाफ़!
इनकी हालत नाज़ुक है, लेकिन अफ़सोस है की ये 77 दिन बाद भी उतने ही अकेले हैं, जितना तब जब इन्होंने अनशन शुरू किया था!
@RJatheri जी से हाथ जोड़कर अनुरोध है कि ये अपना अनशन खत्म करें,, ये देश भीड़तंत्र से चलता है! अगर इनके पीछे भीड़ नहीं, तो इनकी आवाज़ किसी के कानों ���क नहीं पहुंचेगी!
इसलिए कृपया करके अभी के लिए ये आंदोलन छोड़ कर, अपनी सेहत पर ध्यान दें!🙏🙏
It’s been 75 days since this video surfaced on Social Media. In the days of Facial Recognition Technology and a strong intelligence network; Were we able to identify and arrest these individuals @AshwiniVaishnaw ji?