Up for buying a few pure Indian hardware products.
Just to do my bit of becoming an early adopter.
Will try prototypes too.
🇮🇳🚀
Comment /DM what you have built.
EV DOCTOR™ just got its biggest upgrade yet. 🚀
Powered by our new battery agentic Battery OS platform working in the backend, this release puts real battery diagnostic intelligence in your hands:
- Our most accurate battery testing technology, ready to use
- Instant, printable PDF reports for every test
- A cleaner, faster interface anyone can operate
- Advanced, reliable ML models that detect safety risks, health, performance, and 10 distinct ground faults (deep discharge, water damage, imbalance, and more)
No more guessing. Just real proof.
This is the update we've been waiting to ship.
More at https://t.co/bCMNRqwLub
Well done, Battery Ok Technologies (@batteryoktech) team . 👏
#electricvehicles #batteries #batteryok
Any Indian or global media platform interested in covering the story and impact of EV DOCTOR™?
We’re building reliable battery diagnostics tech from India for the world helping EV owners, garages, fleets, OEMs, and service networks move from guesswork to real proof.
If you’re the right person, or know someone who covers EVs, climate tech, mobility, hardware, or deep-tech startups, tag them or DM.
Would love to tell the story.
🇮🇳🚀
R&D is not about reverse engineering.
China is at 2.69% GERD.
India is at 0.65%.
That gap is not a policy failure.
It's a compounding failure.
China crossed 1% in 2000.
India crossed 0.8% briefly around 2008 and has been drifting downward since.
What happened in between: China built CATL, SMIC, Huawei, DJI, and the world's largest EV supply chain. India built services exports and called it a knowledge economy.
R&D intensity isn't just an input metric.
It's the rate at which a country converts capital into defensible capability.
At 0.65% of a $3.5T GDP, India spends roughly $23B on R&D annually.
China at 2.69% of a $18T economy is spending north of $480B.
The gap is not 4x.
It's closer to 20x in absolute rupees.
PLI gets announced.
R&D doesn't compound overnight.
The gap in the chart took 28 years to open. It will take at least that long to close, and only if the money starts moving now.
You can't build a secondary market for efficiency assets bonds, securitized savings streams, and insurance products on unverified performance data. That's why the energy efficiency finance market is small. Not because the savings aren't real. Because nobody measured them properly
What's complicated is that the entire ESCO model in India is built on projected savings, not verified ones. The PPA gets signed, the equipment goes in, the invoice goes out, and nobody runs Option A or Option B post-implementation because the contract didn't require it.