@one_sheep_among@KhalilAndani 6. So what? Jesus sends a way the cananite woman multiple times, even calls her a dog. Show me the prophet ever doing something like this.
@one_sheep_among@KhalilAndani 3. Marrying someones ex wife who is a son by name but not in reality is weird? Proof?
4/5. So? Prophets have special favours. Why did David not get stoned for the vile sin you swine attribute to him?
@vintageversus@KhalilAndani So you do know the zutt argument is a misrepresentation and totally faulty, yet since you are a disingenuous pagan you still run it?
Way to expose your dishonesty. Retard polytheist.
🚨BREAKING:
The biggest Christian apologist @GodLogic_GL ADMITS there are two Gods in Christianity!
“If there is no trinity in the Old Testament, then why are there 2 Yahwehs ?”
2 Yahwehs in a sense ?
@vintageversus@muslimorthodoxy@GodLogic_GL No it means there is one company and not multiple distinct companies.
You say genesis implies multiple distinct persons 🤣
Retarded moron
Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah on physically fighting the callers to shirk, innovation, falsehood and alteration of the religion
• Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah said:
❝The disputed issues are either those in which there is no armed struggle, but rather debate, clarification, argument, and proof, and this is striving with the tongue; or they are issues in which there is armed jihād, in which case it is against whoever opposes the Sunnah and the Messenger, not against whoever follows the Book, the Sunnah, and what the predecessors of the nation were upon. Thus, in every case, it has become clear that the objector (al-Akhnāʾī) and those like him—among the people of innovation, misguidance, falsehood, ignorance, alteration of the religion, and changing the law of the Seal of the Messengers—are more deserving of having jihād carried out against them by hand and tongue according to ability. In what they deemed lawful of fighting the people of knowledge and the Sunnah, they are of the same kind as the renegade Khārijites; indeed, they are worse than those, for those people did not call to polytheism and disobedience to the Messenger.❞
📚 (Al-Radd ʿAlā al-Akhnāʾī p. 478)
Ibn al-Uthymeen narrated story of a man in
"فتح ذي الجلال والإكرام بشرح بلوغ المرام"
The story is as follow:
I saw a man walking between Safā and Marwah who had shaved only the right side of his head, while the left side still had all its hair. I asked him, What is this?
1/2
Ibn ‘Aqīl said:
❝A Ḥanbalī [referring to himself] said, in his argument against someone who regarded the slaughter of animals under the religious laws as ugly:
‘There is no disagreement among rational people that putting an animal to death combines the pain of slaughter with the pain of the soul being taken, and perhaps the latter is worse than slaughter. Yet Allāh has commanded the angels to take our souls, even though we are the most noble of the beasts, and we bear the obligation of worship and the burdens of legal responsibility.
So consider that Allāh has made us responsible for taking the souls of beasts, or ending their lives, just as the angels take our souls from us, and thus, in ending the lives of beasts, we are like them.’❞
Source: Kitāb al-Funūn 2/110
@ithinkitmyway@muslimorthodoxy isaiah 53 is talking about the future.
There is 0 reason to assume its not talking about the righteous remnant of Israel. isaiah 52 and 53 are connected.
(Those described in 52 speak in 53, those observing Zion.)
Additionally the servant is identified as Israel before.