Back in the late 1800s and early 1900s when millions of immigrants flooded our shores, no paperwork was required to immigrate. No passports, visas, or work permits. Anyone who could afford a ticket could board a ship, arrive in America, answer a few basic questions, and be on their way.
They could stay as long as they wanted, work wherever they wanted, buy property, start businesses, and basically do anything any American citizen could do. In fact, in most states, they could legally vote in local, state, and even national elections, subject to the same poll tax, literacy test, or other qualifications required of American citizens.
If they wanted to naturalize, they just needed to register their intent and were given seven years to complete the paperwork necessary to become American citizens, which millions of immigrants were proud to do.
Things began to change in the 1930s with the advent of social security numbers, and then more so with the Alien Registration Act of 1940, signed into law as a WWII security measure. When the war ended, instead of being repealed, in 1946 it evolved into what we now call Green Cards.
In effect, we had completely open borders and the country thrived. In fact, during the decades we now call the Gilded Age—the high-growth period that Donald Trump claims he wants to emulate—our borders were wide open. The reason this worked so well is that we had no welfare state. People came to America for freedom and opportunity only. They came to contribute to our economy, not live off it. They did not drain our resources; they added to them.
The lesson is that immigration is not the problem. The problem is the welfare state. Shut off that magnet and America will no longer attract people looking for free stuff. In fact, we need to turn off that magnet for everyone, so those who are looking for free stuff will leave to seek it out someplace else.
Food is not a "human right" because you are not entitled to someone else's labor, time or property.
You have a right to not be aggressed against and may seek food through production, trade or voluntary charity.
However, to argue otherwise is to assert a claim over other people's bodies and capital, which is aggression and tantamount to slavery.
POTUS should pull our troops & ships out of range. All it would take is one lucky strike from the Iranians to escalate this on their terms.
Don’t wait for disaster to strike—get our troops out & declare victory at home.
Use the economic leverage we have to offer sanctions relief & unfreezing of assets in exchange for opening the SOH. Getting the SOH open should be our only goal.
There is no military solution, and the Iranians have said they won’t give Trump a deal. Walk away and reset the rules on our terms. Restrain the Israelis, get out of the Middle East, and focus on issues here at home. America and Americans first, always.
The defining political question of our time is whether the United States of America is a nation that exists for the benefit of her people, or an economic zone and welfare machine that exists for the benefit of everyone else.
Let me reframe the Trump/Vance child care credit argument for you in simple economic terms.
Option 1) The government cuts my taxes by $9,000. I keep the $9,000 and my family is benefitted by the whole amount.
Option 2) The government gives a $9,000 credit to "stay-at-home moms." In order to give that credit, the government has to take approximately $19,000 dollars from taxpayers to pay for administration and distribution of the funds, and for the 50% of funds (conservatively estimated) that will go toward fraud and waste.
This is a no-brainer. End the government handouts. Reduce taxes, cut spending, prosecute fraud, let the free market work.
I’m open to the idea of giving married stay at home families 9k a year to incentivize parents spending more time with their kids.
But, wouldn’t it make more sense to just exempt the working parents from Federal taxes instead of a new social program?
Married couples with a SAHM should honestly just get 25% off their taxes for each child. It would be an even greater windfall for families, it would be a much easier sell to the base, and it would be completely useless for the welfare parasite class.
A DEVELOPER BUILT THIS GLOWING FORT LAUDERDALE HOME IN 14 MONTHS. NOW IT'S FETCHING $51 MILLION
Fort Lauderdale developer Dov Stark bought the waterfront lot for $5.5 million in 2024, demolished the existing house, then spent more than $35 million building its replacement.
Instead of another white Florida mansion, he wrapped the home in backlit quartzite designed to glow from within after dark.
The buyers had been touring homes in Miami Beach and Golden Beach but reportedly cancelled their remaining appointments after seeing this one.
The roughly 15,000-square-foot house has an 80-foot infinity pool, 145 feet of waterfront and a living room separated from its eight-car garage by a wall of glass.
Even the sauna glows, with a backlit Himalayan salt wall.