@Hughgee7@TalkTV@JuliaHB1@AllisonPearson So if someone incites violence or terrorism that’s ok? I was brought up to understand right and wrong. I was brought up to understand a duty to protect. “Sticks and stones “ isn’t relevant. Someone being offended isn’t relevant. Learn the law please.
@McLarenF1Fan25@Quelxes@Formula1Wimbo@HillF1 He is one that does. Others disagree. Like Toto. But wouldn’t you agree that that’s a discussion for before the race, not a change in policy during the race, in public? Mercedes won their world championships and McLaren prior to that without a clear no.1 driver.
@McLarenF1Fan25@Quelxes@Formula1Wimbo@HillF1 Yet many formula 1 teams with all their experience, expertise and data analysis disagree with you. So do I. Doesn’t it make you pause? Or are you just more clever than them?
@McLarenF1Fan25@Quelxes@Formula1Wimbo@HillF1 I think Lando is more likely to be world champion if he works with the team and not defy them. If he plays fair with Oscar he is likely to get team assistance. It’s the constructors title that is more likely for McLaren anyway.
@McLarenF1Fan25@Quelxes@Formula1Wimbo@HillF1 It’s fairness. It’s what they agreed in their strategy meeting before the race. They wanted a 1-2 for the ream and agreed to work together to get it.
@McLarenF1Fan25@Formula1Wimbo@HillF1 I do understand it. That’s why my comment is valid. Or are you claiming that they are not teammates? Did I miss Oscar moving to Ferrari?
@McLarenF1Fan25@Formula1Wimbo@HillF1 So you accept it’s nothing like match fixing. Good.
It will not. Your logic is faulty. The only reason he was ahead was because he had agreed to work as a team. He was pitted first. So he was gifted the lead by the team then asked to hand it back out of team ethic.