I build MT5 EAs and indicators, about ten systems so far. I’ll go through them here one by one: backtest vs live for the same period, and the pitfalls in between.
First: Mercaria Unicorn EURUSD EA. Real account since June, 1,591 trades, verified on Myfxbook (link in bio).
Max drawdown in a backtest is the best case, not the worst case.
Aug 31–Sep 9 on my EURUSD EA: tester 18%, live 32.7%.
That gap is why I size risk from live drawdown, not from the report.
Question for people running EAs on EURUSD or GOLD:
Do you validate with walk-forward, or one backtest on the full history?
If you switched from one to the other, what made you switch?
@martinfxtrade Everyone in the market pays a different price for their lessons - just like some people are fine spending a couple of thousand dollars on clothes, while for others, a couple hundred is already a lot.
We all pay a different price for our level of growth.
@ValeriyBreakout It depends on how frequently these setups occur. One to three a month is one thing; one to three a day is completely different. What are you talking about?
AI simply doesn’t know all the pitfalls of working with MT5.
Tested in practice: I gave Claude full access to MT5 and had it run tests over a period when the EA was trading live. The results didn’t even come close to reality.
On my page, I show the difference between backtesting and real trading.
Live since June, my EURUSD EA:
1,662 trades, 75% won, +2,037 pips, +$490.
A 75% win rate means little on its own. What matters is what the losing 25% cost.
Who else runs an EA on a verified live account? What’s your win rate?
@Alifxp1122@tradermike1234 The journey belongs to those who keep moving.
Beyond trading strategies and basic AI skills, you need to understand a wide range of fields: basic programming, economics and politics, digital hygiene, security, and much more.
Direct experience is the ultimate teacher.
7 red flags I check in every MT5 backtest report before I trust an EA:
1. Not real ticks
2. Spread set to current
3. Commission = 0
4. Under 200 trades
5. Top-5 trades = most of the profit
6. PF above 3 with tiny drawdown
7. No out - of - sample
I see number 5 most often.
@Quantradin But what if you catch a gap in the tick data from your liquidity provider? Could that either prevent a trade from opening or create false entry conditions?
Whatever settings you pick in the MT5 tester, live execution will still differ.
Tuning the tester closer to live helps you read results. It doesn’t make the EA work.
What makes it work: logic that stays profitable when fills, timing and trade count don’t match the backtest.
@Quantradin Great line of thought! But you have to consider what the logic is based on: do you need a new candle, a candle window, or tick/indicator impulses?
Looks like your description pegs a noob trader as someone with $100 trying to turn it into $100k, while a pro is sitting on $100k+ and barely has to break a sweat to make a living.
The psychology behind $100 vs $100k is night and day, just like the lifestyle and mindset toward money.
Trading and charts are spatial phenomena, not linear ones. You have to account for everything.