Two Kinds of Free Speech
Chinese nationalists love telling the West: "You don't have real free speech either."
Okay. Let's compare. Not slogans, cases.
In China, the powerful have a name that can't be touched.
Luo Changping, a former investigative journalist, wrote one sarcastic post about Chinese soldiers in the Korean War movie hype. Sentenced to 7 months in prison (2022) for "damaging the reputation of heroes and martyrs."
Qiu Ziming, a blogger with 2.5 million followers, questioned the official death toll from the Galwan border clash. Sentenced to 8 months (2021), and made to apologize on state TV.
BYD sued a car blogger for trashing its cars and won ¥313,800 plus a public apology. Regulators shut his account down on top of that.
And when a car review site proves a problem? In October, Dongchedi bought brand-new Huawei-backed Zunjie V800s with its own money and slammed the brakes from 100 km/h. In three cars out of three, the brake pedal bracket snapped. One car had 3 km on it.
The government did open an investigation into the car. But within about a week, the test videos had vanished from Douyin, WeChat, Bilibili, Weibo, even Dongchedi's own app. No one has explained who ordered it.
A broken brake is a safety issue. A video of a broken brake, apparently, is a bigger one.
But ordinary people have no name at all.
Zheng Linghua, 23, dyed her hair pink and posted a photo with her grandfather to celebrate getting into grad school. Strangers called her a whore, a "demon," an old man's mistress. She tried to fight back legally: months of collecting evidence, chasing platforms, finding lawyers. She was diagnosed with depression. She died in January 2023.
No 7 months for anyone. No state TV apology. Her abusers just moved on to the next target.
Now look at America.
You can call the President an idiot, a fascist, a clown, every day, on TV, and nothing happens. That's not a loophole. The Supreme Court built it on purpose. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964): public figures must prove "actual malice" to win a defamation case. Hustler v. Falwell (1988): you can even mock a famous preacher in a vulgar parody. The more power you have, the more criticism you have to take.
But there's still a line. Threats aren't speech. Last month in Kansas, a 24-year-old commented "Let's shoot Trump" on Facebook before a rally. Federal agents arrested him within days.
And when the powerful attack the powerless? Two Black election workers in Georgia, Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Moss, were falsely accused by Rudy Giuliani, Trump's own lawyer, of rigging the 2020 election. They got death threats. They sued. A jury awarded them $148 million.
Sandy Hook parents were told by Alex Jones that their murdered children were "actors." Courts ordered him to pay over $1.4 billion.
Ordinary people, beating the most powerful men in the room.
So here's the difference.
In China, freedom points down. You can't touch the people above you, so you're "free" to crush the people below you. Free to bully a girl with pink hair. Free to call a foreign athlete a monkey. Free to dox a stranger. That's not freedom. That's permission.
In America, freedom points up. Mock the President all you want. But if you lie about a nobody and wreck her life, the law, and usually a crowd of strangers online, comes for you.
Lu Xun wrote this almost exactly 100 years ago:
勇者愤怒,抽刃向更强者;怯者愤怒,却抽刃向更弱者。
"The brave, when angry, draw their blade against the stronger. The coward, when angry, draws it against the weaker."
A civilized country isn't one that bows to the strong and stomps on the weak.
So I'll ask you: which freedom would you want? The freedom to criticize those in power, or the freedom to bully those who can't fight back?
The China I love is made of people who stand up for what's right, not social Darwinists who kneel to the strong and prey on the weak.
In America, criticizing the government is a national hobby.
In China, comparing the leader to Winnie the Pooh is a national security threat.
One country lets you say the emperor has no clothes.
The other bans the bear for looking too much like the emperor — then insists the clothes are magnificent.
Today:
60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck and we have the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major nation.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk owns more wealth than the bottom 53% of households and the 1% have never ever had it so good
Not acceptable
We need an economy that works for all, not just the few.
Nothing surprising here. China has been running the same play for years—recruit people with access, build relationships, and extract technology or influence. Remember Micron? Chinese entities systematically poached talent and stole DRAM IP on a massive scale. Now it’s the same logic applied to Nvidia’s AI chips and the CEO who has been lobbying hardest to loosen export controls. The method evolves; the objective doesn’t.
Breaking News: Secretary of State Marco Rubio had warned Trump officials that Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang, was entangled with a Chinese spy, multiple people briefed on the matter said. https://t.co/Zz2cqRZa58
The west is clearly not prepared to deal with China's incredibly aggressive espionage. We see this with the Nvidia case and this story from the UK.
A businessman from Britain was collecting compromising information on UK politicians. The FBI had him arrested in Serbia for trying to steal US military technology. He escaped to China on a chartered jet.
The Chinese government is using the same espionage networks to steal technology and terrorize regime critics. They support these networks with unlimited funds and even free flights to avoid prosecution.
6/
A Chinese citizen can work in Beijing or Shanghai for 15–20 years and still be treated as a temporary outsider.
Their kids often have fewer practical rights than the children of undocumented immigrants in America.
That’s the hukou system.
5/
Compare that to unauthorized immigrants in the U.S.:
Their children have a constitutional right to free public K-12 education (Plyler v. Doe)
They have access to emergency medical care
4/
In 2017, after a fire in Beijing’s Daxing district killed 19 people (mostly migrants), the city launched a mass eviction campaign. Tens of thousands of migrant workers were forced out in winter. Officials referred to them as the “low-end population.”
3/
A Chinese rural worker moves to Shanghai or Beijing:
Local hukou is extremely hard to get, even after years of work and social insurance
Kids face major barriers to public schooling
Many must return to their hometown for high school and the gaokao