Think businesses don't matter for interstate conflict? Think they do matter? Before answering those questions we need to think critically about which businesses, and why, will oppose interstate wars. My new article in @bap_journal does just that! https://t.co/eDhTgYVXrm
nobody will remember:
- your salary
- how busy you were
- how much you worked
people will remember:
-how you courageously kept buying more books despite your growing TBR pile.
@SeanMolloyIR @ProfPaulPoast @lucian_ashworth @DrIanHall Great to see such a close reading of Mahan! Intriguing how much of his work was memory-holed by contemporary scholars (particularly ārealistsā). Folks still look to and cite āThe Influence of Sea Powerā while ignoring his other work ā which was just as influential in its time.
Gartner HR expert Alexander Kirss spoke with @CNBCMakeIt in depth about why CEOs are leaving at record rates.
Read the full article here: https://t.co/Gq2hVBfOGx
#GartnerHR#GreatResignation#CEO
Global supply chains have become new economic weapons for great powers. In this article with @mevers90, we develop a structural theory of business-state relations and show how power transitions affect a state's ability to exercise economic statecraft 1/n https://t.co/PbWEicko24
The thing Iāll remember from the scene outside the Roosevelt Hotel this week isnāt just the asylum seekers sleeping on the sidewalks, itās the happy hour revelers drinking Aperol spritzes at outdoor tables just feet away
https://t.co/Hr3sH9rjqa
Love folks that study nukes and deterrence, but when a single funder dumps more than $100 million into your sub-field over 6 years and you canāt use that to set up a sustainable research ecosystem, itās hard to blame the funder. And MacArthur was just one of many funders.
āPayā as in materially optimal? Absolutely not. Even conquest of the Middle East, i.e. a massive hydrocarbon reserve, isnāt materially optimal my dude. Taking Taiwan would be a lesser prize. See Coe and Markowitz: https://t.co/Hyg6JOnLAX
One really important thing to bear in mind:
A successful war against America would pay off very handsomely for China. People seem to assume China would only go to war out of being backed into a corner. This isn't necessarily true. We have to remember that war can indeed pay. 1/
Until a geopolitical incident affects their cash flow, they ignore them. This is why itās so hard to get companies to be proactive, why so many got caught flat footed in February 2022, why employees suffer from snap decisions made in a crisisā¦
Any historians of RAND have a guess at who the āAdamā that Roberta Wohlstetter gifted this signed copy of Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision to might be? Referred to as a āmaster magicianā while the book is dedicated to her āfavorite magicianā (which Iām assuming is Albert?).
Wendell Wilkieās mid-war travelogue, signed by the politician turned globe trotter. Why bother purchasing these relics? Because itās easy to be nostalgic for the past, and itās comforting to reflect on how other generations confronted their challenges in our own difficult times.
The A. J. Liebling collection is filling out nicely with these two (relative) rarities. Both marked first editions. One of the most famous early writers for The New Yorker, Lieblingās dispatches as a war correspondent in World War II are also not to be missed!
First edition, fourth printing of Hans Morgenthauās āPolitics Among Nationsāā¦.no dust jacket but only $20! Iām sure some IR person on here is interestedā¦.(not my listing) https://t.co/k7RdUAAbM3
Understanding businessesā role in foreign security policy has never been more important: āStill, both EuĀrope and the U.S. will find that deĀcouĀpling deĀpends not just on poliĀcies but on comĀpansies, who are moĀtiĀvated by sales, not ideĀolĀogy.ā https://t.co/1iKJ6teq6D
This book that argues access to oil is part of the United Statesā ānational interestā was published in 1944, but I bet you could find an analogous example every few years from then until 2003. In fact *all* the books in this series are vintage examples of well worn arguments!
@calvinthrall @mollymmelin Just as long as you use my work as a jumping off point for a discussion of how firm-level theories can improve on industry-level theories. I never got down to the firm-level so that space is wide open for someone smarter than me (hint, hint).