"but" ... it's the State if California that is being sued and when he loses in court, doesn't the settlement come out of the taxpayers coffers? So who is being punished here; its certainly not Newsom. ..... I don't know, just askin'.
So, I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, I get that. One thing that I questioned within myself ...
stay with me here ....
Recently, the DOJ is , as its voiced all over social media, suing Gavin Newsom about the Gerrymandering going on, Yada Yada Yada,... OK, I get it..
@DaveRoetman@jsolomonReports Exactly.
Turn the tables on the purveyors and the outspoken drugs pushers responsible and hold them accountable for the outcome of their "marketing" in which anyone with ears and eyes can see it's merely a motivated money-grab by all involved.
A federal judge just denied Gavin Newsom’s request to block Trump from using the National Guard in LA.
Democrats don’t want immigration laws enforced; especially in California.
They use emotion to defend illegal immigration, but here’s what they don’t tell you:
Illegal immigrants inflate California’s census numbers, which boosts its House seats and electoral votes.
It’s not just “compassion”. It’s political power.
@DOGE@DOGE_USDA@DOGE_SSA ... an apparent lack of any legal action going to deter future offenders ? Want to set a precedent, show that they will indeed be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and at the same time, restore our trust in true due process.
@DOGE@DOGE_USDA@DOGE_SSA I fully agree with @WallStreetApes about prosecuting the criminals in congress. We've been told that lots of these criminal acts have been uncovered, and have also been given names and departments but no mention about punishing these fraudsters and thieves. Answer me this, how is
@RetroCoast Good for him. ... although, how sad is it that something like this is necessary? ... sadly, the mantra needs to shift to "trust no one". ... again, unfortunately sad.
We all do what we have to do, right?
@PeterM36670@Trumpster_007@atensnut Exactly. It appears that the banks are allowed to gouge their customers all day long and when it comes to evening out the playing field, the customer is the only one losing? How is that an equitable consumer/corporation exchange? No one says they need to forego fees altogether.
@Trumpster_007@atensnut Agreed. Yes, for the most part, deep government involvement in the private sector usually goes south and that is because of the long-standing status quo it's been operating under for many decades, mainly corruption and abuse; as DOGE is clearly discovering. Solution, disruption.
@bulldog1205@LeadingReport@Bulldog1205, I agree wholeheartedly. The key is that for those that are going to vote, and have those votes counted, they MUST be U.S. citizens, (period).
No exceptions, ever.
@RealJamesWoods I agree with Mr. Woods that the balls on this is ridiculous. Does she really believe she can just withold Federal Tax Dollars without any backlash? Does she really feel so self-empowered that she can blatantly post a financial threat to the Federal Government?. Bold or stupid?
@catturd2 Just another thought .... charities and foundations are created all the time; what would be the best examination process to properly determine whether it's a legit entity and not just another cash-grab by it's founders?.. perhaps a detailed audit showing it's complete operations?
@catturd2 Now, slopes reports that this is fase news, and it may very well be, ... which is why we all need to be extremely thorough and accurate with our own research and due diligence.
Skepticism of reported stories should always be at the forefront to determine their validity.
@catturd2 So, is this why most politicians propose certain pet projects that they "sell" to the public as a benefit to them, when all along the reason for the program is total and complete self-gain? and, if this is the case, why is that an allowable thing for a public servant?
What say u?