Smgod

[𝙍𝙞𝙥 𝘾𝙤𝙧𝙙 🇺🇲 @TheRipCord]

Don't forget Q said the NET WILL BE PAUSED at some point. If the net goes dark know they are in control...

[Julian Assange @ImJulianAssange]

The names of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Industry Minister Mélanie Joly are being invoked by the Trump administration following accusations that Canada is attempting to meddle in upcoming U.S. midterm elections.
Rather than a criminal or formal intelligence investigation, the allegations were detailed by the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa, which distributed an official "fact sheet" targeting prominent Canadian officials.

The Accusations Against Mélanie Joly

The U.S. Embassy’s document specifically singles out Industry Minister Mélanie Joly, quoting her five times.
• Targeting Republican States: The Trump administration pointed to public remarks Joly made regarding Canada's strategy in the ongoing trade war.
• Counter-Tariffs: The U.S. alleges that Joly's plans to level retaliatory counter-tariffs specifically aimed at economically damaging key Republican-heavy states constitute an implicit attempt to influence American voters and pressure U.S. businesses ahead of the midterms.

Other Canadian figures named in the U.S. document include Ontario Premier Doug Ford (for an anti-tariff ad campaign citing Ronald Reagan), Liberal MP Anthony Housefather, and Boston Consul General Bernadette Jordan.

[TOM NUMBERS: World No.1 in GEMATRIA (Simple) @RealTomNumbers]

Pres Trump says the Movie is coming to an END 👇🏼🎬🍿👍🏼🎺

[Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM @echipiuk]

What did this referendum teach us?

We still have a great deal of work to do if we want a society where people can question the status quo without being insulted, labelled or told to leave.

The level of hostility and vandalism, and the failure of those in positions of power to condemn that behaviour deserve serious scrutiny. Respectful disagreement requires leadership, especially when the people being targeted hold views you oppose.

You cannot call Canada a free, open and inclusive country, then treat people as though they do not belong because they question how it is governed.

Elections Alberta also has questions to answer about how this referendum has been, and continues to be, administered. Reports of mistake after mistake call for clear explanations and accountability. Responding defensively and attacking critics on social media does little to address those concerns. People should not have to chase basic information about their vote or the count. That information should be clear, accessible and timely.

And public trust? You do not restore it by lecturing people about how fortunate they are while dismissing the failures they live with every day. Those in positions of power also need to examine their own role in fuelling the vitriol. You cannot contribute to the hostility and then lecture everyone else about unity and respect.

Whatever your position on the referendum, the people you disagreed with are still your neighbours, colleagues, friends and family.

Moving forward requires more than asking citizens to accept the result. It requires those in power to address the concerns that brought people to question the status quo in the first place.

Accountability is not an attack. Disagreement is not disloyalty. And public trust takes more than a speech about unity.

[Smgod @AlexMurray78212]

@mybrotherskp @MarkJCarney Ah so THIS is what is going to force him out. Good @#%ing riddance!

[Smgod @AlexMurray78212]

@duzBme Buh-bye Billy boy!

[Fake Mark Carney @MarkCarney_Ego]

New drinking game:

Every time I say "dangerous and divided world", take one shot.

[Abbey | BLUE EYES @Blue_Eyes]

I'm with Peggy.
The writing on the wall could not be any clearer by now.
BUCKLE UP, buttercups - it's about to get bumpy!

[Smgod @AlexMurray78212]

@maryhollandnyc Bye bye Billy boy!

[Smgod @AlexMurray78212]

@MikkiWillis It all helps to wake people up. Time to rip off the band-aid.

[Mikki Willis Official @MikkiWillis]

They died alone. This film is their voice.

I refuse to forget the 1,167,210 Americans who died in isolated ICU beds, fighting for life while being poisoned by deadly protocols designated for hospitalized COVID patients.

That’s why we made Bad Medicine.

This is their postmortem. They deserve one.

The film follows a twisted trail of hard evidence. Step by step, it exposes the tricks and tactics used to capture and control entire populations.

Now it’s time for their story to be seen.

🎬 LA PREMIERE | Sunday, November 15
Malibu Film Festival, Writers Guild Theater, Beverly Hills
Live Q&A moderated by Jimmy Dore
Seating is limited.
👉 [link in the comments]

Can’t make it to LA? Bad Medicine may be coming to a theater near you.
🎟 ONE NIGHT ONLY | Wednesday, December 16
We’re bringing this film to theaters across the country for one night but we need YOUR help to do it!

Each screening only happens if enough tickets sell in advance. If a theater doesn’t hit its number, the screening is canceled.

12 potential theaters are already lined up, with more coming.

Don’t wait. Your ticket could be the one that brings this film to your city.

👉 Grab your seat now [link in the comments]

Don’t see your city? Request a screening on the same page.

Mainstream outlets won’t be promoting this film. It reaches theaters only if we fill them. Please get a ticket and share far and wide!

[NewsTreason Channel 17 @NewsTreason]

NOW THEY’RE SUDDENLY NOTICING? THE INSURRECTION ACT, MARTIAL LAW & THE MIDTERMS — WHY NOW?

Let me be clear: I personally do NOT see this happening before the elections….but…

Something interesting is happening in the national media narrative.

With the November 3 midterms approaching, we’re seeing repeated headlines discussing whether President Trump might invoke the Insurrection Act, declare a national emergency, or even impose martial law.

Look at the chronology over the last 30 days:

📅 SEPT 23 — THE ATLANTIC: Reports that Trump allies are urging extraordinary emergency measures surrounding the midterms, including martial law.

📅 SEPT 28 — TIME INTERVIEW: Trump is asked about declaring a national emergency before the elections. He responds: “I don’t rule anything out or in.”

Trump himself raises the Insurrection Act, saying he has never used it but could.

📅 OCT 1 — USA TODAY: Reports that Trump refuses to rule out invoking the Insurrection Act around the elections.

📅 OCT 1 — CNN: Devotes coverage to Trump’s remarks and the possibility of deploying military forces domestically.

📅 OCT 1 — PEOPLE: Reports on Trump’s comments concerning ICE at polling places and the Insurrection Act.

📅 OCT 1–5 — MEDIA SATURATION: A media tracker identifies coverage across 26 outlets discussing Trump’s emergency-powers comments.

📅 OCT 7 — JUST SECURITY: Publishes a legal analysis explaining why invoking the Insurrection Act would not override restrictions on troops at polling places.

📅 OCT 8 — BRENNAN CENTER: Republishes the legal analysis, subsequently updating it October 13.

📅 OCT 16 — AXIOS: Publishes an investigation titled “Trump’s MAGA allies openly discuss martial law,” examining proposals circulating among election activists.

📅 OCT 16 — BRENNAN CENTER: Publishes another analysis specifically addressing Trump’s emergency powers and their constitutional limitations.

AT LEAST 32 MEDIA COVERAGE INSTANCES IDENTIFIED — AND THAT IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE COUNT.

Now here’s my question:

WHY NOW?

Why is this particular discussion suddenly receiving so much attention just weeks before the midterms?

Is the media attempting to frighten voters about what Trump might do?

Is the subject being deliberately normalized so the public becomes familiar with the Insurrection Act and the limits of presidential emergency authority?

Or could the repeated coverage be preparing Americans for a legal and constitutional confrontation surrounding the elections?

Consider the broader convergence we’ve been tracking: DOJ election-integrity litigation, federal voter-roll investigations, cybersecurity preparations, and expanding federal scrutiny of election administration.

All of this is unfolding as the media repeatedly introduces the possibility of extraordinary presidential powers.

MY THEORY: Whether intentional or simply a consequence of escalating political tensions, this saturation of headlines may be conditioning the public to expect an extraordinary confrontation over election security and federal authority.

The timing of this discussion is worth examining.

The question isn’t simply whether Trump WILL invoke the Insurrection Act.

It’s why so many Americans are suddenly being asked to consider that possibility.

And why, of all times, is this conversation intensifying NOW — immediately before the midterms?

Coincidence? Political messaging? Or preparation for a constitutional showdown?

WATCH THE NARRATIVE.

[Del Bigtree @delbigtree]

CVS launches its new “Truth in Advertising” campaign ….

[Smgod @AlexMurray78212]

@DcLidstone I wonder if Chris or Chester are still alive. They may have been taken to safety. 2017 was quite the year!.

[Smgod @AlexMurray78212]

@ImJulianAssange Any idea what's going to be in Canada's EBS?

[Cathy O'Brien @RealCathyOBrien]

A quick listen or read, Ultra TDS does not mention Trump... because it is about media generated MK Ultra. Know facts
https://t.co/M1oj0l5Tpe

[Smgod @AlexMurray78212]

@NewsBlast17 Ooohh boy. The Biden family and Obama riiight around the corner!

[SGAnon @TheQNewsPatriot]

The mass_population is being prepared

[Dean Allison @DeanAllisonMP]

I mean … there’s not much I can say here folks, besides elections matter

[Smgod @AlexMurray78212]

@DeanAllisonMP Is it going to take a FF to wake up Canadians?