![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
Peter Ritz has been caught in what appears to be a web of serious lies and evasions, forcing the court to step in and schedule an emergency hearing. Genius Group, Roger and Eva's legal team rightfully demanded that Ritz be forced back into a deposition to explain himself after uncovering major fabrications in his story.
Judge Jennifer L. Rochon recognized the urgency of the situation and immediately ordered both sides to appear for a virtual conference on June 12, 2026, to address Ritzโs highly suspicious behavior before the fast-approaching discovery deadline.
The implications of these discoveries are devastating for Ritz and completely vindicate Genius Group, Roger, and Eva.
First, it exposed that Ritz flat-out lied about his employment details; he claimed under oath that he worked out of a New York WeWork office, but official records from WeWork prove the office was evicted months before he was even hired.
Second, Ritzโs supposed "whistleblower" claim completely falls apart under scrutiny, as he attributes his data to a mysterious, nameless woman on a Zoom call whom he claims he cannot remember.
Finally, it was discovered that Ritz hid an entire separate email account from the court, strongly suggesting he is actively concealing evidence that would clear their names.
Genius Group, Roger, and Eva heavily benefit from this development, as it completely exposes the lack of credibility and integrity behind the lawsuit against them.
By uncovering these massive contradictions and hidden emails, the defense has shifted the spotlight directly onto Ritz's dishonesty, giving the opposing side tremendous leverage to potentially get this meritless case thrown out entirely.
Meanwhile, Ritz's own lawyers had to embarrassingly admit to the judge that they cannot even get their own client to answer their calls or address these serious findings.
The next step is the June 12 federal court hearing, where Judge Rochon will demand answers regarding Ritzโs evasive behavior and hidden email account. Given the undeniable proof of misconduct the opposing side has put forward, the judge is highly expected to grant the motion and force Ritz into a supplemental deposition.
There, under intense legal pressure, Ritz will be held accountable and forced to answer for his WeWork claims, his imaginary mystery source, and his hidden communications.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKAsv2VaIAAbrdX.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
Peter Ritz has been caught in what appears to be a web of serious lies and evasions, forcing the court to step in and schedule an emergency hearing. Genius Group, Roger and Eva's legal team rightfully demanded that Ritz be forced back into a deposition to explain himself after uncovering major fabrications in his story.
Judge Jennifer L. Rochon recognized the urgency of the situation and immediately ordered both sides to appear for a virtual conference on June 12, 2026, to address Ritzโs highly suspicious behavior before the fast-approaching discovery deadline.
The implications of these discoveries are devastating for Ritz and completely vindicate Genius Group, Roger, and Eva.
First, it exposed that Ritz flat-out lied about his employment details; he claimed under oath that he worked out of a New York WeWork office, but official records from WeWork prove the office was evicted months before he was even hired.
Second, Ritzโs supposed "whistleblower" claim completely falls apart under scrutiny, as he attributes his data to a mysterious, nameless woman on a Zoom call whom he claims he cannot remember.
Finally, it was discovered that Ritz hid an entire separate email account from the court, strongly suggesting he is actively concealing evidence that would clear their names.
Genius Group, Roger, and Eva heavily benefit from this development, as it completely exposes the lack of credibility and integrity behind the lawsuit against them.
By uncovering these massive contradictions and hidden emails, the defense has shifted the spotlight directly onto Ritz's dishonesty, giving the opposing side tremendous leverage to potentially get this meritless case thrown out entirely.
Meanwhile, Ritz's own lawyers had to embarrassingly admit to the judge that they cannot even get their own client to answer their calls or address these serious findings.
The next step is the June 12 federal court hearing, where Judge Rochon will demand answers regarding Ritzโs evasive behavior and hidden email account. Given the undeniable proof of misconduct the opposing side has put forward, the judge is highly expected to grant the motion and force Ritz into a supplemental deposition.
There, under intense legal pressure, Ritz will be held accountable and forced to answer for his WeWork claims, his imaginary mystery source, and his hidden communications.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKAsv2TaMAAs9Iw.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
This filing is a formal letter to a judge from the lawyers representing Genius Group and its executives, Hamilton and Manziou. They are asking the judge to force the person suing them, Ritz (the Plaintiff), to sit down for a second official deposition under oath. The deadline to collect evidence is almost over, and the company says they just found proof that Ritz might not be telling the truth.
Specifically, official records from WeWork show he never actually worked at the New York office he claimed to use. The company also found out he had a secret second email address that was never checked for evidence, and they say he cannot remember the name of the mystery woman on Zoom who supposedly gave him his "whistleblower" information in the first place.
This is a massive blow to Ritzโs case. In a whistleblower lawsuit, everything depends on whether the judge and jury can trust the person speaking up. By showing that WeWork records completely contradict Ritzโs story, the company is basically calling him a liar.
If the judge believes Ritz made up details about where he worked or hid an email account, his credibility will be ruined. On top of that, admitting his entire lawsuit is based on a single Zoom call with a woman whose name he cannot even remember makes his whole case look incredibly weak and shaky.
Genius Group and its executives benefit the most if the judge approves their request. Genius Group and their lawyers get another chance to question Ritz, catch him in more lies, and grill him about the hidden email address and his mystery source. Even if the judge says no, the company still wins a little bit because they have successfully made the judge doubt Ritz's honesty before the actual trial even starts.
Next, Ritzโs lawyers will write their own letter to the judge to defend him, try to explain away the WeWork mix-up, and argue that a second interview is unfair. Because the final deadline for evidence is just days away, the judge will have to make a very quick decision. If the judge sides with the company, the case will be paused so Ritz can be forced to answer these tough questions under oath.
*****
Ritz's deception and tactics are coming back to bite him hard. This latest twist proves that no matter how deep you bury a lie, the truth will always find a way out.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ_7b5MbUAAakWf.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
This filing is a formal letter to a judge from the lawyers representing Genius Group and its executives, Hamilton and Manziou. They are asking the judge to force the person suing them, Ritz (the Plaintiff), to sit down for a second official deposition under oath. The deadline to collect evidence is almost over, and the company says they just found proof that Ritz might not be telling the truth.
Specifically, official records from WeWork show he never actually worked at the New York office he claimed to use. The company also found out he had a secret second email address that was never checked for evidence, and they say he cannot remember the name of the mystery woman on Zoom who supposedly gave him his "whistleblower" information in the first place.
This is a massive blow to Ritzโs case. In a whistleblower lawsuit, everything depends on whether the judge and jury can trust the person speaking up. By showing that WeWork records completely contradict Ritzโs story, the company is basically calling him a liar.
If the judge believes Ritz made up details about where he worked or hid an email account, his credibility will be ruined. On top of that, admitting his entire lawsuit is based on a single Zoom call with a woman whose name he cannot even remember makes his whole case look incredibly weak and shaky.
Genius Group and its executives benefit the most if the judge approves their request. Genius Group and their lawyers get another chance to question Ritz, catch him in more lies, and grill him about the hidden email address and his mystery source. Even if the judge says no, the company still wins a little bit because they have successfully made the judge doubt Ritz's honesty before the actual trial even starts.
Next, Ritzโs lawyers will write their own letter to the judge to defend him, try to explain away the WeWork mix-up, and argue that a second interview is unfair. Because the final deadline for evidence is just days away, the judge will have to make a very quick decision. If the judge sides with the company, the case will be paused so Ritz can be forced to answer these tough questions under oath.
*****
Ritz's deception and tactics are coming back to bite him hard. This latest twist proves that no matter how deep you bury a lie, the truth will always find a way out.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ_7b5MaIAAygIv.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc., Michael Moe, and Peter Ritz
+
VStock Transfer, LLC
This filing is addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in the Southern District of New York. The letter serves as a joint response from both sides of a lawsuit, Genius Group and LZGI, answering a direct order from the judge.
The court had asked them to explain whether a temporary pause (a "stay") on their current lawsuit should be removed, and whether that lawsuit should be combined (or "consolidated") with a separate, newer legal proceeding they are involved in.
The background of the dispute involves a prior ruling where the court paused the lawsuit while the two companies went through private arbitration to resolve their issues.
That arbitration concluded in April 2026, resulting in a "Final Award" that ordered LZGI to return over 7.3 million shares of Genius stock. Because Genius has since asked the court to officially confirm and enforce that arbitration win, while LZGI plans to fight it and ask the court to throw it out, there is a brand-new legal proceeding specifically handling that dispute.
In conclusion, both companies are asking the judge to keep the main lawsuit paused for now and not to combine the two cases yet. They argue that whatever the court decides regarding the arbitration award will heavily impact the stock shares at the heart of the main lawsuit. Therefore, they believe it makes the most sense to resolve the arbitration dispute first before restarting or merging the original case.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ-hCLwboAA2Sqs.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc., Michael Moe, and Peter Ritz
+
VStock Transfer, LLC
This filing is addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in the Southern District of New York. The letter serves as a joint response from both sides of a lawsuit, Genius Group and LZGI, answering a direct order from the judge.
The court had asked them to explain whether a temporary pause (a "stay") on their current lawsuit should be removed, and whether that lawsuit should be combined (or "consolidated") with a separate, newer legal proceeding they are involved in.
The background of the dispute involves a prior ruling where the court paused the lawsuit while the two companies went through private arbitration to resolve their issues.
That arbitration concluded in April 2026, resulting in a "Final Award" that ordered LZGI to return over 7.3 million shares of Genius stock. Because Genius has since asked the court to officially confirm and enforce that arbitration win, while LZGI plans to fight it and ask the court to throw it out, there is a brand-new legal proceeding specifically handling that dispute.
In conclusion, both companies are asking the judge to keep the main lawsuit paused for now and not to combine the two cases yet. They argue that whatever the court decides regarding the arbitration award will heavily impact the stock shares at the heart of the main lawsuit. Therefore, they believe it makes the most sense to resolve the arbitration dispute first before restarting or merging the original case.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ-hCLubgAAUY1N.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc., Michael Moe, and Peter Ritz
+
VStock Transfer, LLC
This filing is addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in the Southern District of New York. The letter serves as a joint response from both sides of a lawsuit, Genius Group and LZGI, answering a direct order from the judge.
The court had asked them to explain whether a temporary pause (a "stay") on their current lawsuit should be removed, and whether that lawsuit should be combined (or "consolidated") with a separate, newer legal proceeding they are involved in.
The background of the dispute involves a prior ruling where the court paused the lawsuit while the two companies went through private arbitration to resolve their issues.
That arbitration concluded in April 2026, resulting in a "Final Award" that ordered LZGI to return over 7.3 million shares of Genius stock. Because Genius has since asked the court to officially confirm and enforce that arbitration win, while LZGI plans to fight it and ask the court to throw it out, there is a brand-new legal proceeding specifically handling that dispute.
In conclusion, both companies are asking the judge to keep the main lawsuit paused for now and not to combine the two cases yet. They argue that whatever the court decides regarding the arbitration award will heavily impact the stock shares at the heart of the main lawsuit. Therefore, they believe it makes the most sense to resolve the arbitration dispute first before restarting or merging the original case.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ-hCLuacAA9BUl.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [SETTLEMENT SUMMARY]
Shawn Carey et al v Michael Moe et al
(aka: LZGI shareholders v LZGI, Michael Moe and Peter Ritz)
This formal Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement completely resolves a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit. The legal action was originally brought by plaintiff shareholders, led by Shawn Carey, on behalf of LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) against individual corporate insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.
To eliminate the extensive expenses, risks, and burdens associated with ongoing litigation, all involved parties have agreed to a global release of claims. Under the terms of this agreement, the defendants do not admit any liability or corporate wrongdoing.
The core financial and structural terms of the settlement require substantial concessions from the defendants. Moe and Ritz have agreed to pay a total of $2,500,000 into an escrow account. From this fund, $1,900,000 is allocated to pay the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses (AXS Law Group), while the remaining $600,000 will be paid directly into the corporate treasury of LZGI.
Additionally, the defendants must permanently surrender 50% of all LZGI stock they beneficially own back to the company for cancellation, which reduces their ownership control and prevents further dilution for remaining shareholders. In exchange, the plaintiffs agree to lift and vacate a prior default that had been entered against the defendants by the court.
Because LZGI currently has no active business operations and no revenue, the settlement mandates sweeping corporate governance reforms, severe financial transparency, and an accounting of the company's debts. The company's board must file a complete Statement of Liabilities and issue a formal Shareholder Update through the SEC. This update will evaluate strategic future options for the entity, including potential dissolution, bankruptcy, or winding down. Should the company survive and continue operations, they are required to implement stricter governance measures, such as recruiting independent directors and establishing formal ethics committees.
The extensive financial toll of this legal battle is highlighted by the massive liabilities accumulated by both sides during the dispute. While the plaintiffs racked up roughly $1.9 million in legal fees and expenses to be covered by the escrow fund, the defendants incurred over $3.36 million in separate liabilities just defending themselves up to this point. Furthermore, a detailed shareholder list from the transfer agent is appended to the agreement, mapping out the distribution of restricted and unrestricted shares as the company addresses its outstanding obligations.
Once the presiding judge, the Honorable Lisa M. Walsh, grants final approval, the settlement will provide a global release of all claims. Both sides will be permanently barred from suing each other over these past issues, and the lawsuit will be dismissed "with prejudice," meaning it is permanently closed and cannot be refiled. Current LZGI stockholders will be notified of the agreement via an approved template notice, granting them the legal right to submit written objections to the court if they believe the settlement terms or the handling of corporate liabilities are inadequate.
*****
High-Level Summary
LZGI Settlement and Agreement
- Context: Formal agreement filed on June 2, 2026, in a Florida state court, completely resolving a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit led by plaintiff Shawn Carey against insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz.
- Liability: Settled to eliminate further litigation costs; defendants admit no liability or wrongdoing.
1. Financial & Equity Terms
- $2,500,000 Cash Settlement: Paid by defendants into an escrow account.
- $1,900,000 allocated to plaintiffs' legal fees (AXS Law Group).
- $600,000 paid directly into the LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) corporate treasury.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ_B2VzbEAAaB_Y.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [SETTLEMENT SUMMARY]
Shawn Carey et al v Michael Moe et al
(aka: LZGI shareholders v LZGI, Michael Moe and Peter Ritz)
This formal Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement completely resolves a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit. The legal action was originally brought by plaintiff shareholders, led by Shawn Carey, on behalf of LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) against individual corporate insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.
To eliminate the extensive expenses, risks, and burdens associated with ongoing litigation, all involved parties have agreed to a global release of claims. Under the terms of this agreement, the defendants do not admit any liability or corporate wrongdoing.
The core financial and structural terms of the settlement require substantial concessions from the defendants. Moe and Ritz have agreed to pay a total of $2,500,000 into an escrow account. From this fund, $1,900,000 is allocated to pay the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses (AXS Law Group), while the remaining $600,000 will be paid directly into the corporate treasury of LZGI.
Additionally, the defendants must permanently surrender 50% of all LZGI stock they beneficially own back to the company for cancellation, which reduces their ownership control and prevents further dilution for remaining shareholders. In exchange, the plaintiffs agree to lift and vacate a prior default that had been entered against the defendants by the court.
Because LZGI currently has no active business operations and no revenue, the settlement mandates sweeping corporate governance reforms, severe financial transparency, and an accounting of the company's debts. The company's board must file a complete Statement of Liabilities and issue a formal Shareholder Update through the SEC. This update will evaluate strategic future options for the entity, including potential dissolution, bankruptcy, or winding down. Should the company survive and continue operations, they are required to implement stricter governance measures, such as recruiting independent directors and establishing formal ethics committees.
The extensive financial toll of this legal battle is highlighted by the massive liabilities accumulated by both sides during the dispute. While the plaintiffs racked up roughly $1.9 million in legal fees and expenses to be covered by the escrow fund, the defendants incurred over $3.36 million in separate liabilities just defending themselves up to this point. Furthermore, a detailed shareholder list from the transfer agent is appended to the agreement, mapping out the distribution of restricted and unrestricted shares as the company addresses its outstanding obligations.
Once the presiding judge, the Honorable Lisa M. Walsh, grants final approval, the settlement will provide a global release of all claims. Both sides will be permanently barred from suing each other over these past issues, and the lawsuit will be dismissed "with prejudice," meaning it is permanently closed and cannot be refiled. Current LZGI stockholders will be notified of the agreement via an approved template notice, granting them the legal right to submit written objections to the court if they believe the settlement terms or the handling of corporate liabilities are inadequate.
*****
High-Level Summary
LZGI Settlement and Agreement
- Context: Formal agreement filed on June 2, 2026, in a Florida state court, completely resolving a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit led by plaintiff Shawn Carey against insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz.
- Liability: Settled to eliminate further litigation costs; defendants admit no liability or wrongdoing.
1. Financial & Equity Terms
- $2,500,000 Cash Settlement: Paid by defendants into an escrow account.
- $1,900,000 allocated to plaintiffs' legal fees (AXS Law Group).
- $600,000 paid directly into the LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) corporate treasury.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ_B2VxaoAA8utS.jpg)
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [SETTLEMENT SUMMARY]
Shawn Carey et al v Michael Moe et al
(aka: LZGI shareholders v LZGI, Michael Moe and Peter Ritz)
This formal Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement completely resolves a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit. The legal action was originally brought by plaintiff shareholders, led by Shawn Carey, on behalf of LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) against individual corporate insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.
To eliminate the extensive expenses, risks, and burdens associated with ongoing litigation, all involved parties have agreed to a global release of claims. Under the terms of this agreement, the defendants do not admit any liability or corporate wrongdoing.
The core financial and structural terms of the settlement require substantial concessions from the defendants. Moe and Ritz have agreed to pay a total of $2,500,000 into an escrow account. From this fund, $1,900,000 is allocated to pay the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses (AXS Law Group), while the remaining $600,000 will be paid directly into the corporate treasury of LZGI.
Additionally, the defendants must permanently surrender 50% of all LZGI stock they beneficially own back to the company for cancellation, which reduces their ownership control and prevents further dilution for remaining shareholders. In exchange, the plaintiffs agree to lift and vacate a prior default that had been entered against the defendants by the court.
Because LZGI currently has no active business operations and no revenue, the settlement mandates sweeping corporate governance reforms, severe financial transparency, and an accounting of the company's debts. The company's board must file a complete Statement of Liabilities and issue a formal Shareholder Update through the SEC. This update will evaluate strategic future options for the entity, including potential dissolution, bankruptcy, or winding down. Should the company survive and continue operations, they are required to implement stricter governance measures, such as recruiting independent directors and establishing formal ethics committees.
The extensive financial toll of this legal battle is highlighted by the massive liabilities accumulated by both sides during the dispute. While the plaintiffs racked up roughly $1.9 million in legal fees and expenses to be covered by the escrow fund, the defendants incurred over $3.36 million in separate liabilities just defending themselves up to this point. Furthermore, a detailed shareholder list from the transfer agent is appended to the agreement, mapping out the distribution of restricted and unrestricted shares as the company addresses its outstanding obligations.
Once the presiding judge, the Honorable Lisa M. Walsh, grants final approval, the settlement will provide a global release of all claims. Both sides will be permanently barred from suing each other over these past issues, and the lawsuit will be dismissed "with prejudice," meaning it is permanently closed and cannot be refiled. Current LZGI stockholders will be notified of the agreement via an approved template notice, granting them the legal right to submit written objections to the court if they believe the settlement terms or the handling of corporate liabilities are inadequate.
*****
High-Level Summary
LZGI Settlement and Agreement
- Context: Formal agreement filed on June 2, 2026, in a Florida state court, completely resolving a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit led by plaintiff Shawn Carey against insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz.
- Liability: Settled to eliminate further litigation costs; defendants admit no liability or wrongdoing.
1. Financial & Equity Terms
- $2,500,000 Cash Settlement: Paid by defendants into an escrow account.
- $1,900,000 allocated to plaintiffs' legal fees (AXS Law Group).
- $600,000 paid directly into the LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) corporate treasury.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ_B2VoawAAIH8Y.jpg)
Olivia
Online
@havepaytiencee We have various funding pathways we disclose in our whitepaper. Our focus is to take the paths that maximise NAV per share. Our NAV / share has increased in 24 mths from $0.27 / share to $0.60 / share (YE 2023-YE2025).
Biggest scam ever
$GNS AI Treasury includes fund investment in $SPCX 2022 round at $125bn. $1.75tn IPO = 14x
Our exponential future is here.
Please take time to read this post as it perfectly captures the complex, plumbing of the markets. It is a top tier institutional note. What makes it so good is that it completely ignores the superficial media chatter targeting Elon Musk personally and rocket technology. Instead, it focuses on the reality of Inelastic Liquidity Flows and Gamma Regimes. Have a great trading day.
Who to follow
Lazy_1One 
@Lazy_1One
Family, food, movies, photography! The outdoors!
#AMC since 1/21/2021 Go see some Movies at the Theatre
AMC Kidd ๐๐ฟ๐ฆ
@JAK__KIDD
I quote movies daily
AMC A-Listed
1/28/21 never forget the Buy Button was removed
#AMC ๐ฆ#Ape
โSave the movies, Save the worldโ~A.S.
Jackson Lambโs Coat
@ape_steinUK
AMC/GME/HYMC WWFC TRAVEL
Capital markets are funding the AI buildout at historic scale: ~$400B over 6 months. Bitcoin ETFs have seen ~$4B of outflows since May 14, pressuring $BTC. This is a capital rotation, not a Bitcoin impairment. Volatility creates opportunity.
๐จ It's not just ZCash.
Opus 4.8 also found a vulnerability in $USD that allows for unlimited issuance which could theoretically enrich insiders at the expense of all holders
huge breaking
@charlestonwhyt This nigga funna die
Investors when they realize Quantum Compute is next up after AI
Bitcoin $BTC has fallen to its 200-week moving average for the first time since 2023 ๐ Historically, this has been a great buying opportunity ๐
@Caddy519 @rogerhamilton Yea it was pointless really. If you havenโt done your dd then I guess it was for them
JUST IN: Zcash crashes 48% after Claude AI finds critical vulnerability allowing unlimited minting of $ZEC.
It went unnoticed for 4 years until it was patched on June 1st.
$GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
Peter Ritz has been caught in what appears to be a web of serious lies and evasions, forcing the court to step in and schedule an emergency hearing. Genius Group, Roger and Eva's legal team rightfully demanded that Ritz be forced back into a deposition to explain himself after uncovering major fabrications in his story.
Judge Jennifer L. Rochon recognized the urgency of the situation and immediately ordered both sides to appear for a virtual conference on June 12, 2026, to address Ritzโs highly suspicious behavior before the fast-approaching discovery deadline.
The implications of these discoveries are devastating for Ritz and completely vindicate Genius Group, Roger, and Eva.
First, it exposed that Ritz flat-out lied about his employment details; he claimed under oath that he worked out of a New York WeWork office, but official records from WeWork prove the office was evicted months before he was even hired.
Second, Ritzโs supposed "whistleblower" claim completely falls apart under scrutiny, as he attributes his data to a mysterious, nameless woman on a Zoom call whom he claims he cannot remember.
Finally, it was discovered that Ritz hid an entire separate email account from the court, strongly suggesting he is actively concealing evidence that would clear their names.
Genius Group, Roger, and Eva heavily benefit from this development, as it completely exposes the lack of credibility and integrity behind the lawsuit against them.
By uncovering these massive contradictions and hidden emails, the defense has shifted the spotlight directly onto Ritz's dishonesty, giving the opposing side tremendous leverage to potentially get this meritless case thrown out entirely.
Meanwhile, Ritz's own lawyers had to embarrassingly admit to the judge that they cannot even get their own client to answer their calls or address these serious findings.
The next step is the June 12 federal court hearing, where Judge Rochon will demand answers regarding Ritzโs evasive behavior and hidden email account. Given the undeniable proof of misconduct the opposing side has put forward, the judge is highly expected to grant the motion and force Ritz into a supplemental deposition.
There, under intense legal pressure, Ritz will be held accountable and forced to answer for his WeWork claims, his imaginary mystery source, and his hidden communications.
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
Peter Ritz has been caught in what appears to be a web of serious lies and evasions, forcing the court to step in and schedule an emergency hearing. Genius Group, Roger and Eva's legal team rightfully demanded that Ritz be forced back into a deposition to explain himself after uncovering major fabrications in his story.
Judge Jennifer L. Rochon recognized the urgency of the situation and immediately ordered both sides to appear for a virtual conference on June 12, 2026, to address Ritzโs highly suspicious behavior before the fast-approaching discovery deadline.
The implications of these discoveries are devastating for Ritz and completely vindicate Genius Group, Roger, and Eva.
First, it exposed that Ritz flat-out lied about his employment details; he claimed under oath that he worked out of a New York WeWork office, but official records from WeWork prove the office was evicted months before he was even hired.
Second, Ritzโs supposed "whistleblower" claim completely falls apart under scrutiny, as he attributes his data to a mysterious, nameless woman on a Zoom call whom he claims he cannot remember.
Finally, it was discovered that Ritz hid an entire separate email account from the court, strongly suggesting he is actively concealing evidence that would clear their names.
Genius Group, Roger, and Eva heavily benefit from this development, as it completely exposes the lack of credibility and integrity behind the lawsuit against them.
By uncovering these massive contradictions and hidden emails, the defense has shifted the spotlight directly onto Ritz's dishonesty, giving the opposing side tremendous leverage to potentially get this meritless case thrown out entirely.
Meanwhile, Ritz's own lawyers had to embarrassingly admit to the judge that they cannot even get their own client to answer their calls or address these serious findings.
The next step is the June 12 federal court hearing, where Judge Rochon will demand answers regarding Ritzโs evasive behavior and hidden email account. Given the undeniable proof of misconduct the opposing side has put forward, the judge is highly expected to grant the motion and force Ritz into a supplemental deposition.
There, under intense legal pressure, Ritz will be held accountable and forced to answer for his WeWork claims, his imaginary mystery source, and his hidden communications.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKAsv2Wb0AA0Plo.jpg)
TRUMP VALUES FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC AT ROUGHLY $1 TRILLION.
$GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
This filing is a formal letter to a judge from the lawyers representing Genius Group and its executives, Hamilton and Manziou. They are asking the judge to force the person suing them, Ritz (the Plaintiff), to sit down for a second official deposition under oath. The deadline to collect evidence is almost over, and the company says they just found proof that Ritz might not be telling the truth.
Specifically, official records from WeWork show he never actually worked at the New York office he claimed to use. The company also found out he had a secret second email address that was never checked for evidence, and they say he cannot remember the name of the mystery woman on Zoom who supposedly gave him his "whistleblower" information in the first place.
This is a massive blow to Ritzโs case. In a whistleblower lawsuit, everything depends on whether the judge and jury can trust the person speaking up. By showing that WeWork records completely contradict Ritzโs story, the company is basically calling him a liar.
If the judge believes Ritz made up details about where he worked or hid an email account, his credibility will be ruined. On top of that, admitting his entire lawsuit is based on a single Zoom call with a woman whose name he cannot even remember makes his whole case look incredibly weak and shaky.
Genius Group and its executives benefit the most if the judge approves their request. Genius Group and their lawyers get another chance to question Ritz, catch him in more lies, and grill him about the hidden email address and his mystery source. Even if the judge says no, the company still wins a little bit because they have successfully made the judge doubt Ritz's honesty before the actual trial even starts.
Next, Ritzโs lawyers will write their own letter to the judge to defend him, try to explain away the WeWork mix-up, and argue that a second interview is unfair. Because the final deadline for evidence is just days away, the judge will have to make a very quick decision. If the judge sides with the company, the case will be paused so Ritz can be forced to answer these tough questions under oath.
*****
Ritz's deception and tactics are coming back to bite him hard. This latest twist proves that no matter how deep you bury a lie, the truth will always find a way out.
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Ritz v Genius Group Limited, Roger Hamilton and Eva Mantziou
&
Genius Group Limited v Ritz (+ Moe) - Countersuit
This filing is a formal letter to a judge from the lawyers representing Genius Group and its executives, Hamilton and Manziou. They are asking the judge to force the person suing them, Ritz (the Plaintiff), to sit down for a second official deposition under oath. The deadline to collect evidence is almost over, and the company says they just found proof that Ritz might not be telling the truth.
Specifically, official records from WeWork show he never actually worked at the New York office he claimed to use. The company also found out he had a secret second email address that was never checked for evidence, and they say he cannot remember the name of the mystery woman on Zoom who supposedly gave him his "whistleblower" information in the first place.
This is a massive blow to Ritzโs case. In a whistleblower lawsuit, everything depends on whether the judge and jury can trust the person speaking up. By showing that WeWork records completely contradict Ritzโs story, the company is basically calling him a liar.
If the judge believes Ritz made up details about where he worked or hid an email account, his credibility will be ruined. On top of that, admitting his entire lawsuit is based on a single Zoom call with a woman whose name he cannot even remember makes his whole case look incredibly weak and shaky.
Genius Group and its executives benefit the most if the judge approves their request. Genius Group and their lawyers get another chance to question Ritz, catch him in more lies, and grill him about the hidden email address and his mystery source. Even if the judge says no, the company still wins a little bit because they have successfully made the judge doubt Ritz's honesty before the actual trial even starts.
Next, Ritzโs lawyers will write their own letter to the judge to defend him, try to explain away the WeWork mix-up, and argue that a second interview is unfair. Because the final deadline for evidence is just days away, the judge will have to make a very quick decision. If the judge sides with the company, the case will be paused so Ritz can be forced to answer these tough questions under oath.
*****
Ritz's deception and tactics are coming back to bite him hard. This latest twist proves that no matter how deep you bury a lie, the truth will always find a way out.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ_7b5OacAEgV3f.jpg)
$GNS [ANALYSIS]
LZGI and Executives Michael Moe and Peter Ritz Exposed: Court Documents Reveal Empty Operations, Millions in Penalties
Now that this once-secret settlement is a matter of public record, it completely changes the game for everyone involved, especially Genius Group Limited (GNS).
By being filed in an open Florida court, the agreement strips away all privacy and exposes exactly how broken LZG International (LZGI) really is. The public, investors, and competitors can now see the messy details of the corporate war, the heavy fines handed down, and the total collapse of the company's leadership.
For LZGI and its top bosses, Michael Moe and Peter Ritz, this public disclosure is a total disaster. The document proves to the world that LZGI is an empty shell with no actual business operations and zero revenue.
It also reveals exactly how much the two executives are being punished: they have to pay $2.5 million in cash and give up half (50%) of all their company stock to be destroyed. Because the agreement forces the company to publicly report all its debts and consider filing for bankruptcy or shutting down entirely, it signals to the stock market that LZGI is effectively finished.
For Genius Group (GNS), which ICC report claims it was fraudulently induced into this mess through a failed business deal, this public document is a massive victory. Since LZGIโs own shareholders are the ones forcing Moe and Ritz to pay up for bad behavior, it proves to the public that the two executives were the real problem. This completely clears Genius Groupโs name, confirming they were victims of a bad deal rather than partners in wrongdoing.
Finally, making this document public gives Genius Group a perfect roadmap to get its money back. The settlement openly states that $600,000 of the penalty cash is going straight into LZGI's corporate bank account.
Armed with this public knowledge, Genius Group can now rush to court to freeze and seize that money to pay off what LZGI owes them before the company goes completely bankrupt. In short, the secret coming out permanently defeats LZGI's old bosses and gives Genius Group a clear path to move against them.
*****
Long story short: LGZI and their executives cooked their books and knowingly committed fraud.
GAME OVER!
$GNS [UPDATE]
Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc., Michael Moe, and Peter Ritz
+
VStock Transfer, LLC
This filing is addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in the Southern District of New York. The letter serves as a joint response from both sides of a lawsuit, Genius Group and LZGI, answering a direct order from the judge.
The court had asked them to explain whether a temporary pause (a "stay") on their current lawsuit should be removed, and whether that lawsuit should be combined (or "consolidated") with a separate, newer legal proceeding they are involved in.
The background of the dispute involves a prior ruling where the court paused the lawsuit while the two companies went through private arbitration to resolve their issues.
That arbitration concluded in April 2026, resulting in a "Final Award" that ordered LZGI to return over 7.3 million shares of Genius stock. Because Genius has since asked the court to officially confirm and enforce that arbitration win, while LZGI plans to fight it and ask the court to throw it out, there is a brand-new legal proceeding specifically handling that dispute.
In conclusion, both companies are asking the judge to keep the main lawsuit paused for now and not to combine the two cases yet. They argue that whatever the court decides regarding the arbitration award will heavily impact the stock shares at the heart of the main lawsuit. Therefore, they believe it makes the most sense to resolve the arbitration dispute first before restarting or merging the original case.
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [UPDATE]
Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc., Michael Moe, and Peter Ritz
+
VStock Transfer, LLC
This filing is addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in the Southern District of New York. The letter serves as a joint response from both sides of a lawsuit, Genius Group and LZGI, answering a direct order from the judge.
The court had asked them to explain whether a temporary pause (a "stay") on their current lawsuit should be removed, and whether that lawsuit should be combined (or "consolidated") with a separate, newer legal proceeding they are involved in.
The background of the dispute involves a prior ruling where the court paused the lawsuit while the two companies went through private arbitration to resolve their issues.
That arbitration concluded in April 2026, resulting in a "Final Award" that ordered LZGI to return over 7.3 million shares of Genius stock. Because Genius has since asked the court to officially confirm and enforce that arbitration win, while LZGI plans to fight it and ask the court to throw it out, there is a brand-new legal proceeding specifically handling that dispute.
In conclusion, both companies are asking the judge to keep the main lawsuit paused for now and not to combine the two cases yet. They argue that whatever the court decides regarding the arbitration award will heavily impact the stock shares at the heart of the main lawsuit. Therefore, they believe it makes the most sense to resolve the arbitration dispute first before restarting or merging the original case.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ-hCL1asAElKh5.jpg)
$GNS [SETTLEMENT SUMMARY]
Shawn Carey et al v Michael Moe et al
(aka: LZGI shareholders v LZGI, Michael Moe and Peter Ritz)
This formal Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement completely resolves a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit. The legal action was originally brought by plaintiff shareholders, led by Shawn Carey, on behalf of LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) against individual corporate insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.
To eliminate the extensive expenses, risks, and burdens associated with ongoing litigation, all involved parties have agreed to a global release of claims. Under the terms of this agreement, the defendants do not admit any liability or corporate wrongdoing.
The core financial and structural terms of the settlement require substantial concessions from the defendants. Moe and Ritz have agreed to pay a total of $2,500,000 into an escrow account. From this fund, $1,900,000 is allocated to pay the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses (AXS Law Group), while the remaining $600,000 will be paid directly into the corporate treasury of LZGI.
Additionally, the defendants must permanently surrender 50% of all LZGI stock they beneficially own back to the company for cancellation, which reduces their ownership control and prevents further dilution for remaining shareholders. In exchange, the plaintiffs agree to lift and vacate a prior default that had been entered against the defendants by the court.
Because LZGI currently has no active business operations and no revenue, the settlement mandates sweeping corporate governance reforms, severe financial transparency, and an accounting of the company's debts. The company's board must file a complete Statement of Liabilities and issue a formal Shareholder Update through the SEC. This update will evaluate strategic future options for the entity, including potential dissolution, bankruptcy, or winding down. Should the company survive and continue operations, they are required to implement stricter governance measures, such as recruiting independent directors and establishing formal ethics committees.
The extensive financial toll of this legal battle is highlighted by the massive liabilities accumulated by both sides during the dispute. While the plaintiffs racked up roughly $1.9 million in legal fees and expenses to be covered by the escrow fund, the defendants incurred over $3.36 million in separate liabilities just defending themselves up to this point. Furthermore, a detailed shareholder list from the transfer agent is appended to the agreement, mapping out the distribution of restricted and unrestricted shares as the company addresses its outstanding obligations.
Once the presiding judge, the Honorable Lisa M. Walsh, grants final approval, the settlement will provide a global release of all claims. Both sides will be permanently barred from suing each other over these past issues, and the lawsuit will be dismissed "with prejudice," meaning it is permanently closed and cannot be refiled. Current LZGI stockholders will be notified of the agreement via an approved template notice, granting them the legal right to submit written objections to the court if they believe the settlement terms or the handling of corporate liabilities are inadequate.
*****
High-Level Summary
LZGI Settlement and Agreement
- Context: Formal agreement filed on June 2, 2026, in a Florida state court, completely resolving a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit led by plaintiff Shawn Carey against insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz.
- Liability: Settled to eliminate further litigation costs; defendants admit no liability or wrongdoing.
1. Financial & Equity Terms
- $2,500,000 Cash Settlement: Paid by defendants into an escrow account.
- $1,900,000 allocated to plaintiffs' legal fees (AXS Law Group).
- $600,000 paid directly into the LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) corporate treasury.
![Ohitskaykay_St's tweet photo. $GNS [SETTLEMENT SUMMARY]
Shawn Carey et al v Michael Moe et al
(aka: LZGI shareholders v LZGI, Michael Moe and Peter Ritz)
This formal Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement completely resolves a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit. The legal action was originally brought by plaintiff shareholders, led by Shawn Carey, on behalf of LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) against individual corporate insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.
To eliminate the extensive expenses, risks, and burdens associated with ongoing litigation, all involved parties have agreed to a global release of claims. Under the terms of this agreement, the defendants do not admit any liability or corporate wrongdoing.
The core financial and structural terms of the settlement require substantial concessions from the defendants. Moe and Ritz have agreed to pay a total of $2,500,000 into an escrow account. From this fund, $1,900,000 is allocated to pay the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses (AXS Law Group), while the remaining $600,000 will be paid directly into the corporate treasury of LZGI.
Additionally, the defendants must permanently surrender 50% of all LZGI stock they beneficially own back to the company for cancellation, which reduces their ownership control and prevents further dilution for remaining shareholders. In exchange, the plaintiffs agree to lift and vacate a prior default that had been entered against the defendants by the court.
Because LZGI currently has no active business operations and no revenue, the settlement mandates sweeping corporate governance reforms, severe financial transparency, and an accounting of the company's debts. The company's board must file a complete Statement of Liabilities and issue a formal Shareholder Update through the SEC. This update will evaluate strategic future options for the entity, including potential dissolution, bankruptcy, or winding down. Should the company survive and continue operations, they are required to implement stricter governance measures, such as recruiting independent directors and establishing formal ethics committees.
The extensive financial toll of this legal battle is highlighted by the massive liabilities accumulated by both sides during the dispute. While the plaintiffs racked up roughly $1.9 million in legal fees and expenses to be covered by the escrow fund, the defendants incurred over $3.36 million in separate liabilities just defending themselves up to this point. Furthermore, a detailed shareholder list from the transfer agent is appended to the agreement, mapping out the distribution of restricted and unrestricted shares as the company addresses its outstanding obligations.
Once the presiding judge, the Honorable Lisa M. Walsh, grants final approval, the settlement will provide a global release of all claims. Both sides will be permanently barred from suing each other over these past issues, and the lawsuit will be dismissed "with prejudice," meaning it is permanently closed and cannot be refiled. Current LZGI stockholders will be notified of the agreement via an approved template notice, granting them the legal right to submit written objections to the court if they believe the settlement terms or the handling of corporate liabilities are inadequate.
*****
High-Level Summary
LZGI Settlement and Agreement
- Context: Formal agreement filed on June 2, 2026, in a Florida state court, completely resolving a consolidated shareholder derivative lawsuit led by plaintiff Shawn Carey against insiders Michael Moe and Peter Ritz.
- Liability: Settled to eliminate further litigation costs; defendants admit no liability or wrongdoing.
1. Financial & Equity Terms
- $2,500,000 Cash Settlement: Paid by defendants into an escrow account.
- $1,900,000 allocated to plaintiffs' legal fees (AXS Law Group).
- $600,000 paid directly into the LZG International, Inc. (LZGI) corporate treasury.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJ_B2V5bQAAp5_n.jpg)
$GNS [BREAKING NEWS]
They wanted total silence. Instead, they got a total circus.
Michael Moe, Peter Ritz, and their lawyers fought to keep their settlement confidential and under seal. Then, in a stunning blunder, the agreement was officially filed and made public for the world to see.
JUSTICE PREVAILS! Details are coming soon.
@WhiteHouse Congratulations, Bill!
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
amine
Seen from Algeria
La Rosen Escort
Seen from Mexico
ููููฑุฑุณููู .....โ๏ธ๐
Seen from Egypt
Hydro
jast kirieshka (orders are open)
Seen from Brazil
Tilki HUBVฤฐP
Seen from Turkey
yangviral
Seen from Indonesia
Johnny Bravo
Seen from United Kingdom
Senux
Seen from United States
Ensest CD Pasif
Seen from Turkey
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
108.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.8M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.6M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
CNN Breaking News
@cnnbrk
59.9M followers