@amerix Any evidence, or you are just perpetuating propaganda for the state? Then if all the people who are daring to bring the change are bad, suggest your most preferred 'messiah' for 2027, we interrogate his capabilities.
@orengo_james Congratulations @orengo_james ,this is what a serious presidential contender does! Fishing great allies for a bigger agenda, not with money like others, but by sharing the burning vision he has for the nation.
Every lawyer has a 2am.
Not the kind where you're working late. The kind where you're lying in the dark replaying one thing you already did and cannot undo.
Maybe it's a deadline you calculated. Maybe it's a clause you drafted. Maybe it's the answer you gave a client on a Tuesday that they acted on by Friday.
It looked fine when you did it. It looked fine for weeks. And then tonight - one sentence in an opinion, one email, one offhand comment from another lawyer at an event and the doubt arrives, and your stomach drops before the thought even finishes.
You get up. You pull the file. You read your own work again. You read it a fourth time, the words swimming, and you genuinely cannot tell anymore whether you are being paranoid or whether you are staring at the end of the thing you spent ten years building.
And here is what makes it so much worse than it should be:
There is no one to ask.
At a firm, you walk down the hall. You put your head into someone's office and say "tell me I'm crazy," and they either tell you you're crazy or they help you fix it. Either way, you are not alone with it.
You are the firm. So you carry it to your car. To dinner. To bed. Running the same loop in the dark, because the only thing worse than knowing is not knowing.
And underneath all of it sits the worst part.
If you got this wrong, you don't just have to live with it. The rules say you have to pick up the phone and tell the client yourself.
You have to be the one to say the words.
If this has ever been you - read it twice.
You are not careless. You are not weak. You are not bad at this.
You are doing alone a job that was built for ten people to do together.
At a real firm, the thing you did tonight would have passed through ten hands before it ever reached a client. The associate who drafts. The senior who reviews. The partner who asks the one question you didn't think to ask. The clerk who catches the date. Every pair of hands a chance to catch what you cannot catch alone at 2am.
The day you went solo, you didn't lose the staff.
You became all ten hands.
The 2am fear isn't a flaw in you.
It's the sound of one person holding up a system that was built for ten.
@jimNjue_ You are farming for X engagements just because of Elon's dollar at the expense of the opposition leadership. Why attack a deceased Baba, and his support base all in the name of Riggy G? Hii ni ufala!
Once again our Constitution just showed that it is not only clever for violaters as state organs, even judges who attempt to armtwist it through Legal Sophistry cannot hide in Plain Sight. It will of course smoke you out in Good Time
TO NOTE, the rare instance is Article 25 of the CoK where it EXPRESSLY says NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION of the Constitution, the rights therein cannot be derogated. It does not notwithstanding any provision of the Bill of Rights but of the CoK,
How possibly then did 145(7) override it?
@Javasbigambo@rigathi Haha, use that clip to kubamba watu wa UDA . However, yesterday we all heard loud and clear that Riggy G. was condemned unheard & as a sign of their bad- 'GOOD FAITH' , the 3 'unbiased' judge bench went ahead and said 'Pole Sana' by awarding him KSh 50 million in damages.
It was good that the entire judgment was read word for word and broadcasted live for ten hours to the entire Kenyan public. How else would you have understood the problems we keep pointing out daily about incompetence, misconduct and misbehavior by a Judges?
@pwanyama When this matter gets to the Supreme Court, the question that I want the Apex Court to answer for the future and prosperity of this young democratic country is this:
https://t.co/ga6Lgh8cs6
@joshuamalidzo Now that the H. Court has refrained frm scrutinizing the merits of the grounds for Rt. G.'s impeachment, let me ask: If a future president wakes up one day, accuses his deputy of being fat & successfully directs a captured parliament to impeach him, where does the victim run to?
@Bygones_24 Exactly, the saddest thing is that a section of our judiciary is now setting dangerous precedents that promote this judicial madness, all for political expediency, at the expense of the rule of law & constitutionalism in this country. It's that bad & only God can save us.
@Ndonglaw043 RIGGY G. PRECEDENT IN SUMMARY
"This court finds the accusedโs right to a fair hearing was grossly violated hence he was sentenced to death. However, we uphold the death sentence & in the same breath, award the accused KSh 50 million for the breach of his fair hearing rights."
@joshuamalidzo Now that the H. Court has refrained frm scrutinizing the merits of the grounds for Rt. G.'s impeachment, let me ask: If a future president wakes up one day, accuses his deputy of being fat & successfully directs a captured parliament to impeach him, where does the victim run to?
From onset, I knew Rigathi Gachagua would never find justice before that 3 judge bench. The 350-page judgment & its word-for-word reading for hours was just a kipindiree meant to insinuate how thorough the bench was in its analysis but unjust & predetermined decision was obvious.
@Kibet_bull We all know the impeachment process was a sham. No matter what, I believe the court will have no choice but to lift it ASAP. Riggy G. was impeached in broad daylight, and I believe that everyone regardless of whether they love or hate him knows he was not accorded justice.