@FreiburgCoffeeC@LarryLeisure1 I don't disagree. Its just a probable scenario and I am sure, PDN management is considering it. As a $PDN shareholder I see it positivly. Derisk PLS and hold it in your pipeline. I wouldn't want to see Paladin actually developing it.
@FreiburgCoffeeC@LarryLeisure1 In a real probable scenario that $NXE alone doesn't get to build Arrow. Building the two projects together creates synergies. So be it with a JV between $PDN and $NXE or selling PLS to the one (lets say for example major or a consortium) who gets to build Arrow.
@FreiburgCoffeeC@LarryLeisure1 Unpopular opinion circulating: $PDN isn't interested developing PLS. They just want a piece of the pie when $NXE gets build.
@TommyDeepwater@amarantos_1 Bottom line: I think the government wants to keep the oil option alive, but does not want to say so openly because it is politically sensitive, and I do not see real drilling progress before the elections.
@TommyDeepwater@amarantos_1 Officially, the government has tried to present itself as more focused on natural gas than oil, but in practice, by signing with Chevron and Exxon, it seems to be keeping the door open to exploiting whatever is found, including oil. My issue is that this has not been said clearly
@quakes99 They can’t even stop two trains from colliding head-on, and now they want to play with small modular reactors. As a Greek, that is a hard no from me. We simply do not have the seriousness required to manage nuclear energy responsibly. #nuclear#greece#uranium
@PraiseKek I can accept the risk of a miss. That’s exploration. But using the “it’s a 3-year plan” line as a shield for a potential miss would be disappointing for me.
@PraiseKek 3-year plan or not, the next drilling has to deliver. The market needs a hit. $DEV needs a result that strengthens their credibility and shareholder's confidence.