@SeanMcc244878@seanakerr@chris_sutton73 The image shows the ball is behind his hand, a part of the ball is missing. So if it’s behind his hand it’s obviously hit his head. Which would explain why there was so much power on it and the player himself said it didn’t hit his hand.
@SeanMcc244878@seanakerr@chris_sutton73 Actually it is possible. Place your hand over the left side of your forehead and there’s still space on the right side. The image above shows the ball is behind the hand, not underneath it. As I said before, inconclusive at best.
@seanakerr@SeanMcc244878@chris_sutton73 The amount of times I’ve seen Celtic fans post this picture as proof of handball. If you look at the shape of the ball part of it is missing behind his hand, and looks like the contact will be on his head. Inconclusive as best.
@C_J_Martin_@FootballCliches@DKingTelegraph That’s how I and many others enjoyed football pre VAR. Was a much better experience. I’d happily accept a few bad decisions go against my team if it meant we could do away with it.
And just like that, it’s completely VANISHED from the media.
A sitting congressman, Ted Lieu, said on the record the Epstein files are being blocked because they show Trump raped and threatened to kill children.
Lets make this viral again 👇
@FootballCliches@DKingTelegraph Scrap VAR, and go back to calling offsides clear enough to the human eye. No more millimetre offsides and the concept of being level with the defender can exist again, which is what is happening in the image above.
I really hope there can be a sensible discussion about whether football moves away from VAR
It’s been a number of years now, these aren’t teething troubles anymore, this is an addition to the game that currently takes more away than it gives, with no prospect of that changing.
Yes, there’ll be more things missed, but things like spontaneity & flow contribute hugely to what makes football so great - the trade off, arguably, hasn’t been worth it.
We still get human error, and always will - it just takes a lot longer with VAR
English Football League (EFL) clubs have rejected new Video Assistant Referee (VAR) proposals that would allow head coaches to challenge decisions made on the pitch by brandishing a review card.
At a recent meeting of EFL clubs, the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) — the organisation responsible for professional refereeing in England — demonstrated how the Football Video System (FVS) works.
The FVS is a video replay system that reviews key officiating calls, and it requires head coaches to give a card to the fourth official to signal their intent to challenge the decision.
Unlike the VAR system, the FVS does not use dedicated video match officials, which means it does not automatically review match-altering moments.
Following their last clubs’ meeting, the EFL asked for feedback on the proposals and it became clear that the clubs do not support the implementation of any additional technology.
More from @Dan_Sheldon_: https://t.co/Bjspny6Si2
Retweet for a chance to win
A We Are Live Tour T shirt, a sweatshirt, a bucket hat (all in your size) and a mug
Winner picked at random 10am on Thursday April 23rd
@Marktomo771@TheAdrianDurham Even if you got brilliant officials running it, fans still won’t be able to celebrate goals properly, which should be the best part of football. More stoppages, less goals and a poorer game due to VAR. Football was much more enjoyable without it.