Is this study race-adjusted or are we literally comparing the IQ of a 75% European lineage generation to a 60 % European lineage generation (with the rest made up by Amerindians & Africans).
And we’ll blame the lower IQ on Ipads or whatever.
Just another half-wit analysis by “scientists”.
@rand_longevity Women would, men wouldn’t.
In reality, people date the best they can… but in a theoretical scenario such as above, it’s not symmetrical….men aren’t interested in women that have been with dozens of men.
@cabinsmountain In theory sounds wonderful... In reality, the wife will likely prefer to have sufficient distance away from the inlaws. (Wife next door to her mother inlaw?Nah, unnecessary headaches).
Though you can make it work if it’s the husband that will live near his inlaws.
@Peterhun@Alonso_GD@moo9000 It’s anonymous enough.
They’d have to jump through more hoops to get to you. Plus, citizens feel more free to express their opinions when they enjoy some level of anonymity….this is what these governments are trying to curtail.
@JustKobby98 No lies detected 🤷🏻♂️.
The same disciplined but jarring personality that has made Ronaldo a great player (but in no way the 🐐), has also made him hard to deal with…other great players like Bernardo Silva are just tired of him.
@ArtemisConsort As @pearlythingz said, “if today’s women wanted kids, they’d have them…at 18,19,20 yo”
They’d quickly find men to start families with.
But livin’it up in your 20’s is more fun
Then at 33 you get baby fever. With just enough time to average 1.6 children per woman or whatever
@ArtemisConsort It’s simple,women just don’t want kids.
It’s the first time where women get to choose (not in Afghanistan, less in Africa) but elsewhere, the effects of women’s true freedom is showing.
Kids take decades, alter their body & make them vulnerable
2.1 per woman is too much to ask.
@swanky_moves@Aristotle7777 [to women] “…at 35ish finding a sucker [is] a certainty”
👆 Good one. One more step to understand (for a man) why women act as they do when young.
I’d add, it’s just not worth it to them to lock down w a non-chad.
Then @ 35, they’re a different species and their past hits hard
@mmjukic Don’t know about the specifics, but the idea is spot on.
The last, say, 100 years of “science” contains plenty of garbage, which we instinctively have difficulty getting rid of…so it’s ingrained in our new theses, despite its uselessness or worse, harm.
@alhameenn@Yanaan_B@Fiances_ Just came here to say…. You’re cooking. Your words reveal an age, intellect and wisdom that a fellow anon can detect from far away.👊
@0xSisyphus@AkhiBera I remember the non-crypto account Naval Ravikant shill it once out of the blue, and I found it so odd. Made no sense, from such a (typically) high quality account.
Now I know why.
Probably many such cases.
@tardwife4life 2/2
Don’t “want” it.
For eons women have been compelled to have a man (& his babies) to survive.
Today, it’s no longer the case.
Women can now choose, and they choose no or very few babies.
@tardwife4life that 2nd paragraph is 🔥 Best I’ve seen in some time
Original thought, against conventional wisdom, obv not 100% correct, but more correct than we understand
Rearing children is a tough task, burden falls on women & prob not worth it on an individual level
Of course women …
1/2