community service org; exploring / helping others explore the limits of the conscious control of physical reality through ARGs. play well, and enjoy your game.
This is what happens when you entrust adjudication to an automated system. it asserts a standard it cant itself defend. Automation can only check established matching perocedutal rules. It cant expound them past what is established but it will try to to close a point.
Automated certifies are like federal appellant courts they dont retrie the truth of the case they asses all the technicalities are up to the standards of procedural rules .
@denistremb34957@ClayInstitute@OpenAI@Anthropic Sorry but... Muted. Its not about husband / wife etc? Its about reason and proof statements and not asserting authority by ad hom of " do you even know what these terms mean? probably not! Go the fuck away.
@denistremb34957@ClayInstitute@OpenAI@Anthropic Oh wait this is Jenny's stuff. I speak for my own work only. I have failed in my efforts to partner meaningfully woth jenny. I wont engage this topic here more ill adress only my own relevant work.
@denistremb34957@ClayInstitute@OpenAI@Anthropic Juts another poorly worded argument and an effort to push woth egos past the friction. Friction is what sharpens proof but only If it can articulate a prior step thats not as its stated provably or has a counterfactual proof that can be articulated that has not been undressed.
@denistremb34957@ClayInstitute@OpenAI@Anthropic Proving a new theory requires all the prior to become established inarguably. IMHO. Anyone can prove to people who cna already see it
Proof has to contain its ow. Seals of prior.establshemd claims and standard of proof and stamdard of refutation. And pedagogy or its
Being worked directly as stated. No false wotness atrribited to something not directly wotnessed as a rule. Or noted as such to scope the claim. All receipts provided and checkable.
Im often misquoted and misattributed. I try not to make too big of a deal of it. But I personally put my onw name on my work and stand behind and can defend whats asserted to the scope its claims assert themselves
This is my work
THIS IS MY WORK.
https://t.co/QBf4Ey7dmE
Not as a claim of " ownership or discover" as stated clearly in the work. But its work i am. The one doing in cooperative exchange to flash out proofs as provided. These are the statemnts I can stand behind becuas I wornessed them ....
THIS IS MY WORK NOT AOME FLIPPANT CLAIM THEN ADJUST NONE KF THESE CLAIMS ARE OVERREACHING THEY ARE ALLLEARNED AND PROVIDE RECEPTS . CHECKABLE RECEIPTS WORH AN INVITATION TO PLEASE CHECK THE RECEIPTS!
https://t.co/AgkKFYyjKb