@AFTVMedia There is a dip in his performance lately, the coach needs to be bold enough to bench him,or better still, his colleagues should reduce the pressure on him by focusing more on the left wing
I said no again.
His hand moved before I understood it. My head snapped sideways. My hip hit the counter. A ringing in my ear. Then the fridge humming, the clock ticking, my own breath.
He shook his head. “See what you make me do?”
Not horror. Blame. That was the moment I stopped calling him troubled and started calling him what he was: unsafe.
I’m Muslim, and her question is valid.
The “72 virgins” idea is not in the Quran. The Quran does not give that number at all. What the Quran actually mentions is ḥūr / ḥūr ʿīn (like in 44:54 and 52:20), and it also uses the broader phrase “purified spouses/partners” (2:25).
Also, the Quran’s wording does not lock this reward to “men only.” In Arabic, zawj (partner/spouse) is a pairing word used for either side of a pair, and the Quran describes the reward as pure companionship: clean, refined, beautiful, and emotionally peaceful.
About the root sense: the root (ح و ر) carries the idea of clarity, purity, and striking brightness/contrast. So if someone reads the “essence” of ḥūr, it points to pure, clear companionship (not a crude, sexual fantasy). That is why many people understand it as companions of purity and clarity, for both men and women, not a gendered “virgins for men” story.
So yes: whether it’s a man or a woman, the Quran’s promise is pure companionship and purified partnership in Jannah, and the “72” claim is not Quranic.
@UK_Moyi@EgbeOtumal21796 Fake stories just like one in your book where you know who flew on a donkey in the night and was only witnessed by the donkey and it mentioned in your book that was written by itself