Mandy mccarey

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

You fuck a child, you get executed
You eat a baby, you get executed
You torture children, you get executed
You traffic children, you get executed

It’s so simple even a child can understand it

[S A M M Y Woodhouse @officialsammyuk]

In the UK, the legal age of consent is 16, which means that an adult can legally have sex with a 16- or 17-year-old.

The legal age of consent needs to be raised to 18. We should never encourage or allow adults to have sex with children.

Children in the UK are legally classed as children until they reach the age of 18.

So why does the law allow adults to have sex with 16- and 17-year-olds?

It’s time to close this gap in the law and put the protection of children first. Raise the age of consent to 18.

[Maggie Oliver @MaggieOliverUK]

I Absolutely agree @fionagoddarduk …. There’s always strength in numbers and we need to keep shining the spotlight into the dark corners!

Remember, the devil is always in the detail

And while we’re all focused on the “noise” to the right, what we should really be paying attention to is the silence on the left.

What’s going on to the right is very often merely the distraction…..

[Sandra jane 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sandrajane1966]

Exactly 🇬🇧🇬🇧

[Khushi Harman Kapoor @kapoorkhushi31]

URGENT PUBLIC STATEMENT – HARMAN SINGH KAPOOR

For days, I have been desperately asking the Metropolitan Police for help, protection and assurances regarding the safety of my family and our business.

Despite repeatedly contacting the Met Police and raising serious concerns, I was arrested at my own home this morning and am now in police custody.

What makes this situation even more frightening is that I am in handcuffs while my family is left outside, facing serious safety concerns on the day of the planned protest.

This protest is not simply about our business selling non-halal food. It is also about the harassment, intimidation and threats of violence that my family and I say we have been experiencing.

We have been asking for protection because we fear for our family’s safety. We want to live peacefully, run our business and exercise our rights without fear of being targeted, harassed or harmed.

I find it deeply distressing that, after days of asking the Metropolitan Police for protection, I have been arrested while my family remains worried about their safety.

Who is protecting my family while I am in police custody?

I am calling for:

Immediate protection for my family.
A proper response to our reports of harassment and intimidation.
Protection for our business and staff.
Transparency and accountability from the Metropolitan Police.

No family should have to live in fear. No one should face intimidation or threats because of the food their business chooses to sell.

We are asking for safety, justice, equality and the right to live and work peacefully. Our family’s safety must come first.

Let’s stand together for justice, freedom, equality and a safer Britain. LET’S MAKE BRITAIN GREAT AGAIN! 🇬🇧

— Harman Singh Kapoor

[N Ecc 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Neccccy]

FUCK ISLAM
FUCK MUSLIMS
FUCK SHARIA LAW
FUCK THE QURAN
FUCK OFF FROM OUR COUNTRY

[S A M M Y Woodhouse @officialsammyuk]

Three men from Rotherham have been found guilty, and two of them are on the run.

They should have been remanded in custody to begin with.

Men who rape children are granted bail, but if you slash a dinghy belonging to no one, you get remanded in custody.

Absolute insanity.

https://t.co/lSqTGX7u4X

[Mandy mccarey @Amandamccarey1]

@TRobinsonNewEra @andyburnham They all have 😡😡 scumbags😡😡

[Belfast Live @BelfastLive]

BREAKING https://t.co/Ie8MaNUQak

[Mandy mccarey @Amandamccarey1]

@CityHallTories @Councillorsuzie HIM

[Mandy mccarey @Amandamccarey1]

@sarahwhitetruth What about Huw Edwards? The Grooming Gangs😡😡😡

[War Correspondent @warDaniel47]

You buy a child
You traffic a child
You sell a child
You make videos of a child
You r@pe, molest, groom a child
You enslave a child

You hurt a child, DEATH PENALTY. ☠️

This is not debatable. 💥

If you’re not for that, you will be soon. The public will know what these monsters did for decades to our babies.

We must as a society, ALWAYS defend and protect the innocent. SWIFT AND DEADLY CONSEQUENCES. 💥💥

[N Ecc 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Neccccy]

🚨Andy Burnham has praised the bravery of the women who came forward to report Russell Brand

What about the bravery as well of all the women who have reported the Pakistani rape gangs

And why have you never taken this seriously ever

[Maggie Oliver @MaggieOliverUK]

Our landmark Judicial Review is a HUGE moment for not only survivors and victims of sexual abuse, victims and survivors of grooming gangs or victims and survivors of VAWG…. This impacts survivors of ALL systemic failures and underpins the value of ANY public enquiry…..

If governments refuse to honour their commitments, to accept and implement recommendations of even a 7 year statutory enquiry that heard from 7000 victims/survivors, and are arguing tomorrow that recommendations “ARE NO MORE THAN RECOMMENDATIONS AND DO NOT CARRY ANY LEGAL FORCE”…. and it’s their CHOICE whether or not to bring in these changes, then the question has to be asked - why then are we going into yet another public enquiry led by @annelongfield when there’s no promise of action!! And that’s not the fault of any panel, it’s the governments lack of action afterwards!!!

And this is also very relevant to all survivors everywhere of other public enquiries….of @PostOffice scandal, @grenfellinquiry @covidinquiryuk etc etc and is exactly what families in the Nottingham enquiry are saying, Hillsborough and now the death of Henry Novak… where is @andyburnham “duty of candour” in all this fiasco!!

This case has far reaching consequences so please support and share our stand for ordinary people being failed by successive governments. Being promised action when none ever follows…. Lots more to be said but read my opinion piece below.

We’re at The Royal Courts of Justice tomorrow, 9.30am so please come and support this action….. @TMOFCharity is having to fight this for every survivor who has been given false hope, false promises and is to protect future generations of children from being similarly failed in the years ahead….

Click the comments in the story below to read the full article….

[The Maggie Oliver Foundation @TMOFCharity]

A charity supporting survivors every day, founded by a former detective who sacrificed her career exposing these failures, is being challenged over its right to question government inaction.

If we cannot challenge these failures, then who can?
But perhaps even more astonishing is the Government’s reliance on parliamentary privilege.

Its lawyers argue that promises made by ministers in the House of Commons are protected by parliamentary privilege and cannot be relied upon in the way our legal challenge contends.

They have even sought the intervention of the Speaker of the House of Commons in connection with these arguments, seeking to prevent those parliamentary statements being used to support our case, even though they’ve also been said outside the House repeatedly!

To me, this is yet another “abuse of power’, an attempt to hide behind parliamentary procedure rather than answer the fundamental questions.

What message does that send to the British public?
Are we seriously expected to accept that ministers can stand in Parliament, make solemn promises to protect children, and subsequently argue those promises cannot be relied upon?

If promises made in the House of Commons cannot be trusted, what on earth can the British public believe?
The Government also argues that it is under no legal obligation to implement public inquiry recommendations.

So why spend hundreds of millions investigating failures, hearing heartbreaking evidence and promising change, if governments can simply walk away afterwards?

Our challenge has attracted support from across the country.

Three courageous women, each personally failed in different ways by institutions entrusted to protect them, have provided statements supporting our case.

These women know the lifelong consequences of abuse and institutional betrayal - indeed one of them is now bringing up her granddaughter as her daughter was so hugely failed she tragically took her own life! It actually would have been her birthday today…..

They are standing alongside us because they desperately want to prevent other children suffering as they have.

Their voices matter.

We are also grateful for the support of children’s rights charity Article 39.

This case is not about me. It is about those women, and countless others failed by the system, and future generations of children.

Since IICSA published its recommendations in 2022, an estimated two million children have since experienced sexual abuse, based on the inquiry’s annual prevalence estimate.

How many might have been better protected had meaningful action followed?

Instead, public money is being spent resisting our challenge.

In March, a High Court judge granted permission for our judicial review, describing it as “a paradigm example of public interest litigation.”

Yet the Government continues to challenge our right to bring it.

On Tuesday, our legal team will address these arguments as we ask the Court to examine the Government’s failure to honour its commitments.
I sincerely hope the judge recognises the enormous significance of what is at stake.

Because this case could have far-reaching consequences for every future public inquiry, every ministerial promise and every citizen who expects those in power to be accountable.

We want the new Grooming Gangs Inquiry to succeed. We are working constructively with its team. But unless something changes, what prevents its recommendations being ignored too?

The families of the Nottingham case and Henry Nowak deserve more than another report gathering dust. So do the thousands of survivors who trusted IICSA with their most painful experiences.

An inquiry must be the beginning of accountability and change, not the end of it.

And all of this doesn’t even begin to address another enormous issue — the almost complete absence of personal accountability for those responsible for these catastrophic failures.

Time and again, children and vulnerable people are failed, lives are destroyed, and yet those in positions of power who made the decisions, ignored the warnings or turned a blind eye rarely face any meaningful consequences.

No criminal accountability. No personal responsibility. Just more apologies, reviews and promises that lessons will be learned.

But that is another battle, and a subject for another day.

I have spent much of my life challenging powerful institutions that would rather protect themselves than confront uncomfortable truths.

I will not stop now.

Public inquiries must deliver change, not provide governments with an expensive escape route from responsibility.

The greatest cost of government inaction is not measured in millions of pounds.

It is measured in children’s lives, shattered childhoods and suffering that could have been prevented.

Those children deserve better.

The British public deserves better.

And promises made to protect our children MUST mean something.

[The Maggie Oliver Foundation @TMOFCharity]

On Tuesday 10 November, my charity The Maggie Oliver Foundation, funded entirely by private donations, begins what I believe could be one of the most significant legal challenges in recent history.

Not just for victims of child sexual abuse, but for every British citizen who believes governments should be held accountable for their promises.

We are taking the Government to the High Court over its failure to implement vital recommendations from the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA).

But this is about something much bigger.

I believe governments have increasingly used hugely expensive public inquiries to deflect criticism, avoid uncomfortable truths and kick difficult decisions into the long grass, whilst giving the public the illusion that something is being done.

I have spent over twenty years exposing corruption and catastrophic institutional failures to protect children. I have witnessed the devastating consequences and the extraordinary lengths public bodies will go to protect themselves rather than the children they are supposed to safeguard.

And I believe we are witnessing that same culture of avoidance in the Government’s defence of our judicial review.

IICSA took seven years, heard from over 7,000 survivors and cost taxpayers more than £200 million. It produced 20 recommendations intended to protect children.

Four years later, the key recommendations remain unimplemented.

Yet rather than delivering those changes, the Government has commissioned another three-year inquiry into grooming gangs, costing an estimated £65 million.

Another inquiry. Another enormous bill for taxpayers. Another opportunity to kick the ball further down the road.I believe public inquiries have become convenient political tools. When public outrage becomes impossible to ignore, governments announce an inquiry. Political pressure subsides, years pass, governments change and recommendations quietly gather dust. The problem again “kicked into the long grass”!.

Meanwhile, children continue to suffer.

And this is not confined to child sexual abuse.

Look at the families of those murdered in Nottingham, who have also fought relentlessly to expose catastrophic failures by the very agencies entrusted with protecting the public. Their determination to secure accountability and meaningful change is something I understand only too well.

And now we have the heartbreaking case of 18-year-old Henry Nowak, brutally murdered in December 2025. His family has had to fight for answers about warnings and opportunities that were missed before his death, and about how they were treated by the criminal justice system afterwards.

Yet another independent review has now been announced.

Different tragedies. Different families.

But the same fundamental question: why does it take unimaginable suffering, public outrage and relentless campaigning before the State confronts its failures?

And crucially, what happens when these inquiries and reviews conclude?

This is a horrific neglect of government’s most fundamental duty — to protect its citizens, particularly its most vulnerable.

Our challenge highlights fundamental protections: mandatory collection of data about sexual abusers and victims; outlawing pain-inducing compliance techniques used against children in custody; proper regulation of staff working with vulnerable children in care; a dedicated Cabinet-level Minister for Children; and ensuring victims’ rights under the Victims’ Code are properly respected.

These are basic safeguards, not unreasonable demands.

Yet what again disgusts me the most is the extraordinary lengths the Government is prepared to go to in resisting our challenge.

Its lawyers have seemingly used every trick in the book to prevent the Government being held accountable.
They argue that neither I nor The Maggie Oliver Foundation has the legal standing to bring this case.

Think about that.

[N Ecc 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Neccccy]

If Russell Brand is serving over 10 years then this cunt should be as well.

Do you agree?

[Laurence Fox @LozzaFox]

In amongst all the cheering that we have salved our national rape conscience by finding a rapist onto whom we can pin all our outrage and disgust, people miss the salient points about what this judgement and sentence will have on the justice system we all rely on.

I’ll just detail Adils crime and sentence below and you make you own mind up…

Adil Rashid (2012): Convicted of raping a 13-year-old; received 9 months after the judge accepted a defence that he “did not know” the act was wrong due to his background and upbringing.

Justice isn’t blind. Her eyes are wide open.

[Talk @TalkTV]

🚨"She was sexually abused from the age of 12. Two years ago she took her own life. She was 33."

Julia Hartley-Brewer talks to Michelle, whose daughter was a victim of grooming gang abuse and tragically committed suicide due to the failures she endured.

@JuliaHB1

[Inevitable West @Inevitablewest]

🚨BREAKING: Polish prosecutors have officially announced there is 'NO EVIDENCE' the terrorist in Kraków was far-right, declaring Donald Tusk's government LIARS

Tusk must RESIGN immediately!