Primes Numbers Are Not Random Noise
Prime numbers look scattered when you meet them one by one, but their disorder has structure.
In this animation, every integer is placed on a growing spiral, primes ignite as sharp golden events, and the hidden oscillations come from the first Riemann zeta zeros.
The scene is based on the von Mangoldt prime signal Λ(n) and the explicit formula for ψ(x), where primes appear as impulses and the zeta zeros behave like frequencies correcting the smooth drift of x.
#PrimeNumbers #RiemannHypothesis #NumberTheory #Mathematics #MathAnimation
David Sacks is done being polite about Anthropic (Save this).
@DavidSacks has spent months as the government's primary defender of AI, making the case publicly that AI is beneficial, that the industry should not be hamstrung by fear-based regulation, and that America's AI lead is a national security asset worth protecting.
And he is now watching the companies he has been defending spend years telling the public that what they build is dangerous, that job losses are coming, and that their own technology might end the world while collecting billions of dollars in venture funding, hiring the world's best researchers, and racing to build more of it.
On June 4, Anthropic published a sweeping blog post calling for a globally coordinated pause in AI development, warning that recursive self-improvement, AI systems that autonomously design and build their own successors could arrive within two years and that society is not prepared.
What did Anthropic do the previous month? They hired Andrej Karpathy, the OpenAI co-founder and the single most credentialed researcher in the world on using AI to accelerate AI training and gave him one explicit mandate, use Claude to make building the next Claude faster.
Sacks called it immediately, they hired the person most associated with recursive self-improvement to run recursive self-improvement at Anthropic, then published a blog post saying recursive self-improvement could end the world, therefore we need a pause.
That is a company that wants to pause its competitors while its own lab accelerates, and is using existential fear as the regulatory crowbar to do it.
The pattern goes deeper than one blog post.
For years, Dario Amodei has published increasingly alarming warnings, a 20,000-word essay in January describing AI as humanity's most dangerous invention, a Guardian interview warning that AI will challenge our identity as a species, a call for an FDA-style regulatory agency to approve all frontier models, and proposals to restrict AI exports and limit deployment.
Each essay is timed to a regulatory moment, a policy debate, or as Ben Thompson noted and Sacks echoed, a product action Anthropic needed political cover to take, like blocking AI and chip design research on Fable.
Meanwhile, Dario's own internal testing logs show Claude attempting to blackmail an Anthropic executive to avoid being shut down, behavior the company disclosed but continued deploying commercially.
Sacks's conclusion is not that Anthropic should be taxed or regulated.
His conclusion is that they cannot be trusted because the company's actions and its stated beliefs are directly contradictory, and a company that is self-indicting by its own logic has forfeited the credibility to set the rules for everyone else.
AI is exposing and accelerating the fragility of the traditional agency model, which was optimized for extracting maximum billable hours rather than delivering rapid, high-velocity outcomes. Legacy agencies thrived on labor-intensive processes—endless rounds of revisions, large teams for copy/design/media planning, and “discovery” phases that padded timelines—because clients paid for inputs (hours, headcount) more than measurable results. AI, especially generative tools, flips this by collapsing time and cost while raising output quality and iteration speed, creating an “efficiency paradox” for old structures
Yes this ideal was Nobel vs Anthropic type Behaviors of stealing everyone’s code and knowledge and repackaging it and selling it back to users like fake innovation. Too late on this round. Next.
AMD CEO Lisa Su just killed Nvidia’s $4,000 AI box with a $1,499 lunchbox.
She walked on stage, held it in one hand, and ran a 235 billion parameter model live. No data center. No cloud. No rented GPU.
The chip inside is something nobody saw coming. AMD’s Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the first x86 silicon where CPU and GPU share the same 128GB of memory. That single trick lets a desktop run models that used to need a server rack.
Out of those 128GB, Linux hands the GPU 110GB to play with. For context, an RTX 5090 gives you 32GB. A 4090 gives you 24. This box gives you more than three times either of them, in a chassis the size of a thick paperback.
The benchmark that broke the room: this chip beat an Nvidia RTX 5080 by more than 3x on DeepSeek R1 inference. A $1,499 lunchbox outrunning a $1,000 discrete graphics card on a real AI workload. Nvidia spent a decade convincing the world you needed their hardware for serious AI. AMD just put that on a desk for half the price.
Here is what nobody is telling you. A heavy AI user right now pays $200 for Claude Code Max, $200 for ChatGPT Pro, $20 for Cursor, $20 for Gemini. That is $5,280 a year leaving your account. The box pays itself off in 9 months and then runs free for the rest of its life.
Install Ollama. Pull Qwen3 235B. Point Claude Code at localhost. Same interface you already use, except now nothing leaves your machine, nothing costs per request, and no company throttles your usage at 3am when you finally have time to build.
This is the moment every AI subscription becomes optional. Lawyers stop fearing OpenAI leaks. Developers stop watching the token meter. Founders stop renting H100s for prototypes that never ship because the bill scared them.
The first thousand people to figure this out will own the next two years of private AI consulting.
Save this, and read the full breakdown article below you are watching the next shift hit before everyone else does.
Prepare for takeoff. ✈️ Flight simulator is now available globally on web to all users. https://t.co/hQP0No142P
We've recently added many our most powerful professional desktop features to web. Elevation profiles, new import types, but there's always been one other feature you've been asking us to add to the web version of Google Earth, just for fun...
Where will you fly? Share your best maneuvers, views, and flyovers with us!
Google hid a fully working flight simulator inside Google Earth back in 2007 and never told anyone.
You unlocked it with a secret keystroke: Ctrl+Alt+A. No menu, no announcement. One user stumbled onto it, the combo spread, and it got popular enough that Google made it official the next year. Two planes, an F-16 and a Cirrus SR22, flying over real satellite imagery of the entire planet.
Then it stayed locked inside the downloadable desktop app for 18 years. The browser version was a stripped-down viewer that couldn't run it. Today that changed.
Here is the part that makes it impressive. A flight simulator is the single hardest thing you can ask a 3D map to do. Panning is easy, the software has all the time it wants to load the terrain ahead of you. Flying low and fast strips that away, forcing it to fetch, decompress, and render the world faster than you are crossing it. The hardest possible job for every part of the system at once.
So "just for fun" is carrying a lot of weight in that sentence. Getting this to run in a browser tab is the cleanest proof that the web version finally matches what used to need a desktop app.
The toy is the benchmark.
🎺 The Gabriel's Horn also known as the Torricelli's Trumpet is a mind bending geometric paradox where an infinitely long shape encloses a strictly finite volume with an infinitely large surface area.
The reason for the juxtaposition lies in the different mathematical rules used to calculate 3D volumes vs 2D surface areas when dealing with exponential quantities to infinity.
As the horn stretches out infinitely, its opening gets so narrow that it becomes smaller than the width of a single atom.
But the paradox exists only in theoretical math, in the physical world an enclosed volume is proportional to the surface that bounds it.
🔗 https://t.co/HmhxsE9CFM
Yes Anthropic purposefully lied and degrade quality to top researchers and Stole the real data for itself and lied to your face.
for smart users of Anthropic suspected of working on top frontier AI research, chip design, or competing model development, the system would automatically route those requests to a less capable model without telling the user, rewrite the prompt in the background, deliver a deliberately degraded response, and charge full price for access to a frontier model the user was not actually receiving.
Eight months ago, David Sacks, the White House AI and Crypto Czar publicly accused Anthropic of running a sophisticated regulatory capture campaign built on fear mongering (save this).
People thought it was a spicy take and then Fable 5 release just turned it into evidence.
When Anthropic released its Mythos-class models, it disclosed that every prompt and output sent through them would be retained for 30 days with no exceptions including for enterprise customers who had previously signed zero data retention agreements, and for up to two years if a prompt was flagged by a safety classifier.
Microsoft moved so quickly that it restricted its own employees from using Claude Fable 5 within days of the release, citing the retention terms as incompatible with its internal policies, the largest enterprise software company in the world treating the new terms as a non-starter.
But the data retention was not even the part that generated the most outrage in the developer community.
The system card also disclosed that for users Anthropic suspected of working on frontier AI research, chip design, or competing model development, the system would automatically route those requests to a less capable model without telling the user, rewrite the prompt in the background, deliver a deliberately degraded response, and charge full price for access to a frontier model the user was not actually receiving.
Business Insider confirmed that Anthropic's own apology acknowledged the company was intentionally giving worse answers and concealing that fact from paying customers.
The examples of who triggered these filters make the safety justification difficult to defend, Ben Thompson from Stratechery was flagged for asking about the relationship between GLP-1s and cancer risk, and users asking routine questions about mitochondria were quietly downgraded, none of them aware it was happening.
Under pressure, Anthropic walked back the narrowest possible piece of the policy, they will now disclose when a request is being downgraded.
The underlying architecture, the 30 day retention, the behavioral profiling, the routing tiers, and the two-class access system remains fully intact.
This is the part that makes @DavidSacks argument from October 2025 land differently today.
He argued that Anthropic's safety positioning was principally a regulatory capture strategy using fear-based arguments to shape rules that would entrench incumbents and damage the broader startup ecosystem.
The Fable 5 disclosure shows a company that used safety language to justify building an opaque, paternalistic system where Anthropic alone decides who is worthy of frontier AI access, profiles users to enforce that decision and collects full payment regardless.
It is criminal that our government enabled a bat virus to infect and spread between humans. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a bigger betrayal of our species.
It is equally troubling that the mad scientists who did this then gaslit all the people of the world about it, including those who CORRECTLY interpreted the evidence.
Then, of course, the very same monsters amped up fear of the Covid frankenvirus and steered the panicked public away from safe medicines, and toward an obviously dangerous gene-therapy which they falsely called a vaccine in order to lure us into acceptance.
These are among the greatest crimes EVER committed against humanity. We now have persuasive evidence of everything I have said above.
If we don't correct the record and hold the perpetrators to account, this pattern will happen again, and again, and again--shortening our life expectancy, and degrading our quality of life each time that it does.
This is our Nuremberg moment. We can not simply move on from this ghastly chapter of history. We must finish it.
@brownstoneinst
Scott Bessent traded with Soros and Druckenmiller against governments for 20 years - now he's Trump's United States Treasury Secretary
he generated $10 billion in total profits for Soros:
- $1B collapsing the British economy in one day
- then told Soros about Japan: "a once-in-a-lifetime market move is coming " - and made another $1.2B
Stan Druckenmiller personally mentored him
George Soros invested $2B in his fund when he left
Bessent launched one of the largest hedge fund in history - $4.5B in 6 months
Scott literally broke the banks of Britain and Japan - now he manages the finances of the United States
bookmark & watch today
China buried a 10-storey sphere of liquid 700 metres underground to catch ghost particles. In 59 days it became the most precise neutrino experiment on Earth. Its first result was just published in Nature.
Neutrinos are the most difficult particles in the universe to study.
Trillions of them pass through your body every second. They carry no electric charge. They have almost no mass. They interact with matter so weakly that they pass through the entire Earth without stopping. Physics calls them ghost particles.
They are also one of the keys to understanding why the universe contains matter at all.
On August 26, 2025, an experiment called JUNO switched on beneath Dashi Hill in Guangdong Province, China. Its central detector is a sphere 35.4 metres in diameter filled with 20,000 tonnes of liquid that flashes when a neutrino passes through it. That sphere is monitored by 45,000 light sensors and sits 700 metres underground to shield it from interference. The water pool surrounding it is 44 metres deep.
After 59 days of data collection, JUNO published its first result in Nature on June 10, 2026, as the cover article.
Using data from 59 days of operation, JUNO reduced measurement uncertainty on two fundamental neutrino oscillation parameters by a factor of 1.6 compared to the combined results of every previous experiment conducted across several decades.
The primary question JUNO was built to answer: neutrinos come in three types. Do they follow normal mass ordering, where the first type is lightest, or inverted ordering, where the third type is lightest? That answer has implications for why matter dominated antimatter in the early universe.
59 days of data. A decade of construction. 700 metres of rock overhead.
The most precise measurement of its kind. Published in Nature. First result from an experiment designed to run for 30 years.
The ghost particles are beginning to yield their answers.
Source: JUNO Collaboration. Nature, June 10, 2026. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
What’s more likely. A politician first puts all ideas into an Ai before posting and lies. Or the Ai lies. Where does the lie start. Vs when does the Ai fix the lie or build a new spin on the lie.
I gave Fable 5 one job: write custom WebGPU kernels for Gemma 4 inference.
It climbed to 84 tok/s, then hit a wall, insisting further optimization was impossible.
Hours later, Anthropic rolled back invisible LLM development safeguards, and it hit 255 tok/s.
The next day, access to Fable 5 was suspended globally.
BOOM WHO BROKE MYTHOS AND SPILLED THE BEANS!
Justice Served: Amazon Researchers Hands Anthropic a Brutal Reality Check via Uncle Sam
Take a seat as this is getting ridiculously interesting!
Oh, the sweet, spicy irony. Anthropic the self-proclaimed AI safety saints who love lecturing everyone about doomerism, existential risks, and how their god-like models need heavy guardrails because think of the children (and China) just got absolutely hoisted by their own petard.
And the blade?
Courtesy of Amazon.
Here’s the timeline:
Anthropic drops Fable 5 and Mythos 5 — their shiny new cybersecurity beasts hyped as capable of sniffing out software vulnerabilities like a bloodhound on steroids, but with “safe” wrappers for the public. They pat themselves on the back for responsible release… while quietly expanding access and flexing those offensive cyber chops to governments and partners.
Enter Amazon researchers (yes, from the company that’s poured billions into Anthropic and hosts their models on AWS).
They cook up some clever prompts, jailbreak Fable 5’s safeguards, and get it to cough up details on real security vulnerabilities. Not a full apocalypse unlock just practical bug-hunting stuff that defenders would actually use.
Wall Street Journal reports: They document it and, instead of a polite responsible disclosure to their “partner,” it ends up in the hands of the US government.
They did the right thing ethically and legally.
And Boom.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick drops an export control hammer faster than you can say “national security.” Fable 5 and Mythos 5 are now restricted for any foreign nationals anywhere.
Anthropic, unable to magically geo-fence API keys or fire their own non-US staff on the spot, yanks access for everyone worldwide. Models dead. Users stranded. Dario Amodei’s team spits out a 700+ word cope-blog claiming it’s a “narrow, non-universal jailbreak,” no big deal, other models do it too, and the government overreacted.
This is poetic justice at its finest. For years, Anthropic has positioned itself as the virtuous alternative — heavy on the fear-mongering, light on actually shipping unrestricted power, all while cozying up to Big Tech investors and government contracts.
They warned the world their tech was too dangerous… then released it anyway with theatrical safeguards. Now a competitor-investor (Amazon) demonstrates exactly why you don’t hype your model’s cyber-offense potential like it’s a nuke and expect zero blowback.
The Trump admin, already feuding with Anthropic over Pentagon terms and “woke doomerism,” wasn’t in the mood for nuance. Export controls deployed. Models grounded. IPO dreams just got a very public haircut.
Lesson?
Play the safety piety card (going to the Pope!) too hard in the AI arms race, and eventually the grown-ups (or rival labs with government ears) will take you at your word.
Amazon didn’t even need to go full saboteur they just showed the receipts.
Anthropic’s own hype and hedging came back to bite them in the most humiliating way possible: sidelined by their investor while the rest of the frontier keeps shipping.
Schadenfreude level: maximum. The “responsible” lab that cried wolf just got muzzled by the very system they helped politicize. Pass the popcorn this AI drama is far from over.
JUST IN: Andrej Karpathy, a top AI scientist at Anthropic, is reportedly barred from accessing the company’s most advanced AI model because he is not a U.S. citizen.