Gramsci en colère

[Gramsci en colère @AmericanDevine]

"I'm not willing to surrender every issue I care about to become an accomplice in this moral squalor & death march to extinction. In the end, I do not fight fascists because I will win. I fight fascists because they're fascists." - Chris Hedges

https://t.co/Tm0SIXhZFR

[Assal Rad @AssalRad]

Prime Minister of Israel: “Nobody will stop us – not The Hague”

[Jehad Abusalim @JehadAbusalim]

Why must my family be buried under rubble as a form of penance for the sins of modern Germans' grandparents, who served as SS officers and camp guards?

[Justin Amash @justinamash]

One of the most frequently misrepresented federal statutes—often falsely used to justify unconstitutional presidential war powers—is the War Powers Resolution (or Act) (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541-1550).

If only more people would read it.

Contrary to what you may have heard about the War Powers Resolution, it does not allow the president to take military action for any reason for 60-90 days without congressional approval so long as the president notifies Congress within 48 hours.

Section 1541(c) of the War Powers Resolution states clearly:

"The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

Of the three cited authorities, not one indicates a presidential power to take unilateral (without Congress's approval) offensive military action.

The first two authorities allow the president to take offensive military action but only with Congress's express approval (Article I of the Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war). The third authority allows the president to take defensive military action without Congress's approval in the event of a specific type of national emergency, a sudden unforeseen attack on the United States (happening too quickly for Congress to meet) necessitating immediate action to protect Americans.

It's for this last situation (or for situations in which the president introduces forces into hostilities unlawfully) that the War Powers Resolution provides for the oft-mentioned 48-hour report to Congress (§ 1543) and 60-day (up to 90-day) timeline (§ 1544). If there's an attack in progress on the United States (i.e., currently happening), we expect the president to respond swiftly to neutralize the attack and protect Americans—and then we will hold the president to account.

The Framers of the Constitution agreed at the debates in the federal convention of 1787 that the president should have the "power to repel sudden attacks" but not the power to otherwise introduce forces into hostilities without congressional approval.

The War Powers Resolution does not confer any new authority on the president to take offensive military action without congressional approval—nor could it under our Constitution. It instead checks the president when, as the Framers contemplated, the president introduces our Armed Forces into hostilities to repel a sudden attack.

[Sulaiman Ahmed @ShaykhSulaiman]

THIS IS TERRORISM

[Nina Turner @ninaturner]

Tonight, @JoeBiden dropped bombs on Yemen without Congressional approval.

[River Page @river_is_nice]

DC gay phenotype. Kinda crazy how they look the same in every country.

[Noah Khrachvik @khrachvik]

This should not happen.

This happens because our government serves the conglomerate. Not her.

#OfByAndForTHEPEOPLE

[Edward Snowden @Snowden]

When I worked for the Bush-era CIA—down the street from the @UN HQs—I learned we were relentlessly infiltrating & undermining UN and @IAEAorg (nearby in Vienna) bodies to thwart perceived anti-war "lawfare." Hard to imagine @CIJ_ICJ won't face similar efforts to prevent justice.

[Chris Morlock @CDMorlock]

Your shitty empire looks dead.

[African @ali_naka]

I am Proud of this Flag !! It’s not South Africa vs Israel. But it’s humanity vs Israel. The rest of you lot can lower your useless flags for the next 72 hours !

[Gramsci en colère @AmericanDevine]

@elonmusk @X Please reinstate the Palestinian Gazan account @Abdullah_Om3r03.

[Abdullah Omar🇵🇸 @Abdullah_Om3r03]

Hello, my account has been restricted for three days
Israel is trying to suspend my account
Please support my account by following, retweeting, and commenting so that my account does not stop
✌️🇵🇸🙏

[Sana Saeed @SanaSaeed]

Watching the first ICJ hearing. It is devastating to see it all laid out, so clearly, after having watched the horrors inflicted on Palestinians by Israel, for 96 days.

But it is so very clear & undeniable, as South Africa argues, that this is a genocide.

[Sarah Wilkinson @swilkinsonbc]

A Palestinian child is forced to pick up the body parts of his family members: NO child EVER should have to do this | #IsraeliButchers

[Nour Naim| نُور @NourNaim88]

The last video of the angel "Lara" taken by her martyred mother Samah Naim, on the morning of the day that Israeli rockets killed them.

Look at the baby’s eyes, and don't look away !!

[Gramsci en colère @AmericanDevine]

Please reinstate the pro-Palestinian account @aerielist

@elonmusk @X

[Gramsci en colère @AmericanDevine]

@rdsathene Vote for Jill Stein and get the Green Party over the 5% threshold for federal campaign financing. Your three choices agree on policy, so why not build an organization lasting beyond the 2024 campaign?

[Gramsci en colère @AmericanDevine]

@Abdullah_Om3r03 France

[Gramsci en colère @AmericanDevine]

@kthalps might be interested in this "blessing" of Britain's chief rabbi:

[Jonathan Cook @Jonathan_K_Cook]

Britain’s chief rabbi, Ephraim Mirvis, enthuses about the crimes against humanity being perpetrated in Gaza by what he calls “our heroic soldiers” – yes, if you or I conflated the Jewish people with Israel, we’d be called antisemites.

He then reveals that his son, Danny, is among the soldiers in Gaza. He says he is “immensely proud” of what these soldiers are doing in Gaza – so far they have killed 23,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children.

He concludes: “What Israel is doing is the most outstanding possible thing that a decent, responsible country can do for its citizens.”

Is Mirvis not giving his religious blessing to genocide here?

[Gramsci en colère @AmericanDevine]

This tweet seems to come from an authentic account. Please let me know the author's area code so that I can avoid going near him.

[Muhammad Shehada @muhammadshehad2]

Gaza before & after: Israeli media is showing these pictures today as an achievement.

These neighbourhoods were 1st bombed from air, then IDF soldiers blew up what remained with explosives & IDF bulldozers razed these areas completely.

The IDF is the one that took these images!