Zohran Mamdani calls us monsters and masters of bloodshed because this Al Jazeera journalist lost his life.
Here's what the journalist looks like.
The only monster here is Zohran Mamdani, not American Jews or AIPAC.
@JoshKraushaar@jacobkornbluh
@nick_matau Notice Vance's F-up? He talks about Iran DENUCLEARIZING....which was a day one goal - zero nuclear material...and then corrects himself to allow them to have all the nukes they want, as long as they keep the bomb making part hidden from inspectors.
https://t.co/HRZmMy96m2
@JesseBWatters So the inspectors, under whom Iran got close to building a nuclear weapon under Obama will be allowed back in so Iran can attempt to build a nuclear weapon under Trump and his successor. 40,000+ innocents dead with broken promises from Trump to help tehm.
This blatantly irresponsible reporting does more harm to people than they realize.
Using Tesla self-driving is far safer than manual driving, and this was measured over 10B miles.
Planting such FUD in the minds of general public, who might not know the all the facts, might prevent them from using this technology that makes them safer.
@antibearthesis It's finding it's level. It's a new stock with a lot of hype. A lot of people wanted to buy it and that drove up the price. The people who "had to have it" now have it. The profit takers and many who held it privately are now selling to lock in gains.
Liri Albag, who was held hostage in Gaza:
"I realized there were no uninvolved civilians. They think Hitler was a genius. It was hell. You could see the evil in their eyes, evil eyes. The Gazan crowd ran after us, cheering, shooting in the air, children, women."
Share this.
@michael_on_x_@OverlyTrev Explain the NY Times headline that says officials state that the car was on auto pilot. No allegedly. No “according to driver” … and then they include a photo of full self driving to double down on their point.
@OverlyTrev NY Times first line ("The driver told investigators") literally contradicts the headline ("Tesla Driver USING AUTOPILOT ... Officials Say"). @elonmusk - @tesla_na needs to sue the NY Times over this headline lie - how many sales will it cost? How much added mistrust over a lie?
Dear @realDonaldTrump
If Iran did not want Hezbollah to fire at Israel.
Hezbollah would not fire.
Iran signs deal.
Tells Hezbollah to attack
Israel responds
Iran claims ceasefire broken.
U.S. pressures Israel
Israel gets blame
Iran wins more concessions
STOP BEING STUPID!
@japan_nobunaga A - more for good service or an inexpensive breakfast meal. Diner wait staff works really hard for your inexpensive breakfast with multiple coffee refills
David Sacks just delivered an economics masterclass on Elon becoming the world’s first trillionaire.
@davidsacks: “People see the headline and imagine Elon suddenly has a trillion dollars in the bank. That’s not how it works. His balance sheet didn’t change overnight.”
Why?
The real point is deeper. Wealth isn’t in the “stuff” we consume. Food, shelter, clothes. Things that depreciate and disappear. It’s in the machines that create stuff for decades: tools, workflows, and corporations.
These are the true engines of human progress.
“If you create a machine that makes more stuff, then there’s a discounted present value for all the stuff in the future that machine might create. That’s where the wealth comes from.”
Elon started with nothing. An immigrant who slept on the floor building Zip2. He created these machines from vision and relentless effort. Thousands joined him, including a SpaceX welder who turned his labor into a million dollars in stock.
That’s the magic of tech and free markets: labor can become capital. It’s fluid.
The outrage misses this entirely. The people building machines that deliver medicines, energy, and abundance are creating lasting prosperity for everyone.
What do you think? Does viewing wealth as future productivity change how you see stories like this?