Amplifying the voices of Iranians inside Iran🇮🇷—their demands, their agency, their fight. A psychological lens on the Islamic Republic’s control mechanisms.
Crown Prince @PahlaviReza ALWAYS standing up for Iranians.
Clear vision, unbreakable courage, & a heart for his people. ❤️
He’s the voice of millions who dream of a free & proud Iran. 🇮🇷
Thank you, Your Highness!
#RezaPahlaviForIran
The legitimacy of the case against the Islamic republic is first and foremost rooted in the demands of the Iranian people inside Iran, who have repeatedly risen up, most recently in the millions, to demand an end to this regime. In this movement, there has been only one name they have called for, and only one transitional leadership the Iranian people have fought for: @PahlaviReza.
Now that doesn’t mean every Iranian is a monarchist, and it doesn’t mean “restoring monarchy” either. If fact, Pahlavi himself has called for a transition to democracy and has only ever called for a transition leadership. Many people are calling for Pahlavi today who did not support the Shah in the past. The world is still talking over them.
Instead of listening to the Iranian people, the international media and multiple governments around the world have consistently proposed plan after plan, actively ignoring the will of the Iranian people. They have minimized and in some cases even mocked the Crown Prince, when he and he alone has the ear of the people on the ground. There have been well funded and coordinated efforts against the Crown Prince attempting to cast doubt on his popularity with the Iranian public and to spread rumors that anyone who supports him as a traditional leader is “restoring monarchy”. He has been accused of all sorts of absurdities from being an “Israeli agent” to being asked to answer for political decisions of his father that have nothing to do with him and still he has maintained the respect and support of the Iranian people.
This is a cataclysmic mistake on the part of the West. Iran is not Afghanistan or Venezuela. You will never have a successful foreign imposed leader like the terrorist Ghalibaf when the people are calling for something else entirely.
How many times must the west repeat the same mistakes over and over against expecting different results?
PERSPECTIVE
Not only haven’t we armed the Iranian people, we’re actually strengthening the regime internally with hundreds of billions of dollars and other huge concessions making it virtually impossible to be overthrown from within or collapse from our previous crushing military offensive and economic blockade. We don’t even mention the Iranian people anymore.
We’re also legitimizing the Iranian regime not just in the region but internationally through diplomacy generally, as well as direct diplomacy with the regime, and now direct military-to-military contacts with the IRGC, the equivalent of the Nazi SS, which we treat as a breakthrough.
At the same time, we’re isolating our ally Israel, who valiantly fought by our side when we launched this war just a few months ago, undermining its defenses including via protections for Hezbollah, F-35s planned for Turkey, and hundreds of billions for Iran, as well as publicly ridiculing its Churchillian prime minister in the lead up to its election, which is intended to defeat him, while praising the genocidal Iranian regime and surrounding Islamist regimes, in one of the most shocking flips in military and diplomatic history.
من بهزودی زیر پست انگلیسی شما نظر خواهم گذاشت، اما مهم است که درک کنید موضع ائتلاف کابینه ترامپ درباره جنگهای خارجی را میتوان بهطور کلی به سه گروه تقسیم کرد:
۱. سرسختترین صداهای «اول آمریکا» علیه جنگ و تغییر رژیم + دارای دیدگاههای انتقادی نسبت به اسرائیل
- جیدی ونس خبیث
- استیو بنن
- تولسی گبرد
۲. جناح دیپلماسی و خویشتنداری + مخالف تغییر رژیم
- دونالد ترامپ (بسته به منافع و شرایط سیاسی، گاهی بین دو جناح جابهجا میشود)
- استیو ویتکاف و جرد کوشنر
- پیت هگست
۳. جناح مداخلهگرا و حامی ادامه فشار نظامی و اقتصادی (همگی حامی اسرائیل)
- مارکو روبیو
جمهوریخواهان بانفوذ خارج از دولت:
- لیندزی گراهام
- تد کروز
- تام کاتن
- راجر ویکر
مقامات سابق دولت ترامپ:
- مایک پمپئو
- جان بولتون
- مایک پنس
" ترامپ، جیدی ونس، جارد کوشنر و ویتکاف رفتند و در بازار سیاست خاورمیانه، از همان فرشفروشهایی که فکر میکردند میتوانند دورشان بزنند، خودشان شش دور چرخیدند و با دست خالی برگشتند."
Couldn’t have said it any better. @AriAramesh, your wit is exquisitely sharp! 😂
تنها امید این است که جمهوری اسلامی باز هم هیچ فرصتی را از دست ندهد برای از دست دادن یک فرصت.
یعنی چه؟ یعنی ترامپ، جیدی ونس، جارد کوشنر و ویتکاف رفتند و در بازار سیاست خاورمیانه، از همان فرشفروشهایی که فکر میکردند میتوانند دورشان بزنند، خودشان شش دور چرخیدند و با دست خالی برگشتند.
اگر ایالات متحده شانسی داشته باشد، این است که جمهوری اسلامی دوباره همان کار همیشگیاش را بکند: دروغ بگوید، تقلب کند، وقت بخرد و توافق را بازی بدهد. اما سؤال اصلی اینجاست: آیا اصلاً اعتباری به ترامپ هست که وقتی دوباره فریب خورد، برگردد و جمهوری اسلامی را سر جای خودش بنشاند؟
مشکل ترامپ همین است؛ هیچ پرنسیپ و اصولی ندارد. نه در سیاست خارجی، نه در فهم منافع ملی آمریکا. حاضر است حتی منافع ملی ایالات متحده را هم قربانی نمایشهای کوتاهمدت و توافقهای توخالی کند.
او نه درکی از تاریخ آمریکا دارد، نه از فلسفه اتحادهای راهبردی این کشور، نه از این حقیقت ساده که امنیت و اعتبار آمریکا با مماشات با رژیمهای متخاصم حفظ نمیشود.
@marklevinshow This makes me sick to my stomach, as it will result in more terrorist attacks & thousands of innocent lives lost across the Middle East. This is MORALLY wrong. The frozen assets that belong to the Iranian people shouldn't be given to the terrorist regime holding them hostage.
@a_r_samary درود بر شما دکتر ثمری،
سپاسگزارم برای زمان، مهر، و بینشی که در ساخت این ویدیوها میگذارید. این ویدیوها نهتنها ایرانیان را با سیاست و تاریخ آشناتر میکنند، بلکه دید همگانی را ژرفتر، آگاهی شهروندی را نیرومندتر، و پایههای جامعهای آگاهتر را استوارتر میسازند.
#جاويدشاه
So when you’re a pro American country, and even fight alongside them, you get back stabbed. But when you fight against them, and even kill Americans, you get billions. Huh.
Alright.
We went from Epic Fury, crushing Iran’s nuclear/missile threat to Epic Failure and capitulation.
Weak leadership just handed them a lifeline. Iran MOU is a disaster.
America First? More like Iran First!
President Trump:
“To the great, proud people of Iran: The hour of your freedom is at hand. When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take.”
In response to media reports on the details of a near-final 60-day U.S.-Iran MOU, JINSA President and CEO @MichaelMakovsky encourages President Trump to reject it and issued the following statement:
If the reported details of a proposed U.S.-Iran MOU are broadly accurate, it would represent a loss of American nerve and damaging strategic reversal in recent American policy, abandoning many of President Trump’s prior redlines, undercutting many of the tremendous achievements of the military campaign, and undermining U.S. credibility.
I hope President Trump recognizes the enormous dangers posed by this reported MOU and rejects this disastrous arrangement. He should reverse course and restore American credibility by resuming military action that further weakens Iran’s conventional military and nuclear capabilities, ensuring the freedom of commerce through the Strait of Hormuz, maintains economic pressure on the Tehran regime, and supporting Iranians seeking to bring about the regime’s collapse, which is the ultimate strategic prize for the United States.
The U.S.-Israeli military campaign made major advances in curbing Iran’s ability to project power and weakening the regime, for which both countries’ militaries and political leaders are to be commended. However, rather than degrading Iran further, this deal would strengthen and enrich it, thereby prolonging its survival.
Comparisons to President Barack Obama’s 2015 JCPOA would be immediate and deserved. The United States would again be financially rewarding the Tehran regime to negotiate on its nuclear program while not addressing Iran’s missile capabilities or its aggressive regional activities.
In some respects, this agreement is worse than the JCPOA, since the United States would be relinquishing leverage accumulated through 38 days of direct military confrontation, strategic isolation, maritime pressure, and visible deterioration of Iran’s internal and regional position.
If Iran would not agree to acceptable American terms on its nuclear program during a ceasefire — while facing a blockade, economic strangulation, internal instability, and the credible prospect of renewed severe U.S.-Israeli military operations — there is no serious reason to believe lifting that pressure will produce a better outcome.
Without the complete, permanent, and verifiable dismantlement of Iran’s entire nuclear program, the regime’s pathway back to nuclear weapons capability is preserved and will restart, no later than after President Trump leaves office.
The Iranian regime and its supporters will rightly see this agreement as a victory over the United States, emerging not only intact but with new life thanks to the unfreezing of assets, the resumption of significant oil sales (mostly to China), and effective control over the Strait of Hormuz. President Trump would also be abandoning the Iranian population, with whom he has repeatedly expressed solidarity and support, by rescuing this brutal and corrupt regime from collapse.
It betrays Israel, our full-fledged partner in the war, which reportedly opposes this deal and was given little say in it. Israel will undoubtedly need to conduct another military action against Iran at some point to undo the damage from this deal. Israel also cannot be expected to adhere to any Iranian veto over Lebanon, and will be compelled to maintain its military action against Iran’s terrorist proxy Hezbollah that continues to threaten Israel’s northern towns.
The MOU also leaves exposed our Gulf Arab allies to an emboldened Iran as America retreats from the region.
The lesson for the rest of the world will be that America can be coerced through brinkmanship, defiance, and threats to maritime commerce and energy markets. China will take note and is a clear winner, and Taiwan a loser.
There should be no memorandum of understanding, interim deal, or partial arrangement with the Tehran regime, as it will not be worth the paper it is written on.
(1/2)
Some of the Woke Reich neo-fascists who were crying about taking out Iran's nuclear sites last June and this year, with the help of our Israeli allies, are back to celebrating the Iranian regime and Hezbollah. Retardicans.
Like it or not, the reality is this: Trump negotiated for PERSONAL INTERESTS, and Iran negotiated like a GANG. The individual and the gang got their deal,but BOTH nations LOST.