So the @SECGov gets to operate behind a veil of secrecy staffed by ex-Wall Street exec's, ignores unbridled fleecing of investors by bad financial actors, & blocks the door to an outside look-see. Yet the SEC is funded by the taxpayers they're supposed to protect?
#MMTLP $MMTLP
Shocker - the SEC doesn't want DOGE to follow the money
Because the SEC doesn't want DOGE to find out why trade settlement is not enforced
"The data access requested by Eliezer Mishory, who is leading the DOGE team at the SEC, includes staff emails, personnel data, contracts, and payments systems, the people said, speaking under the condition of anonymity.
The SEC, currently led by Acting Chairman Mark Uyeda, pushed back on the request, according to the people.
It is unclear whether the DOGE team has been granted access to any of the data or why it sought those records...."
Courtesy :@settlethetrades@ham59591shorts
"Ignore the problem long enough and it will go away".
When will the DTCC realize - with a driven trustee simply looking for truth and backed by very pissed off #MMAT and #MMTLP investors - these games they play just won't work any more.
📣📣DTCC HAS NOT PRODUCED SUBPOENAED RECORDS 🤔
The DTCC has failed to produce the records that have been subpoenaed in the MMAT MMTLP Bankruptcy case.
WHY❓️
DTCC is the system that is where the bodies are.
The Trustee is well aware that they hold very important records for her investigation.
Is the DTCC trying to run the statute of limitations clock out to hide the crime 🤔
#GNS Float Breakdown/#RS Quell - Mechanics First (Early June 2026)
#NumbersOverNarratives.
Real #DD is becoming rarer and rarer in this #community. Not because it doesn’t exist, but because factual, mechanics driven #analysis doesn’t spread like “yes-man” hype, hopium, and superficial shout out farming.
I’m not here to spin #narratives, I’m not here chasing company recognition, or pats on the back. I’m here ONLY to deliver factual, Numbers over Narratives DD. Due diligence that arms #retail investors with real #mechanics so they can fight #TheSwamp on equal footing is my main purpose.
I don’t work for the #suits or #elites. My moral compass, and ethical makeup, are sound. Confusion over right and wrong has never been an issue for me. I only move for #retail.
With that being said…let me scratch that #GNS DD itch, and #quell the #RS Echo Chamber #FUD.
Verifiable Steps (Directly from Filings/Press Releases):
1. Starting #Total Issued/OS.
- 194.68M shares - verified as of May 28, 2026. No new shares issued since.
2. Minus #ERL + #ICC Retirement - Pending (30.1M).
- 22.7M unclaimed ERL + 5.5M returned + 7.4M ICC arbitration award (already at Vstock).
- 194.68M – 30.1M = 164.58M.
3. Minus Insiders/Restricted (30.4M).
- Book entry at Vstock (per April 23, 2026 press release).
- 164.58M – 30.4M = 134.18M.
4. Company Stated Remaining Public Float Base.
- 116.7M shares (explicitly stated April 23, 2026).
- Why the ~17.5M gap exists (134.18M to 116.7M): Additional company defined exclusions include other restricted blocks, unvested RSUs, treasury adjustments, and items classified as non-public.
5. Minus 10M CEO Class C Conversion.
- June 1, 2026 conversion to super voting shares held at Vstock (non-tradable).
- 116.7M – 10M = 106.7M.
Current Tradeable/Broker Lendable Float Post Step 5 (this is now opinion and forward based thinking):
- Base Case (50% Investor DRS on 106.7M base):
- 106.7M × 50% = 53.35M locked and 53.35 million tradeable.
At the current 3 month average daily volume of ~8.7 million shares, the Base Case 53.35M tradeable float already equates to only ~6 days of normal trading supply.
Reported short interest sits at ~6.85M shares. On the Base Case 53.35M tradeable float, this represents a ~12.8% short ratio, and that pressure intensifies significantly as the float compresses further through buybacks, retirements, and DRS.
Continued Compression Levers Remaining 2025:
- Remaining 2025 Buyback Authority: ~10 million shares left (expires July 7, 2026 AGM). Roger can execute fully before then at ~$2.3M cost (@ $0.23).
- If executed: Post buyback tradeable float drops to ~43.35 million (Base Case).
- New 2026 20% Buyback Mandate (to be voted July 7): ~38.936 million shares equivalent. Combined with the remaining 10M, Roger would have potential authority for up to ~49 million shares of buyback firepower.
Combined Post Retirement + Post-10M Buyback Scenario (Base Case 50% DRS):
-Tradeable float compresses to the ~38–40 million zone once the 30.1M ERL/ICC shares are finally cancelled. This would represent roughly a 75–80% reduction from the original 194.68M issued OS in effective lendable supply.
Float Compression Roadmap (Base Case 50% DRS):
- Current (early June): 53.35M (~72.6% reduction).
- After remaining 10M Buyback: 43.35M (~77.7% reduction).
- After 30.1M Retirement + Buyback: ~38–40M (~79–80% reduction).
***Note on the ~40.1M Shares (30.1M ERL/ICC + 10M CEO Class C)***
- These remain technically part of the issued share count pending final actions. The 30.1M ERL/ICC block is already at Vstock and targeted for treasury/permanent cancellation “as soon as practical.” This limbo explains why short pressure can persist until resolved, and why the RS angle is being trolled.
The Conditional 10-for-1 RS Authority - Pure Protective Layer (Trolls are hammering the reverse split language, here is the mechanics reality):
- The proposed 10-for-1 conditional share consolidation is STRICTLY discretionary safety net authority. The Board can use it (or not use it) solely if needed for NYSE American compliance. The trolls framing this as “they’re about to RS next month” are mislabeling the language and framing intentionally. It is insurance, not intention.
- Even if activated, a new 10-for-1 (which I'm absolutely against) would bring the two year cumulative ratio to 100:1. Which is still well below the NYSE American 200:1 limit. The authority is safe to have in the back pocket.
- Having the RS in our back pocket guarantees that GNS will continue trading on the NYSE American no matter what. It addresses the $0.25 hard floor effective October 1, 2026 (any close below $0.25 triggers IMMEDIATE suspension/delisting with no cure period). The RS is a LAST resort insurance IF timelines drag due to Swamp mechanics, but based on the structure above, it should not be needed.
Why the RS Should Not Be Needed:
-Nearly 4 months of runway until the hard floor.
- Ongoing structural compression (DRS + retirements + buybacks).
- Strong catalyst calendar well before October 1.
- AGI Infinity Portfolio deployments (already started June 1; Phase 1 up to $100M with major pre-IPO AI exposure).
- Legal resolutions + 30.1M share retirements.
- ASX dual listing progress.
- Jewel Digital Bank/JUSD stablecoin kickoff (H2 2026). BTC Loyalty Program Round 2 (ongoing DRS incentive).
- Bitcoin treasury growth, AI education revenue ramp, and more.
- No dilution from the recent AGI additions (all funded from existing resources.)
DRS Scenarios (on 106.7M base):
- Bear (40% DRS) → 42.68M DRS → 64.02M tradeable
- Base (50% DRS) → 53.35M DRS → 53.35M tradeable
- Bull (60% DRS) → 64.02M DRS → 42.68M tradeable
Why 50% DRS is Reasonable & Conservative (Base Case):
Pure investor DRS reached ~18.2% mid 2025 and total book entry hit 60.3% by September 2025. The BTC Loyalty Dividend flywheel plus 2+ years of consistent push create steady momentum. 50% is balanced and accounts for real world friction.
Bottom line, the mechanics show a tightening supply structure, multiple near term catalysts, and protective tools in reserve. The RS language is being weaponized, but the verifiable math and catalyst timeline tell a much STRONGER story.
Key Takeaways:
- Verifiable tradeable float is already tight at ~53.35M (Base Case).
- Structural tools are actively compressing supply.
- Multiple high conviction catalysts are lined up before the October hard floor.
- The RS is discretionary insurance, not the plan.
The mechanics favor long-term holders. Numbers over Narratives, and #Paytience is the weapon they hate most. I have my #popcorn ready.
OneLove and StayBlessed
DiggerBG
NFA/DYODD
#GNS #DominoThesis #NumbersOverNarratives #FAFO #TickTock #AGI #DiggerBG #SpaceX #Anthropic #OpenAI #IPO #SWAMP @rogerhamilton #DRS #VStock #LockIt @geniusacademyai
One of the best ways we can protect investors and facilitate capital formation is by empowering Americans to invest wisely—especially the service members who defend our Republic.
It was an honor to spend time with some of these brave men and women last week.
BREAKING:
Andrew Left, one of the world’s most notorious short sellers, has been found GUILTY of 12 out of 16 counts of securities fraud by a US federal jury.
The landmark trial exposed how he used social media to manipulate stock prices for profit.
The era of short-and-distort schemes is cracking. Justice has been served.
Next Bridge Hydrocarbons Announces SEC Declares Effective its S-1 Registration Statement
Company prices and commences a public offering of 40 million shares
https://t.co/2hO7KuPeJJ
🚨NEXT BRIDGE HYDROCARBONS' PRICED AND EFFECTIVE...COME GET 'EM BOYS AND GIRLS!!!
💥$15 per share
💥Up to 40 million
💥Margin calls/deposit increases incoming.
💥SEA 15c3-3
Shareholders who have been refused transfers to AST/EQ...you know what to do!!!
MMTLP MMAT TRCH
https://t.co/rbg1aSVxxC
$MMTLP
“Next Bridge Hydrocarbons Announces SEC Declares Effective its S-1 Registration Statement”
“Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc., an oil and natural gas exploration and production company with interests in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, announced today that it has priced and commenced a public offering of up to 40,000,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share at an offering price of $15.00 per share, less the placement agent fee…”
Courtesy @kimkep4796
Nasdaq is reportedly shutting down its high speed trading service.
The Financial Times reports Nasdaq is accused of only offering the service to select clients.
This comes days after Nasdaq is subpoenaed in the $MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH Meta Materials bankruptcy case
"The exchange had been marketing a faster fibre optic cable that cut trade execution time by up to a third, but the service was not publicly disclosed, sparking complaints from competitors, the report stated.
In February, McKay Brothers, a U.S. telecoms firm, alleged in a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that Nasdaq was covertly offering the technology to certain customers for a $10,000 monthly fee, the report said...."
@palikaras@johnbrda@kimkep4796@anna_trades@ham59591shorts
$GNS [UPDATE]
Genius Group Limited v. LZG International, Inc.
Genius Group Limited has expanded its legal representation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by retaining Eric J. Benzenberg of The Basile Law Firm, P.C. as additional counsel. The addition of the New York-based firm, which specializes in complex corporate and securities litigation, indicates that Genius Group is committing significant resources to ensure a definitive resolution in its ongoing legal matter against LZG International, Inc.
This strategic reinforcement adds specialized firepower to Genius Group's existing legal team at a critical moment. Having already won a favorable Final Award from the ICC International Court of Arbitration, Genius Group is aggressively pressing its advantage in federal court to officially confirm that victory, protect its corporate interests and maximize value for its shareholders.
With its legal roster heavily fortified, Genius Group is primed to dictate the pace of the next phase of litigation. The expanded legal team will now force LZG International to respond to the federal petition under strict court deadlines. Shareholders can expect Genius Group's newly empowered counsel to relentlessly drive the case forward, shutting down stalling tactics and securing a successful resolution in New York federal court.
🚨Breaking news: 🦋
@Nasdaq just LOST its Motion to Quash.
Read that again s l o w l y . . .
The Bankruptcy Court in Nevada has now ordered Nasdaq to produce extensive $MMAT/TRCH trading data under Rule 2004, including RASH and CORE data, order attributes, cancellations, replaces, executions, and related transaction records covering nearly FOUR YEARS.
The Court was NOT persuaded by the ‘undue burden’ argument, noting that producing ~15GB of spreadsheet data is not exactly impossible for… Nasdaq. (One $10 usb stick)
Even more important, the Court explicitly recognized the Trustee’s AUTHORITY to investigate whether wrongdoing occurred on behalf of the estate, including potential claims tied to stock trading activity.
Translation:
This investigation is very much ALIVE.
For months, some people mocked and undermined the Trustee’s efforts, claimed discovery would never happen, and acted like every subpoena didn’t get served initially and that it would be crushed before daylight. Instead, the wall keeps cracking.
FINRA discovery.
Now Nasdaq discovery.
And the Court explicitly referenced separate pending motions involving Citadel, Virtu, and Anson.
Interesting times ahead.
Turns out Rule 2004 is not just a decorative suggestion.
To the Trustee and legal teams, incredible respect.
It takes courage to walk into rooms filled with institutions that have virtually unlimited resources and say:
‘Produce the data’
And to the echo chambers already warming up their spin machines tonight…
You may want to read the actual order first. 🤝
Blessings to all.
MMAT
⚖️Case: In re Meta Materials Inc.
Case No.: 24-50792-gs (Chapter 7, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada)
Filing Date: May 14, 2026
Docs: 2773, 2774, 2774-1, 2775, 2776, 2776-1 (Documents in comment section)
⚠️ Not Legal Advice
Big Picture (Plain English)
These filings look like the trustee broadening the financial investigation from market/trading discovery into the company’s banking records.
Translation:
The trustee isn’t just asking “What happened in the market?” anymore. She’s also asking “What happened to the company’s money?” 💸 ❓
⸻
DOC 2773 — Ex Parte Motion re Silicon Valley Bank
What it is:
The trustee asks the court for permission to compel Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) to provide records and potentially have a records custodian examined under Bankruptcy Rule 2004.
Layman’s version:
“Judge, we need SVB’s records to trace Meta’s money.”
What they want:
Account ending 7741
Account ending 7011
Any linked/associated accounts
Date range: Aug. 5, 2023 to present
Including:
monthly statements
deposits
withdrawals
wires
ACH transfers
checks (front/back)
internal transfers
Why this matters:
Trustee explicitly says she wants to understand:
potential disbursement of debtor property
how those disbursements affected Meta’s financial condition
possible recovery for the estate
Translation:
This is classic money-tracing.
⸻
DOC 2774 — Notice of Subpoena to SVB
What it is:
Formal notice that the trustee intends to subpoena SVB.
This isn’t arguing the merits—it’s procedural notice to interested parties.
Plain English:
“FYI everyone, the subpoena is being served.”
⸻
DOC 2774-1 — SVB Subpoena (image below)
What it is:
The actual subpoena paperwork sent to SVB.
Notable points:
SVB gets ~21 days from service unless otherwise arranged
Standard subpoena protections apply:
can object
can seek to quash
privilege protections exist
Plain English:
This is the enforceable “produce the records” document.
⸻
DOC 2775 — Ex Parte Motion re JPMorgan Chase
Same concept as SVB—but bigger.
🗄️Trustee wants Chase records under Rule 2004.
Accounts requested:
ending 5780, 5970, 6175, 1145, 1946, 6174, plus linked accounts
Date range:
Aug. 5, 2023 to present
Same requested records:
statements, deposits, withdrawals, wires, ACH, checks, internal transfers
Plain English:
“Show us where the money went.”
⸻
DOC 2776 — Notice of Subpoena to JPMorgan Chase
Procedural notice to parties that Chase will be subpoenaed.
Nothing dramatic by itself.
⸻
DOC 2776-1 — JPMorgan Chase Subpoena (image below)
Actual subpoena paperwork to Chase.
Again:
compliance required unless objection
subpoena enforcement mechanisms, exist failure can lead to contempt under Rule 45
⸻
Why This Matters (Strategic View)
This appears to be a parallel investigative track:
Track 1: Market conduct
Already ongoing:
FINRA
Nasdaq
Citadel
Virtu
Anson Funds
DTCC
Schwab
TD Ameritrade
TradeStation
Focus:
Was market activity harming Meta?
⸻
🏦Track 2: Internal financial trail 👀
New here:
📑 JPMorgan
📑 SVB
Focus:
💵What happened to Meta’s cash❓
⸻
🏦The trustee may be trying to answer questions like:
Did cash leave the company in problematic ways?
Were transfers ordinary business activity?
Were there potentially avoidable transfers?
Were there insiders/payees worth examining?
Are there recoverable estate assets?
Rule 2004 is intentionally broad, and this fits squarely inside a trustee’s investigative powers. 🔍
⸻
✅ Bottom Line
This is not about naked shorting.
This is about following the money inside Meta Materials itself.
If the prior subpoena wave was:
“What happened in the market?”
This wave is:
“What happened in Meta’s bank accounts?” 🕵️♀️💵
👀👀MMAT MMTLP TRCH
FINRA’s Vault Cracks Open Sensitive Docs/Real Evidence Headed to $MMAT Trustee
FINRA just agreed to hand over sensitive trading, investigation, and market data to the $MMAT bankruptcy trustee, but only under super-strict secrecy rules. So instead of continuing to fight the subpoena, the investigation can actually move forward.
Courtesy @kimkep4796
🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️
🦋 $MMAT | In re Meta Materials Inc. (Bankr. D. Nev.)
📅 Filed: May 8, 2026 🌶️
📄 Document 2769 — Stipulated Protective Order Relating to Subpoenas to FINRA
🧠 Layman’s Breakdown
This filing is actually good news for the trustee’s investigation.
In simple terms:
🚨 What just happened?
The trustee and FINRA reached an agreement on the rules for turning over sensitive information.
Translation:
FINRA is preparing to produce documents/data, but wanted strict confidentiality protections first.
This is NOT a fight over whether information can be produced.
This is more of a:
🤝 “Fine, we’ll produce it—but here are the rules.”
That’s a meaningful shift.
⸻
🎯 Why does this matter?
FINRA previously fought hard, arguing:
⚖️ burden
🔒 privilege
📁 confidentiality
🕵️ investigative protections
Now we have a signed protective order.
That usually means:
✅ Production is moving forward
✅ Logistics are being finalized
✅ The trustee is getting closer to actual evidence
⸻
📜 What is a protective order?
Think of it like a court-enforced NDA.
Sensitive material can be handed over, but:
❌ not dumped publicly
❌ not posted online
❌ not used outside this case
✅ only approved people can see it
⸻
📊 What can FINRA label confidential?
A LOT.
Examples:
📂 internal regulatory materials
🕵️ investigation-related information
📈 trading / transactional data
🏢 proprietary business info
👤 customer/member information
💰 investor/fund positions
📨 nonpublic communications
Translation:
The trustee may be getting highly sensitive market data.
⸻
🔐 Two levels of secrecy
🟡 1. CONFIDENTIAL
Can be seen by:
👩⚖️ trustee
⚖️ trustee’s attorneys
👥 staff helping the case
📊 retained experts
🛠 litigation consultants
⸻
🔴 2. ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
Even tighter.
Basically limited to:
⚖️ lawyers
🧠 approved experts
🖥 support personnel
Meaning:
🚫 not broad distribution
⸻
👀 HUGE practical point: Who’s on the trustee team?
This filing specifically identifies outside counsel helping the trustee:
⚖️ Hartman & Hartman
⚖️ Christian Attar
🔥 Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
⚖️ Robison Sharp Sullivan & Brust / SBW
⚖️ Schneider Wallace
Why this matters:
Kasowitz is not your average routine bankruptcy admin firm.
That suggests:
💥 serious litigation preparation
⸻
🛡 What FINRA still protects
Important caveat:
FINRA is NOT waiving privilege.
They specifically preserve:
🔒 attorney-client privilege
📚 work product
🕵️ investigative file privilege
⚖️ other legal protections
Translation:
This is NOT “open the vault.”
⸻
🌐 Can shareholders see this data?
Not automatically.
If filed with court:
🔐 likely under seal
⚖️ public release would require further steps
So:
👀 shareholders probably won’t immediately see raw production.
⸻
🚀 Big strategic takeaway
This strongly suggests discovery is shifting from:
❌ “Should FINRA produce?”
to
✅ “How do we handle what FINRA produces?”
That’s a meaningful procedural win.
The real question now:
🤔 What’s in the data?
⸻
🦋 Quick Summary
FINRA and the trustee just agreed on confidentiality rules for subpoenaed materials. That usually means production is moving forward. Sensitive market/regulatory data may be coming in, heavyweight litigation counsel is clearly involved, but much of the evidence may remain sealed unless used later in litigation.
⚠️ Not legal advice
https://t.co/lRm1xi9kUw
⚠️WRECK THE NARRATIVE #4787: MMTLP
XTD NARRATIVE: "There’s no proof of ANY overages. AT ALL. None."
TRUTH/FACTS/RECEIPTS:
✅FINRA admits to 2.65 million open short interest after the halt:
Based on FINRA’s subsequent regulatory efforts, FINRA estimates that there was an aggregate short interest position in MMTLP in accounts held at broker-dealers as of December 12 of approximately 2.65 million shares…”
RECEIPT: https://t.co/A18AqJOtls
✅ 15.4 million shares borrowed and sold short on last day of trading:
@JohnnyTabacco confirms, 15.4 million shares were borrowed and sold short on 12/8/2022. TOTAL SALES from 12/8/2022 have been reported to be between 8.33 million and 13.7 million. The math ain't mathin'!
RECEIPTS: https://t.co/Idz9G9SOe5
https://t.co/GZ3vyr1Kpu
https://t.co/buJMPwhrNq
✅Anson Funds requested 10 million shares from NBH/Roth after the halt:
"Anson Funds contacted Roth Capital seeking to buy shares of Nextbridge. 10 million shares at $0.30 cents a share to cover their short position. This is all documented. Roth’s response was, wait a second, don’t you have a borrow? Anson’s response was 'no'."
RECEIPT: https://t.co/A08NJZDC2T
✅Financial Institutions contact NBH to buy shares halt:
In a letter to FINRA's Robert Colby (Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer), NBH stated,
"Per your request, the investment banking firm representing Next Bridge on our proposed S-1 has received several inbound calls from financial institutions needing to buy our shares to get their books in balance. One of the inquiries was of a size so large that I requested to be on a call with this group. From this call, I now have knowledge of an admitted shareholder imbalance from one single financial institution that is multiples more than 2.65mm shares. We continue to collect additional data regarding imbalances from multiple sources."
RECEIPT: https://t.co/B8fbTQ2VOs
In a PR Newswire release, NBH explicitly referenced foreign firms:
"Unfortunately, we believe this is a consequential blind spot in FINRA's data, because foreign firms have approached Next Bridge about procuring more than 2.65 million shares."
RECEIPT: https://t.co/jMrfuRnADt
✅Tradestation admits shares are not backed by certificates:
“Despite TradeStation’s best efforts, we have been unable to recall a portion of the lent-out shares because there is currently no market for the security. This means that we will not be able to honor some of our customers’ requests to register or record their ownership in book entry form with AST because the shares are not backed by physical certificates.”
RECEIPT: See email image below.
✅Hilltop Securities admitted to @PeteSessions that they have a “big problem”. Hilltop Securities provides clearing services for Schwab.
✅Broker-dealer statement confirms shareholder has 7x certificate allotment:
One shareholder in one broker holds 50,000 shares. Settlement/Clearing firm has 7,038 certificate allotment and clears for several brokerages.
RECEIPT: See image below.
✅ FIF Brokers admit they can not deliver shares:
"Because of prior FINRA trading halt, there are shares on loan that lending broker-dealers cannot recover."
RECEIPT: https://t.co/C79tBKmQOl
✅Other damning evidence is confidential and has been forwarded to Administration Officials, select Congress members and Legal Counsel for Issuers and Bankruptcy.
Can we FINALLY stop the 🐂💩and admit WE STILL HAVE A SETTLEMENT ISSUE???
MMTLP MMAT TRCH