This is a previously unseen and unpublished picture of Charlie Kirk being carried to the SUV. Notice the marks under his right nipple. Notice, perhaps more importantly, the absence of marks in a rectangle formation.
TPUSA insiders still have time to come forward, but it’s running out.
This day isn’t going to end well for you. I promise.
Guys, he is the male version of Erika Kirk. At least he puts in some work into it. You know why he always laughs when Trump talks about 9/11 and his connections with Jeffrey? That’s a nervous reaction, that’s him trying to tell you, “Oh, this is so ridiculous it makes me laugh.’’ - that’s the message. He must’ve forgotten that years ago he was practically trying to bawl his eyes out while talking about 9/11 and the employees lost. Now, I guess it’s just funny to him. Time heals, they say. Lutnick has done a lot of healing.🙂They spent billions covering up their crimes, but they couldn’t spend $150 an hour on acting lessons for this guy? Are you kidding me?
As you know, I’ve been analyzing the Epstein files for days. Episode #2 coming soon. I can't tell you everything for sure, but I can tell you this: Epstein’s sex operations were a side thing for him. He was a financial hitman or agent/operator, or whatever you want to call him. His main goal was to consolidate power for his masters in the financial world and in a way control the financial world. (I will be doing an in-depth article on Patreon).
One of the reasons we don’t have all the files in front of us is because it’s highly likely that they contain the truth about 9/11 or real clues about 9/11. What I don’t understand, though, is why? Why not release them? There isn’t not a single smart person in this country who still doubts that 9/11 was an inside job. Every smart person knows it was. We also know Bush belongs in prison with his friends. Lutnick definitely belongs in prison. But of course no one ever goes to prison in this country, so it's not like they have that to worry about. 🙂
I don’t understand why they’re still sitting on it. It’s not as if anyone expects meaningful action regarding accountability from the government. We already know they did it. And it’s up to us to demand accountability, including that Lutnick faces consequences.Yet I don’t see any protests at all in the streets. I don’t understand why they would be worried at all, no one in this country ever seems to take action. 🤦🏻♀️
I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is.
I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath.
What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain:
That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her.
Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.)
Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance.
Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity.
Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure.
Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power.
What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker.
Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride.
What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time.
In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks!
It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely!
Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing.
Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came.
What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion.
This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.
Dave Chappelle says that if he ever says “I stand with Israel,” it’s a code for “they got him,” and people should stop listening to anything he says after that.
He says his greatest fear is being co-opted, as he doesn’t want the same thing to happen to him that happened to Charlie Kirk.
Tim Dillon Calls TPUSA a ‘Bad Reality Show’
“It feels like you're being played. It seems off. You feel like this is a coordinated and choreographed spectacle so that you are played. They want your money.”
Candace Owens is not claiming to be judge, jury, or executioner. She’s doing what journalists once did without apology: following leads, naming names, and asking the public to help connect the dots. In a functioning democracy, that’s not dangerous it’s essential.
If you have information, preserve it. If you have footage, secure it. And if you believe in truth, don’t wait for permission to care.
UGC and TikTok shop have changed the trajectory of my business.
And I had created an entire story that I was too old and no brand would want a mature woman whose hair is going gray, AND damn I’m glad I was wrong & went for it.
I’m looking forward to doing more travel UGC!
Grab my template & video walkthrough to write your sales page that is driven for conversion (aka sales) today through my unique copywriter lense. https://t.co/Tb1quZSAss via @pinterest