My retweetes mostly reflect opinions I'm not able to articulate myself.
Multipolar world
Free Palestine
No mas bloqueo
Yankee go home
Israel delenda est
We need to speak out about what is happening right now: The United States government is starving the Cuban people.
11 million people without fuel. Children without food or medicine. Hospitals without power. Babies dying without working incubators.
End the blockade now.
You also now have the history that your club’s only successful period was on account of 74 now-proven counts of cheating.
Which many would argue makes your club’s history obsolete dogshit 👍🏼
@Dbbyafc@SardarGooner Think he was booked because he signalled with a hand motion to the ref for the Chelsea player to receive a yellow card. That's a bookable offence.
£85m for Cody Gakpo would mean City's spending since January 2025 now totals £815.4m on 19 players. If Enzo Fernandez signs before the end of the transfer window, that takes it to £935.4m (€1.1 billion).
Two years since their hearing finished in December 2024. Three & a half years since they were charged in February 2023. Their cheating, corruption & financial doping, we are too numb to what a disgrace they are.
“Do You Support Israel’s Right to Exist?” Mehdi Hasan FIRES BACK
Mehdi Hasan: I've been debating hardcore Zionists, Israeli supporters of Israel, for years. And the conversation always comes back to one talking point:
“Do you, or do you not support Israel’s right to exist?”
If you don't, you're an extremist, you're an anti-Semite, you want to wipe Israel and millions of Israeli Jews off the map.
But you don't have to concede on this point. It's a bullshit argument.
Number one: Right to exist where?
Israel is the only country in the world that refuses to define its borders.
So if you want me to recognize Israel's right to exist, does that extend into Gaza, the West Bank, the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem all considered illegally occupied territory under international law?
So, right to exist where?
Number two: What is this right to exist? Where does it come from?
States don't have a right to exist. People, individuals have a right to exist. Human beings have that right. Not states, not countries.
The USSR broke up into Russia and 14 other states. Yugoslavia broke up. Czechoslovakia split into Slovakia and the Czech Republic.
What happened to their “right to exist”?
People have rights, not states.
And number three: If there is a right to exist, does Palestine have a right to exist?
Israel exists. It's a country with sovereignty, it's on the map.
The idea that in a world where Israel is genociding the Palestinians in Gaza, ethnically cleansing them in the West Bank, and blocking their legal right to return the idea that Israel's right to exist is the one we should be concerned about, and not Palestine's, is both ridiculous and, let's be honest, racist.
Sky News reports that a 28-year-old Palestinian woman, six months pregnant and suffering severe internal bleeding, was being transported from Qaryout in the occupied West Bank to Rafidia Surgical Hospital in Nablus when Israeli soldiers stopped her ambulance at the Awarta checkpoint.
Video shows Israeli forces detained the ambulance crew for more than 30 minutes, subjected the bleeding, critically ill woman to a physical search, and ordered the driver to turn off the engine, cutting power to the vehicle’s onboard medical equipment.
During the forced delay, a nurse was forced to deliver the fetus stillborn inside the stranded ambulance. The woman was eventually allowed to proceed to the hospital, where doctors performed emergency surgery and saved her life. The baby could not be saved.
Israel is the only country in the world that can bomb 9 countries and invade 3 neighboring countries in one year; kill 100,000 people—including 25,000 children—in 1,000 days; displace nearly 6 million people in 3 countries; starve 2 million people in Gaza; violate Geneva and Vienna Conventions, international law, human rights, and state sovereignty; kidnap, rape and torture children and women; shoot, imprison and murdering; and still be perceived as the victim.
This half time show is fucking dystopian.
"We believe in love"
Meanwhile Infantino is on Trumps "Board of Peace" as they set up literal concentration camps in Gaza.
Fuck the USA and Fuck FIFA
America are having a mental breakdown because some of their troops were killed in Jordan
But it was ok for them to slaughter 170 schoolgirls on day 1 & attack water plants serving millions of civilians
Fuck right the way off.
Let's debunk some hasbara:
This video was posted on the 18th of July 2024. The next day, on the 19th of July, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel's occupation since 1967 is unlawful, that settlements have no legal validity and must be evacuated, and that Israel owes full reparations. The vote was 11-4 on unlawfulness, 14-1 on settlements. (https://t.co/Zd4d5hhafv)
Natasha Hausdorff is not a neutral expert. She is the pro bono legal director of UK Lawyers for Israel and clerked for the president of the Israeli Supreme Court. (https://t.co/yZ0T6FwUWX) She is an advocate, not a disinterested authority.
The "uti possidetis juris" argument comes from one paper by Avi Bell and Eugene Kontorovich (https://t.co/a1a567ODZ8), both of the Kohelet Policy Forum, a right-wing Israeli think tank that supports West Bank annexation. (https://t.co/UhoGBavpg4) At the ICJ, exactly one judge out of fifteen adopted it (Sebutinde, in dissent). The other fourteen did not. (https://t.co/fz2ly8khgm)
Why? Because Israel's own founding act accepted partition. Israel's Declaration of Independence established a Jewish state in part of the Mandate territory, not all of it. You cannot retroactively claim you inherited the whole thing when your founding document disclaimed it. Even Malcolm Shaw, who has represented Israel at the ICJ (https://t.co/3zfwv5JXV8), argued academically that UPJ was unworkable for Palestine precisely because the UN chose partition. (https://t.co/gu7qlWzOyK)
And the final nail: Israel's own Supreme Court has described the West Bank as held "in belligerent occupation" since the Beit Sourik ruling in 2004. (https://t.co/mufWkqMIfP)
The ICJ, the Security Council (Res 2334, 14-0) (https://t.co/Rz5oRUhuPP), the General Assembly, and Israel's own courts all recognise the occupation. What you're watching in this clip is not international law. It's advocacy dressed in a barrister's robes.
END THE ISRAELI APARTHEID.
STOP THE GENOCIDE.
FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸