@seanmdav Ah yes, "Sean Davis" says he can confirm as well. Case closed. Although, nobody gives a shit what you have to say and it makes no difference in anything. Might as well say it to the wall, guy.
Just seeing that our debate yesterday has eclipsed 3.1 million views in 18 hours.
Truly amazing.
Thank you to everyone who took the time to watch. This really was such a great win for those of us who have kept our heads down and studied this case from the very first filing, while being relentlessly attacked from people who, as Andrew Wilson so perfectly demonstrated, know literally nothing about it.
Will have much more to say on Monday but wanted to just thank our audience for taking the time to watch. ๐
https://t.co/XzuXfuSmDn
@PhillipAKennedy Don't trust @KyleSeraphin to give an informed opinion on the Charlie Kirk assassination because he can't be bothered to look into the available information beyond what was introduced at the preliminary hearing.
๐จIโm giving away my X earnings to one person who has an X Money account.
To enter:
1. Follow me
2. Repost this
3. Reply with one specific useful tip everyone should know.
Best reply wins. Current/former FBI employees ineligible. Winner announced Sunday night at 8pm.
@LegalLionTN@KyleSeraphin@thevivafrei I had a painfully long back and forth with Kyle weeks ago where originally I thought he actually cared about the truth, but as time went on, it was obvious that he's just arrogantly wrong. It was honestly a pretty big let down.
Viva commits his entire existence into this one very specific detail of hundreds that make the official narrative complete BS, and the funny thing is this hasn't even been disproven. So, either Viva is retarded or Viva is ignorant I suppose Viva could also be corrupt. Which is correct?
@KyleSeraphin@LegalLionTN@thevivafrei Kyle is solely focused on the preliminary hearing and is not willing to commit any time to understanding what happened outside of that. Good for you. It must be blissful living in total ignorance. I am so happy for you.
@Peoples_Pundit Rich, maybe stick to the things you actually know and don't opine on the things you're completely oblivious to. You're exposing yourself here.
@RealCandaceO@NickJFuentes@Rach4Patriarchy Nick is just hoping he can convince enough people it's a waste of time to keep them from seeing that what you're saying is truthful.
@RealCandaceO@NickJFuentes@Rach4Patriarchy In other words, Nick is hoping him framing it in this way will convince some people it's a waste of time in order for them to not see that what Candace is saying is obviously truthful.
@LibertyLockPod@KyleSeraphin Kyle hasn't been paying attention to this so he's just going based on what he's tangentially seen on his timeline and then the preliminary hearing. He then argues like he knows everything about it. It's a little disappointing to see.