The Democratic Party has nominated a candidate from California for the U.S. House of Representatives who introduced legislation to lower penalties for pedophiles under the guise of “equality”, along with a candidate from New Jersey with ties to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
We are not the same.
Something I learned from a mentor:
You can tell how much shame someone has by how much they judge others.
You can tell how much shame you have by how much you judge others.
@HiddenHistoryYT Germans did sortie again though … they did give up eventually but the main problem for them was trying to create a favorable engagement and British weren’t obliging… so they did give up but not immediately after Jutland
People walk around with an invisible permission structure in their head. They're waiting for someone to let them do the thing. They want a credential, a green light, an authority figure to nod.
High-agency people have basically deleted this software. They simply ask "is this possible?" not "is this permitted?"
It turns out a staggering amount of what we think is forbidden is just... unattempted.
Be your self, not someone you were assigned to be!
Bezos won on time horizon, not AWS or 1-Click.
If your bets have to work in 3 years, you compete with everyone. Every smart, funded team is chasing the same 3-year problems. Short horizon, crowded field.
Stretch to 7 and the field collapses. Investors want returns, employees want vesting, founders want proof. Almost nobody can sit in a bet that doesn't pay for most of a decade. The patience is the moat, and it costs you, that's why it works.
But you can't fake a 7-year horizon on a problem you don't actually care about. Pick the users and the problem Moloch assigned you, the safe ones, the fundable ones, and you'll bail the first hard year. Pick the ones that are actually yours and you'll still be there when everyone else has quit.
So the real prerequisite isn't discipline. It's knowing yourself well enough to choose a problem and a set of people you care about that you'll serve them for decades.
High-agency people have a fundamentally different model of where the boundaries are.
Consider the canonical example: the kid who wanted to learn from some famous person, cold-emailed them, and got a yes.
The lesson is usually framed as "you should cold-email people, the worst they can say is no." But this misses the point.
The point is that before the email was sent, the high-agency kid and the low-agency kid were living in different worlds.
In the low-agency kid's world, "I could just email this person" was not a thought that occurred, because the boundary between "people I can interact with" and "famous strangers" was drawn as a hard line, a wall.
In the high-agency kid's world, that same boundary was drawn as a customs checkpoint: annoying, sometimes guarded, but fundamentally passable if you have the right papers.
The skill isn't sending the email. The skill is seeing the email as a thing that exists in your option set.